Roll on the 20th June

[Newtonian God]

What amazes me, is that they are so offended by our attempts that they take time out of THEIR DAY, to come tell US what they think about what WE are doing... 
(as if we didn't already know 95% of the world was against us on this....)

No sm0ky2, you are just being ignorant. Skeptics are not offended by the attempts to achieve overunity...your missing the point of the criticisms! Archer is catching heat from me because he lied to us. In addition, he called everyone that did not understand his ramblings all dumb fucking blonds. So we waited and waited and waited...and we put up with all his bullshit for two months. Then when June 20th rolled around...and guess what?...there was no perpetual motion.

You see...Archer is nothing but a fraud. But some people here want perpetual motion so badly that they are will to overlook Archer's lies and they are supporting him. From Archer's videos I can see that Archer can be a likable chap. I want to support him but I can not bring myself to helping him until he comes clean and tells us all the truth.

[Newtonian God]

Have you heard of the psychological phenomenon known as transference?

Yes, and if you get the magnets positioned just right you can harness and endless amount of energy from it.

[sm0ky2]

@ Newt,  you are assuming that he only held one job at a time??

from the time i was 14 until 20 i worked NO LESS than 2 jobs, sometimes 3 or even 4 at a time.
each job ive held for  AT LEAST a year (i give any boss, even the bad ones, that much of a chance before giving up on them)
i've had,. roughly......  42 (may have forgotten a few?) jobs in 17 years..  some of which i kept for several years
and i think archer is a bit older than me...

thankfully, i've calmed down a bit in my old age, what with raising a family and all,. i only have ONE job now, that pays enough to support me.. and a bit of "free time" every now and then when im lucky..

given archer's attitude, i doubt he has held ANY job for a significant length of time. so 300 doesnt seem like too far of a stretch..   The first part of the job is when you "learn" a great deal of information about "how to do stuff", and from what archer has said, he probably gets bored shortly after that stage, and looks for something new to do..  means, he knows "how" to do a lot of stuff, and is probably proficient at very little.....   Even given that,.. having been trained at 300+/- jobs, places his skill-set far beyond what many people could hope to achieve in the same lifetime. litterally a jack-of-all-trades.

What exactly that has to do with building a PPM, i've no idea....


Archer isn't "duping" anyone. Hes actually getting LESS support for his efforts than most other threads on this forum, - the contents of which are less intruiging than archer's wheel...

By bashing archer, you aren't "protecting" anyone...  If you think hes not telling the truth, then think that.  Good for you!  Theres no need to repeat it over and over and over and clutter up the thread. That's not what this forum is for.

If it upsets you.,.. you know where the Door is..... 

or better yet,.. bang your head on the wall ONE more time...

maybe someone will buy into your "facts"...

[chrisC]

Hmm, you are right. Come to think of it, NO ONE (including you, me, AQ, Exx, ramset, helmut) has EVER posted ANYTHING that has amounted to something useful in the ENTIRE history of FE.

So whats your point? I have provided engineering advice that people don't seem to want to hear so I stopped and am now an unbiased encourag-er for the sake of FE...


-PurePower

PP.  Here's my point.

My principle is that unless I truly know a better (and tested) way that REALLY works and is better than what the author proposed, then I'll just SHUT UP and listen, watch, appreciate that person's trying and hopefully at the end of the day,  it's worth my time keeping a watch over that thread.

Yes, you have made suggestions, proposals etc. The quality of what you proposed is mediocre at best and is common knowledge. So why waste data space on this thread? No one is actually thinking you're really smarter. Not to mention your constant denunciation of Archer's work. Why not just let him finish? If he fails then you can say. "I told you so!". 

cheers
chrisC

[Rusty_Springs]

came across something as i was placing the outer magnets around the wheell......

if you start the arc further out, and bring it in closer, then the rod doesnt experience the same "wall" effect.  it is more in the inward direction, where we want the rod to move.

heres an illustration.

Hi Sm0ky2
Ofcause thats right with the repelling magnets and its the opposite for the attracting magnet, as I have pointed out magnets work in halfs with repel the first half pushes the rotor magnet away so it can not come in, the second half pushes the magnet out of the system.
The first half stops it comming in the second half pushes it out so if you angle a magnet so the first half is so far away you have no reaction between the two magnet and the second half is closer because of the angle and you have a reaction between the two magnet then its going to come into the repelling magnet then kick out, if you do the same with attract but angle the opposite way you get the same thing attracting in on the first half, no reaction on the second half so no attract back.
This is what all my gates are based on and thats why you see the same flux with both my gates in your viewers.
Take Care Sm0ky2
Graham