Roll on the 20th June

[helmut]

well I guess the boss  [and the Forum] is drawing a crowd   my posts are on a ten minute delay   well what really Bites  is Im staying where there is no internet service and univercity is closing down the net in the library in ten Minutes  stinks working where there is no internet @Helmut now I know how you feel   Chet  PS I  hope all is well I

Hello Chet

Everything is fine so far.But i have to make a lot of homework to do.

helmut

[spinner]

@exxcommon
"Again....another broad brush painter."
Thanks. I'll answer YOU after the 20th...

@ramset
I somehow knew you wouldn't except the offer... You're the man with principles, no doubt about it. And I think it is noble to stick with your decision. And I like your "subscription" (sorry, i can't find a word), dedicated to your grandma... I think you're a good guy! Even though we're not on the same "wavelength"...  Cheers!

>>@spinner is there any wall to a lever [such as the wall in magnets] a place that you stop because the effort is less than the work out    ARCHER claims to be able to recycle his lever it seems at 5-1  with 1 unit moving 20 units this is possible ? and how can you say impossible without knowing the complete design<<

I may not know the complete design, but from what i saw untill now, this is a dead end. A 5:1 lever and 1:20 weight lift is a misconception (in OU terms)... Please, read previous posts.

[spinner]

"Hey, famous Leonardo daVinci made the first analysis of a 'gravity wheel'.... Without trigonometry... His findings are still valid - the gravity impact on a weight fixed at the circumference of the wheel is proportional with the horizontal displacement of the weights from the axle... "Anno Domini  1490".... Imagine that.
More than 500 years ago... And today we're still strugling with the lever mechanics...."




Da Vinci's wheel was a failure. Today "we" are not struggling with lever mechanics, the "Archurians" are...

Doh.. I know who is strugling with  lever mechanics, seriously.
Da Vinci's wheel(s) were a failure. But my point was that he recognised the mistake (you may insert his famous quote translation here) and analysed it the best as he can... Ergo?
He WAS THE FIRST MAN WHO ANALYSED THE GRAVITY WHEEL!
And, according to your post from a day back, you may be the next one...
Cheers!

[Evg]

I was in the dark and I am beginning to see the light (I think) at the end of the tunnel. I just began to see the principal behind the fulcrum. As the fulcrum is fixed well below the central swinging pivot of the system, the fulcrum is the weight itself without an opposite weight.
Since the fulcrum is quiet heavy and balanced (mostly). The fulcrum acts like a pendulum hanging on the bottom of a (central pivoting) wheel (kind of). So the fulcrum purpose is to become a self motivating pendulum to rock the real system through 20 degrees up and down. I am looking at the whole system just to see why the fulcrum could/would work.God I hate being stupid!

[kremlin01]

The Mighty Quinn, 'and still they watched, and still their wonder grew'
And still they deny what they see, may you bask in in the glory that I believe should be yours, come the 20th.

Regards Bren.