Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

You seem misguided AQ..
it is not i who have made claims to show the world a working wheel.

This thread is not about ORBO . .Steorn or me . 
We are @ll here still waiting/watching to see your  wheel go round and round with out your help.

Let me guess .. you believe you've already completed that task @ hand and the build is now officially over.
Now it's up to all us ordinary folk to figure the rest out for ourselves .. 

hardly, you do not have the configuration of the magnets or the layout of the track for the finished wheel.

Fair enough on the ORBO remark, i never expected an answer, you would need to have one to begin with.

as for what you said about the ferrite is irrellavent it was touching or within field proximatey and glued there, so they were just magnets nothing more no able to be turned on or off, as i said leave the inventing and discoveries to the inventors., it is less embarressing when people look at the videos and know the truth, words cannot defy what the eyes show them, and what they now know to be true about the ferrite. That is my gift, to take the pieces of the puzzles, that others do not know what to do with.

[queue]

as for the isotropic ferrite, you showed the properties of it simply to extend an array for lack of magnets, i as the inventor showed the world how to use it as a switch. having shown someone what paint is does not allow you credit for the masterpice that follows.

i was not hoping for or seeking credit by making the statements,
i already knew you could switch off and on ferrite with a neo, before you ever did.
Read my posts about ferrite you will see that's true.

Rather ..
i was just pointing out that you DID NOT know how to make your original wheel go round, even you claimed herein that you did. You latched onto what i was saying about ferrite as your savior solution to make something work ..
You were seeking any solution you could find.
Further, the point is that you were telling us @ll here at that time that you knew how to make it all work and your actions, floundering about for another solution / any viable solution .. belied your words. 

i need no credit or fame ..  i do not care about that .. and i will always tell the truth here .. even when/if it happens to make you look good.
i do not need your help to cook and i personally have zero interest in ANY of your other stuff ..

i came here to watch you build a working wheel ..
IMO you have not yet completed that task.

[OU-812]

I will give you an example of how pure logic beats repeating the mistakes of millions that have gone before you. when i am unemployed, when i need work fast i do one of two things, i paint or I cook, because iam good at both and it takes seconds to prove it with a quick demonstration.

So why would archer quinn when painting a house do the opposite of every paneter on the planet. it is the practice of all painters to pants the walls and then the frames for doors and windows, why would i do it in reverse. Make no mistake, it is not to be different, it is time money and perfection.

so with the thousands of readers, tell me the answer

you will see why the very best of thousands of years of experts in a field, do not equate to someone who can out think them. scinece is no different, thousands of years of experts mean nothing if someone is smarter.

So why do i do it in reverse.? I will have a look tonight and see if anyone can give me the amswer, hell pick up a phone and ask a painter why you would do it, that is relevent to time and money and quality.

OMG.  My wife and I are freakin' geniuses!!  Didn't realize it until you pointed it out.  We do the trim/baseboard first with a sprayer THEN do the walls (not with the sprayer of course).  That way you get a perfect/clean line along the edges.  We've been doing this for years now remodeling and selling homes but didnt' realize we were painting savants!

This is the comical part of AQ's claims.  He never bothers to do any research but assumes he is the first in te world to do everything.  Funny.

[OU-812]

it is the practice of all painters to pants the walls and then the frames for doors and windows, why would i do it in reverse. Make no mistake, it is not to be different, it is time money and perfection.

so with the thousands of readers, tell me the answer

you will see why the very best of thousands of years of experts in a field, do not equate to someone who can out think them. scinece is no different, thousands of years of experts mean nothing if someone is smarter.

So why do i do it in reverse.? I will have a look tonight and see if anyone can give me the amswer, hell pick up a phone and ask a painter why you would do it, that is relevent to time and money and quality.

OH I forgot.  "show me a website of someone doing it before I enlightened the world"

So a quick search on this new fangled website called Google:

1.)  http://www.essortment.com/home/householdpainti_sbdt.htm (step 4 trim, step 5,6 walls...what do you know, trim first)

2.)  http://www.rd.com/familyhandyman/content/73402/ (OMG, #10)

What do you know.  How did that happen.  Did they just update their website after hearing this great revelation??

[ThothTheSecond]

We've veered way off topic, but I have to admit I have never met a painter professional or otherwise who has painted the wall field first.

Sorry AQ, I'm a big supporter of your quest for FE, but I'll have to disagree on this one.

I'd like to take this opportunity to thank 4Tesla for his Vizimag images on the Trigate thread, nice work, especially the last few.