Roll on the 20th June

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi All
I will explain why I think my setup would use less energy then Archers, first mine lets gravity use its self up meaning I kick my electromagnet in once my weight reaches around 11 if its droped from just past 12 so when my electromagnet repels my permanent magnet it pushes my weight from 11 to just past 12 to keep the rotation going, where as Archers system is from 7 to 1 as I read it, going by that I would think I need less added energy but thats not taking into acount friction, my system only only has one moving part the wheel where Archers has the wheel plus magnets, the moving magnets are added friction I don't have and added friction means more energy in to over come it so in those two examples of distance and friction mine would use less extra input energy then Archers and to be honest I don't think my system is OU.
Take Care All
Graham
 

[ramset]

Helmut thankyou I have been working with hydrogen [still am ] don't know to much about magnets   would really like to follow you   can you list any mfg or part # so I can be on same page thanks ChetPS maybe a small drawing

[badassdjbynight]

B ASS sorry I have lost confidence in modern math as it applies to my check book    calculations have there place but seem to have an agenda   sometimes      how come the 1937 dodge [ 4 door tank]got 22-25 mpg in popular mechanics add 71 FREEKING YEARS AGO  your math /ideas keep um      unless you have a contribution keep your mental farts to your self    this man does not need your[sideways] help  he knows how to do this and is teaching  not learning  [as far as this rendition]  I need his help !!!!    Chet   PS and I like to play with toys

That's simple.  Corrupt oil companies and car manufacturers.  Their math is how much $$ they can put in their pocket.  Did you know that in the 50's LA was offered a FREE monorail system.  They rejected it and instead went with a bus system, then later a rail system, then later a subway.  Why?  Because of money and payoffs and corruption.  (see: www.hightechmonorails.com)

My pinto wagon from High School got 30 mpg also.  Today car companies tout 30mpg like it's a freakin miracle of science.  Read my other posts - I'd love for there to be an answer.  I just spent 70 bucks filling up my tank - that's insane!  But why is it that the answer has to disprove anything?  Why can't it be backed up with math and science?  There is stored energy in a magnet.  I get that.

But I don't see anyone answering the hard questions with real provable answers.  Some of these questions I asked archer and he either ignore them, didn't want to give away secrets, or in one case said he didn't know because he hasn't tested this new device yet.  If something is real and it is true then the questions shouldn't be a problem.  These are not hard questions and they are nothing to get angry about...

I asked him: Does it start by you spinning it or do you set it a certain way and it starts spinning by itself?  no answer.  (BTW a satellite starts by getting it in orbit first.)

Once running how fast does it spin? over or under 60 rpm?  He said he didn't know.  How fast did the small one run?  no answer.

ramset - I've contributed to the conversation.  I'm here because I have an interest in it.  But you see me as a debunker overall.  I'm not sure that's 100% the case

[ramset]

B ASS no offence this is a first for me  [step by step] this man seems like a hero   I never built a whip {another device that these fellows refer to ] [in a bad way] so this reeks of opportunity to me   so im a virgin  ill take this at face value  and build it[been collecting the parts ] its my turn to do something [while others watch] and I will   PS you seem like a good guy[ sorry]  Chet

[jratcliff]

Here is something interesting.  On Archer's site he has a PDF file of an alleged 'house' of a now deceased Sheik.  What is particularly amusing is that this PDF is an often forwarded hoax.  You can read about it here:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_palace_of_sheikh_zayed_bin_sultan_al_nahyan/

While reading Archer's site I too found his 'explanation' of his previous device a bit difficult to follow.  I wonder if he has any photographs, videos, drawings, blue-prints, diagrams, or other materials that could better document, illustrate, and explain his previous invention.

John