Roll on the 20th June

[Sprocket]

....It still stands that the text Mr. Quinn wrote, and I quoted about four posts earlier, is a very obvious fallacy, and as such places Mr Quinn in rather poorly grounds as far as seriousness go... I wonder, WHY did he, anyway, wrote such an obviously flawed story,

Regards,

sigmaX

Hi.  Yes, I have to agree with you on this, I noticed it when I read it on his site but assumed it was an innocent mistake - as I'm sure it is...

[JohnGalt_USA]

I have solved the problem, and I will not argue how here. You will have to wait until it is properly protected. It is also a waste of time without being able to show it, for it would be premature for safety sakes. I also can't say that the man from Australia has or has not done, for I don't use magnets or motors in mine. So I will just wait and see.

Great, another free-energy humanitarian concerned about the world's safety.

i must bring several point to your attention, there is no donate button, there is no payments or cost of any kind, and this is the second machine, the first built 2 years ago, and was destroyed after contemplation that without oil millions will die in arab countires with no income or work, simply because those with the money would keep what they had knowing there was no more to come. Then after seeing the pictures of Dubai, i saw that this was a result of trillions of oil money being spent on a city whilst the country and surrounding nations remained poor. Hence i decided to rebuild the machine.

Can anyone really take Archer Quinn seriously when he makes foolish statements like this?

Archer, certainly someone as smart and clever as you would realize that there are thousands of people dying of starvation and lack of clean drinking water right now this very minute. These are problems that would be solved with free energy. If you had a working prototype two years ago and you destroyed it then you should be ashamed of yourself, you could have saved many lives.

Steorn claimed over a year ago that they were not going to let the patent (and the ridiculous jury process) interfere with getting their free energy technology up and running on water pump in Africa. Needless to say, Steorn has not delivered and people are still dying in Africa as Steorn continues their charade. 

Furthermore Archer, if you can build your wheel in a day then what in the hell are we still waiting for? Get the damn thing done tomorrow, call CNN, and by this time next week you will have to worry about paying those bills that you claim are taking you away from the project. Hell, if I had a working prototype that I destroyed (and I knew 100% that my invention was for real) I would not worry about paying any of my bills. It would take a year for the bank to foreclose on my house and by that time I would be rich beyond my wildest dreams.

It's about time to come clean Archer. You never had a working prototype did you? There is no logical reason for destroying it. I have read enough of your crazy and incoherent ramblings to know that your ego is way too big to ever destroy the greatest invention ever made! You are dragging this out for as long as you can because you get off on the attention. I am sure that it will not be too long from now when you start calling us all "stupid blond girls" because our prototypes do not work. And what in the heck is a "Dummy Spit"?

Please prove me wrong Archer and show us all a working prototype this week. If you do I will get "Archer Quinn is a God" tattooed on my forehead.


"Altruism declares that any action taken for the benefit of others is good, and any action taken for one's own benefit is evil. Thus the beneficiary of an action is the only criterion of moral value ? and so long as that beneficiary is anybody than oneself, anything goes." - Ayn Rand

[JohnGalt_USA]

if you place an arm with 900kg at each side, place each side one at 1 ocloclock, the other at 7 oclock, then the guy that adds the 100 kg extra steps in the 1 oclock arm ..... NOTHING HAPPENS!!!   the torque needed is 1 ton. If the arm had only one side, with 900kg already in it, placed at 1 oclock, then YES, it would go down, and stop about 7 oclock... but THIS WONT HAPPEN if there is another side of such arm with also 900 kg doing the opposite work: the 900kg cancels themselves, and the real torke is just 100kg.

Did I get everything wrong ?

Unfortunately you did not.

What really has me baffled is that even it you replace the 900kg weights with two blonds of equal weight it still does not work. But if you put a 100lb blond on one side and a 100lb redhead on the other side it spins like a freaking top. Give one of them a cheeseburger and it's like adding a turbo charger. It's so simple. Stupid Newton!

[Thaelin]

Mr. Galt:
   Have you by any chance done any of the afore mentioned small experiments to see what would happen? Really you should before you stick the knife in and turn it.
   Do you have a bicycle? Turn it up side down and use the front wheel to test this with. Tape a one pound weight to one side and a one pound weight exactly opposite to it. It will balance and stay there. There is your two weights on either side of the arm mentioned here. Now take a small washer and tape it to the one side and move it to the one oclock position and let it go. To the bottom and beyond just as if the other weights were not even there. Except that now it has "more" momentum behind it and will have more power at the shaft if used.
   Try it you might just get hooked and try the others as well. I just did the thing with some magnets and it did just that and when left to fly, it kept going back and forth until it ran out of power.



thaelin

[capthook]

Thaelin:

You have drawn the wrong conclusions from your "experiment".  Forget the washer.  Take the wheel with the 2 weights on either side.  Move it to the 1 O'Clock position and let go.  What happens?  The same thing as with the washer - it will swing back and forth until friction makes it stop.

This is a pendulum.  You have fooled yourself into thinking that the addition of the washer is what is providing the power.  It is not.  Your hand lifting the device to the 1 O'Clock position is what did.  The proper way to examine the effect you are interested in is to take your balance wheel with weights on both sides.  Now place a washer on one side.  What happens?  Nothing?  (unless it is a very very large heavy washer!)

Now consider how to get full rotation out of this pendulum.  You must provide a large power input to get it to swing "over the top".

As I pointed out many pages ago - and as has been pointed out by many others many times....

The addition of 1kg to a balanced 1000kg wheel will NOT give you 1001kg of torque. Like the washer - it will probably have no effect. Do you see now?

CH