Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

<snip>
@Exx

Its called a switch. He can tie it in to the rotation of the wheel so the connection is made from the coil to the generator when needed, similar to an old distributor cap on a car before they went computer controlled.

And if he must have a buffer, I suppose a good size capacitor would do the trick. He would have to show readings on the cap before and after say, 10-20 rotations.

He has claimed to have a lot of toys working. At this point, I think we all deserve to see something in action that he has claimed, toy or pro, old or new. He's received quite a bit of money with nothing shown or to show.

I know he should finish what he started instead of jumping from project to project as he has been. But when are people going to hold him accountable for his promises and their investments?

-PurePower

@ Pure

Old distributor caps are not switches. The "points" that were usually in them, are. Look up "points dwell" and see how things were done before EFIE.

Bud, if you have this clear and incisive view of the thing and how it should be built, do it and prove it faster than Archer.
If you're still grinding that ax, I can't think of a better way to humiliate Archer than to beat him at his own game.
Otherwise, quit with the condescending "It's called a switch"-type stuff.

K?

How's the Batmobile thread coming?

Are you talking about Archer?

Yes, we skeptics watch in amazement as the believers refuse to acknowledge the indisputable facts as they unfold before them.

FACT 1: Archer lied about having built a successful perpetual motion machine 2 years ago.

@ newt

You were there? You saw it? If not, I can't see that as a fact.

FACT 2: Archer failed to deliver a working perpetual motion machine as promised on June 20th, 2008.

True.

FACT 3: Archer is soliciting and accepting money to fund his new perpetual motion machine construction.

True.

FACT 4: Archer refuses to publicly admit that he lied about ever having a working perpetual motion machine.

If you can't prove he didn't have one, this is false as well.

FACT 5: Archer is no closer to achieving perpetual motion than anyone else on the entire planet.

Unless you have better factual analysis than you have demonstrated so far, I'll have to rack this one up as false too.

You should really look up the difference between fact and supposition.
You might have "feelings" that 1, 4, & 5 are true, but that hardly supports the label of "Fact".

That is absolute trash. He is an egomaniac doing it for his delusional self. He is a one man Three Stooges act. The investors are suckers a la PT Barnum. This entire episode is an example of the lunatic fringe in high gear. and I will always piss and moan when I see insanity creeping into the world and being passed off as legitimate and worth consideration. You, on the other hand are part of the problem, so get used to push back. And I give a rat's ass if it pisses you off. So feel free to piss off.

@ Bobbo

Then why do you keep coming back? We might feel your contributions and content add up to the same.

Where do you get the "rats asses" that you give them so freely?

[AB Hammer]

WOW there is always a new twist to this string. It is becoming the OU soap opera. This person don't understand me. Will we ever figure out who put the magnet where? Another person leaving and never coming back but shows back up in the next episode.  LMAO LMAO

No offense intended, but I just had to say it.

[shakman]

WOW there is always a new twist to this string. It is becoming the OU soap opera. This person don't understand me. Will we ever figure out who put the magnet where? Another person leaving and never coming back but shows back up in the next episode.  LMAO LMAO

No offense intended, but I just had to say it.

I agree. I have also found this very entertaining. It's more like a reality TV show because we all get to contribute.

However it would be nice if the people who won't believe in this device until a working model is sitting in their very own living room would stop clogging up this thread though. As much fun as the banter has been, there are probably only about 30 pages of constructive content from a handful of people. I thought the basis of this forum was to assist and encourage people who are working on possible OU/FE devices to try to achieve this goal. It seems a lot of people are only here to do the opposite.

I understand there may have been a few scammers who have tried to fleece members of this forum before but Archer Quinn is clearly not one of these people. So anyone who is hijacking this thread for any purpose other than to talk constructively about the device (or to defend Archer, as many have had to do lately) then I don't believe you belong here. These people need to spend their time contributing to a thread where they would be more productive and end the "soap opera" that this has become.

I take my hat off to the moderators for keeping this thread open and allowing people who believe this may work to continue to discuss the idea despite all of the noise created by some and despite the best efforts of some to try to have the thread locked.

Regards,

shakman

[purepower]

Ya, I know I said I wouldn't come back. But the way I see it, the "old" PurePower isnt coming back. I'm here now not as a skeptic or a supporter, just someone who wants to see some FE!

@Exx

Sorry I sounded negative with the switches bit. We've been on good terms and I'd like to keep it that way.

A switch is defined as a mechanical device used to connect and disconnect a circuit at will (wiki). So how is an old distributor not a switch? I dunno, I don't want to get picky with terms because I am not an automotive or electrical engineer, but you understand my suggestion. I don't build the electromag device for one simple reason: AQ must be smarter than me because I don't think it work. So like you and everyone else here, I would like to learn. But so far nothing has been taught...


Archer claiming FE is similar to the "water cutting steal" demo as mentioned above. It is similar in that someone claims to be able to do something seemingly impossible. It is similar because even the skeptics tag along for the ride and enjoy the show.

It is different, however, because there was nothing prior that mathematically and scientifically proved it impossible, it just "seemed" impossible. It was also different because the inventor actually demonstrated what he claimed.

Sure AQ has had a few bumps along the way just like the water guy, and everyone is still sticking around just in case he makes it. However, if the water guy had failed, people would have given up on him by the end of the day. It been 2 weeks today since Archer was supposed to produce. Just wondering how much longer we are going to have to wait...

Again, at this point my stance is totally neutral. I want to learn and know something I didnt before. I, along with many others, have just grown a little impatient and am trying to speed things along.



If AQ lives up to his promises by July 16, four weeks past the deadline, I will donate $100 as a thank you/appology to AQ. Any other "skeptics" or non-cheerleaders want to add to the pool to help speed things along?

-PurePower



-PurePower

[FreeEnergy]

THIS THREAD SHOULD BE DELETED ALL TOGETHER!