Roll on the 20th June

[DrWhat]

Criticize as much as you all like: at least he's giving it a go. I'm not saying I agree with his comments, reasoning etc, but at least he is building and experimenting.

I've sent him an email on how to improve his design somewhat. Lets see where this goes...

[boblow]

@Bulbz

Yes, I just joined up as a noob, because I just had to comment on Quinn's total nonsense. I went through the math on his webpage - hilarious home made logic - and I couldn't help myself.

@Spinner

"The less you know about "current science" the more probable your FE invention is..."
Hmmmm...well...I think that says it all. That is the kind of logic most perpetual motion people work with. However, that will not make your "machines" work. Your machine doesn't care about whether you know or not know anything about physics. You are wasting your time. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE. It can not work.
Go back to school and pay attention this time.

And take a look at his "sword of god" videos. He hasn't even got mechanical skills. His model is very poorly assembled.

He doesn't know the math, and he doesn't know how to use tools and different materials.

[shakman]

Here's my updated diagram for the anti-clockwise side of the wheel, with the arms in the right place now.
Sorry for the delay, a combo of needing sleep and CorelDRAW fighting me to do this were the main reasons.

@exxcomm0n
I made the  illustrations using CorelDRAW and the most recent pics Archer has uploaded. If nothing else it has help me sharpen my vector graphics skills
Thanks for the advice on attacking the bitter one's in here, but I can't help myself 

@Boblow
Archer may or may not have this all wrong, but Einstein, Tesla, and many other great scientists and engineers over time have always had their work criticized by other scientists - REAL scientists, not armchair scientists like you and me. And they often proved them wrong and another chapter was added to Physics 101. This is what made them great. Archer is having a go, all you do is having a go at people. But at least you're letting me sharpen my debating skills (and my tongue).

@All people making personal verbal attacks against Archer
Please try to be constructive in your posts. If you are going to make personal attacks on Archer, try creating your own blog or something (maybe sciencebitch.blogspot.com might suit). The guy is having a go. People may have tried similar concepts before. They may have even tried identical concepts before. Didn't Tesla and Marconi claim to discover how to utilise certain radio signals at almost exactly the same time? So it's very likely Archer thought this up himself and he is sharing his ideas like everyone else on overunity.com. Others may have failed, maybe Archer can get it to work. He seems confident enough of this. If there is anyone else on this site that has a working OU/perpetual motion device then why are we even arguing? Archer is making us think and debate. There is need to make personal attacks on Mr. Quinn. If you so desire, make them at me. At least I have time to reply and defend myself.

Shakman

PS No, I'm not a scientist (okay - I'm an "armchair scientist"). But despite dropping science as a subject at high school for my senior years I was still begged to be a member of the school's scientific debating team (yes, there was an inter-school science debating competition believe it or not) in my senior year (Year 12 for the Aussie's). I didn't join though, I was too busy playing Rugby League and letting my shoulders do the talking. I've been out of the game a long time now (science longer than footy) but the brain and the shoulders still work fine.

[spinner]

Criticize as much as you all like: at least he's giving it a go. I'm not saying I agree with his comments, reasoning etc, but at least he is building and experimenting.

I've sent him an email on how to improve his design somewhat. Lets see where this goes...

Nothing wrong with building and experimenting. NOTHING AT ALL!!! Even if the work goes against current knowledge or simply common sense.. Nothing wrong with that. There are many enthusiasts, 'FE' researchers,.. who are doing it right now.. All arround the world. And not even one single "skeptic, debunker, BigOil, Illuminaty,..." person is attacking them...

But if one claimes he has a runner, a 'real thing' - a perpetual motion device, and at the same time ridicules all the knowledge, great scientists, and all the questioning bystanders, then....

Look, I know (like many others) AQ was lying about having a PM device 2 years ago... He proposed a few additional OU concepts, which were just a conformation of his delusions. "Thermal accelerator, syphon, Egyptian fulcrum" are simply "too easy debunkable things"... Theese are all very simple to reproduce devices, so if anyone believes they may work, please, replicate... It will be a good lesson.

A month ago I evaluate Archer's M/G wheel as a workable, but very UNDERUNITY design. I offered a help to make it less underunity in few of my posts... No replies. So, keep replicating, eventually you'll find out the truth.

[Bobbotov]

I think you guys have pinned your hopes and dreams on a bipolar manic-depressive. He has all of the classic signs - the flurry of super intense activity, the rages, the threats of leaving only to come back. He doesn't need to adjust the wheel just his meds. I mean he is simultaneously building this wheel, shooting video, converting video and uploading, maintaining his website and posting here (and as possibly multiple personalities). That is a classic manic state. And as can be seen for all, he is not doing any of those activities very well.

Imagine if you will a person like Archer acting the way he does explaining how to build a mousetrap exhibiting the behavior he has. Nothing arcane just a simple utilitarian object. You would all think him nuts but because he is dealing with FE he is somehow given a pass and you seem to think this psycho drama is worth it. I wonder if his delusions aren't contagious.

I am all for free energy, who isn't? It's up there with free food, free booze, free love , etc.... But you all need lessons in critical thinking before embarking on the hitherto impossible. Before building an FE device you need to first build a high quality crap detector. Otherwise the only thing perpetual you will achieve is chasing your own tail ad infinitum. Archer's math alone should have been the tip off, his rants and anti-social behavior notwithstanding.

Enthusiasm is great until you realize that it is being wasted on folly. That is if you are capable of understanding folly when you encounter it. Magnetic wheels are the new alchemy. Someone in this thread said that if FE is possible it will come from Quantum Mechanics. To me that is probably where it will come from if even possible not spinning magnetic wheels. How many here can start doing QM experiments with the math to back it up or are you just like Ham radio enthusiasts where playing with hardware is what it is all about? That is fine too but don't expect any earth shattering breakthroughs.

I have followed FE for about two years and I have never seen anything that even comes close to doing what is expected. It is not the pursuit of the Holly Grail it is chasing the pot of gold at the end of a rainbow.