Roll on the 20th June

[dirt diggler]

does Hans Von Liven live around there anywhere? I'm not sure of his creds, but he might be the man.
GO ARCHER!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi All
A show on Australain TV called today tonight may be interested in Archers challenge heres the web site if anyone wants to find out if there interested and want to check it out. http://au.tv.yahoo.com/tv/seven/
Take Care All
Graham

[purepower]

Oh Archer, I am here to stay, failure or success. Unlike you, I dont put my tail between my legs and scurry off in the face of a challenge.

Seriously though, if you wish to put an end to this mess, why dont you post a video? Measure the arms, show us it is has no hidden features, show us the weights, place them on the lever, and be the savior of the world. I truly appreciate the offer to have it tested, but I think finding a professor to do this will be the Newtonians' only shortcoming.

And to ramset, you really don't listen/read. I am not an opponent to FE/OU, I am just an opponent to lies...


ATTENTION ALL. If you are in contact with any physics professors in Australia near Boronia, please contact Archer Quinn (The Eskimo Quinn) as soon as possible. He has offered to allow his device to be tested before Tuesday, 10 June 2008. This is a very important offer and would bring to rest much debate.

(as promised)

[exxcomm0n]

So what is the big deal if people still want to try? Some people just seem to miss the fun aspect of all this and the enjoyment that some sad people like me get from trying to replicate others ideas.

It takes all sorts in the world, I do not understand how someone has the patience to build replica toy models with such great detail and skill, yet they do and they get their buzz out of it, so good on them, I will not judge them, not my place and they are not hurting anyone, just doing their thing.

I<snip>
You are taught from an early age in school to do practical as well as theory while experimenting. That seems to get lost as people grow older, which is a shame.

<snip>
Cheers

Sean.

Hmmmmm....why would I build a toy?
Why waste that time and effort?

1.) I want to see it work, or not work. The materials for a toy are cheaper than larger scale.
2.) I want OTHERS to make a toy, with materials as base and ugly as mine and see it work, or not work.
3.) I want to teach people how to LEARN, not how to recite.

Please do not take this as an affront. It's not meant to be.
But there are some great toys out there I've learned from.

Ball and cup for instance.
Centrifugal force, vector acceleration, the speed of weights attraction to gravity.

Legos, tinker toys, chemistry sets, telescopes, kites,.....the list goes on.

Let's just say I like toys.

@exxcomm0n

You said:

"Ummmmm...then why did the people and cartoon characters mentioned above do it?
Perhaps to teach those not quite hip to algebraic equations the concept.

People believing it might have some merit have been said to be fools.
How many fools you know that reason algebraically?

I'll say it again............slowly.

Show...........................me."

I am the one in the cartoon (and the one you are quoting) and I carry no burden of proof because I speak from the convention, and you are correct.  I do still provide proof to my statements "to teach those not quite hip to algebraic equations the concept."

As this (educating) is my goal for the site, what exactly would you like me to explain or show you?

@ purepower

I would like it if you could show a working example of any of your opposing theories, please.
Be our Mr. Wizard. I've already done my part as "Timmy".

<psssst> The operative word is "show".

@ all

Now please forgive me the following verbage.

@ The Eskimo Quinn

Mighty TALL order for verification there bud, and one I hope an Aussie fellow member can muster up to!

Being that I'm self employed, I'd volunteer except for funds and diploma.
Not sure anyone here would trust my observations and recordings anyway.

I have to admit, at least you are providing the opportunity for the one thing I keep bitching about like a skipping CD.

Physical proof.

P.S. IT'S YOUR FILTHY FUCKING ROCK TOO!

@ all again

Can anyone from AU do this?
I will contribute to your transport costs. I'm sure others will too.
Isn't there a debunker who could go?
(Please record all video footage on DVDR format so that it is admissible as evidence against tampering.)


@ DarkStar

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg98895.html#msg98895

I don't see why it couldn't work, although I have no formula as proof. Give it a shot man!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg98895.html#msg102237

This one I'm still not sure what you mean.

[purepower]

Hans Von Liven does not appear on any Australian people searches. If this thing is tested by a professor, I would like to know what university he is employed by so we all may know this person actually exists and is not another Archurian fabrication. I would also like his professional email so I may contact him and verify his findings.

If Archer says he confirmed the findings, this proves nothing as multiple "engineers" have already. If this person contacts me, I will readily pass all data on to the public.



ATTENTION ALL. If you are in contact with any physics professors in Australia near Boronia, please contact Archer Quinn (The Eskimo Quinn) as soon as possible. He has offered to allow his device to be tested before Tuesday, 10 June 2008. This is a very important offer and would bring to rest much debate.