Roll on the 20th June

[utilitarian]

we all know??? you are a fucking liar . . .

To borrow from Kevin Spacey (as Ron Klain) speaking to Denis Leary's character in "Recount", did anyone ever tell you that you say "fuck" a lot?

By the way, no rush on the device.  We have waited this long, what's another week or two.  Not a big deal.  I'm serious.

[fletcher]

I can hardly be bothered replying to you quinn but I'm am reasonably patient so I will anyway, because it amuses me - FYI, I didn't keep nor could I be bothered keeping cached pages of your site [some did, for prosterity] - a troll thru those might prove interesting reading for comparison purposes at some time - besides me remembering the essence of what you said & wrote accurately, you would also be implying that others, including sm0ky, are also grossly mistaken then ? - I don't think so ! - the quote in red about your first wheel 2 years ago being an electromagnetic wheel was directly pulled from your site this afternoon - a direct copy & paste [at that time, if it hasn't changed again] - you might have a few others scratching their heads wondering just what they actually originally heard amongst the melee of the last 85 pages, but not me sonny boy - no matter, fast forwarding to today, produce the goods to back up your drooling ramblings - whatza matter, a little doubt drying up the inflow of funds ?

Also, you will note that I asked for others verification of something I had read on another forum - now, I know you can read but obviously comprehension isn't your strongest hand.

As for being an oilman & a stooge - ROTFLMAO, you crack me up !

P.S. sorry to the other members for the temporary diversion from the more important stuff.

[DarkStar_DS9]

When was I wrong before?

See my post http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg107483.html#msg107483

If you try to do the math, you should see where you have been wrong. If you don't, build it. So either you are wrong, or I was able to build a lever using toys (Fischer Technik) that does not adhere to the laws of physics.

What's even worse, nobody else cried BS on this one (or did I miss it?), even though there are tons of "experts" around who have been quick to debunk Archer's lever. Hell, I even built a lever where you can mount a weight so that it will "stick out" horizontally and NOT act  as an extension to the beam.

Excuse me, but I feel I am just as qualified as the next guy.

Exactly. You are as qualified as the next guy - e.g. Archer or any of his "followers". So whatever you "prove", it is only your opinion, not fact. Math is fine, but does not prove anything if applied the wrong way.

Don't get me wrong here: I'm not saying "don't listen to anything PP says because he is an idiot and does not know what he is talking about". I am saying "don't believe something just because someone said it, for he might have been wrong about it". Remain sceptical, try it yourself. If you can replicate it, you may start to think it can actually work.

Everyone knows I am completely objective and unbiased in my analysis, and have no reason to skew the results one way on another.

*cough* since when? You most certainly are NOT unbiased. You have a certain area of expertise, and you try to explain everything that is going on based on the "few" things that you know (or: think you know). Remember my electromagnets? You never answered http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg102688.html#msg102688 - or did I miss that (again)?

I think what you need to learn is to say "I don't know", because at times you sound like you are so full of yourself that you think you are infallible.

Regards,

Rainer

[helmut]

@All
I t might be waisted time, but i try to appeal for peace.
Here we overcame the Wall of Babylon.

Please start thinking once more about the great advantage of the new age.

It is urgend, we need help to deadict us from centralised energy supplyers, all over the world,  at the same time.
If there is a chance of woldwide freedom to mankind, the core of a movement of this kind,  can be born here.
We do not need a new world order, because we create the peacefull relationship right here, right now.
Lets have respect to eachother.
We need Free Energy as soon as possible.
Whatch the TV . See people without health care, without food and without future, as a result of war and crime.

Lets make use of our education to overcame the wall of arrogance.

As i see this  Forum is a Platform to introduce Ideas, News,  share some knowlege and learn from eachother.
As far as i know, it is free to everyone to place his own thread.
Make use of it and post your Ideas to your own thread.
Dont bring your terror of distruction in here.

Leave archer alone do not disturb him or others ,that work on their ideas.
We need free thinking Inventors.

with respect to all

helmut

[gwhy!]

Graham is right, its the field from the corner of the gates wrapping back around, meaning your set-up is not perfectly corect, as i tried to state earlier....

Also, using the "common-ball" method like you have here, changes the entire gate mechanics. you need to have each gate its own triangle, then stick them together ball-to-ball. common-ball works better around curves, but for a straight line, i wouldn't reccomend it.

(p.s. i have about $100 worth of geomags here, was playing with these gates for months since Graham released it)

Hi Sm0ky2,
     Thanks for the input, I have not done very little with the ball-to-ball setup always thought it didn't produce as much throughput as the common ball method. Ok so looks like I got the terminology wrong about the attract back but thats what it does. I have tried various common ball configurations  lengths and widths and to be honest there is always that ( what I call the ) attract back at the end. I will have to have a play with the seperate gate configs now so I can see the differences for myself.

(p.s. SORRY a $100 worth of geomags dont impress me and dont make you correct but point taken about the field from the corner of the gates wrapping back around ( attract back  ))