Roll on the 20th June

[canuck22]

I have a question

Now please follow me for a bit here. As shown and talked about, a arm on a wheel of equal length from center and with equal weight on each end will find a balance at 9 and 3 oclock.

As I understand it, you need to move the weight at 9 oclock towards the center of the wheel
for the wheel to become unbalance and then to rotate.

Consider that the wheel is moving in a clockwise rotation. I have read every post here and it seems
everyone agrees that the weight loses all kinetic energy at about the 7 oclock position.

I have not posted due to not wanting to feel stupid, and I have tried to draw this, but I have not been
able to figure this drawing program out.

So to the question.

How far to center would you have to move the weight for the wheel to turn, and for the wheel to continue to turn?

My idea is to put a sliding weight on the arm and to use a cam to move and hold the weight at the center when it arrives at the 7 oclock position and then to move it out to the end of the arm when it arrives at the 1 or 2 oclock position.


Any ideas as to if you think this would work?

peter

[JuJu]

yeah, i do the same question, everybody forget the wheel and are looking like all just trying to see who have the bigger dick*!!

i will love to see archer rocking into the future!!! you are the free men, BRING DOWN THE OIL MEN!!

Let There Be Light!!

Dear Mr. Archer Quinn,

Congratulations on building a lever!  One question, how is the over-unity free-energy for the world wheel coming along?  I would love to see a video of that working...

Brother John

[am1ll3r]

I have not posted due to not wanting to feel stupid, and I have tried to draw this, but I have not been
able to figure this drawing program out.

Here is my attempt at a drawing   It helps me understand what I think is supposed to be happening.
Thanks.

[spinner]

onezeros so what you are saying {not being a wise guy here ]  is there is no advantage in a machine   doing more work with a shorter lever?   or more work done with less effort ?

ramset, Archer's Egyptian fulcrum concept is dead... So is thermal accelerator... And a syphon thingy... And I am deadly serious.
Archer's magneto-gravity wheel is doable, but it will never self-sustain, so it is not an Over-Unity device (in the configuration like it was presented)...
Having a perpetual motion 2 years ago was A LIE - and you mustn't be surprised that so many skeptics jumped on it... Anyway, do you see skeptics flodding other threads here?

If any of Archer's concepts come into fruition AND IS OFFICIALLY (independent qualifyed lab tests) RECOGNISED AS 'OVERUNITY', I'll pay you (yes, to you, ramset!) 1000 EUR! This is from my savings, currently dedicated for a (partial) HEATING OIL BILL FOR THE FOLLOWING WINTER... (I'm not saying this lightly and I'm not hiding behind my handle - there are people in this forum who knows my real name).

Just to let you know - next winter I'll probably spend some 3000 Eur for my family house gas/oil heating bill. This is killing me...
SO IF I HEAR AGAIN ONE MORE TIME THAT I'M A BIG-OIL FE SUPRESSOR OR DEBUNKER, I'LL HAVE NO MERCY...

Why do you still think that believers/skeptics is always positive/negative??? This is so wrong.
In the past there was a device/concept where I was believer, too,  so I know the emotions involved...

Cheers!

[canuck22]

am1 thank you for that drawing

the cam needs to be on the inside of the weights after the 12 oclock position

peter