Roll on the 20th June

[Rusty_Springs]

Nice and mature mate. Did you fight over icecreams in the playground?
And yep, I masturbate occasionally. It's great. You should try it, you sound like someone who needs to get a load off.

PS I hope you liked my pretty picture, seeing as you're clearly incapable of comprehending it.

lol its called humour you moron, man you make me laugh your just a big joke lmao

[purepower]

@PP

If you will allow me to name a few topics I will wipe the floor with you on, one would be English and the other would be Law (which includes Fraud Investigation).
Allow me to give you a quick lesson in each.

To give you a fair I will treat you and P-Motion as separate individuals as I state the facts.

- You both share the same local timezone
- The coincidence that P-Motion stopped posting on June 29, 2008, , and was discussing a gravity powered wheel
- The subject of P-Motion's last post was "Free energy from gravitation using Newtonian Physic" (sic)
- P-Motion's last post on said date was conveniently edited with "not sure when I will be on-line again" - has not been back since
- You only joined OverUnity.com on June 03, 2008 - over a week after this thread started
- You are utterly convinced Archer's wheel can not/will not/must not break "Newtonian Physic" (sic)
- I've analyzed speech patterns and typo's in your posts and P-Motion's and they appear to be from the one person
   (allow me to point out one such post which everyone will agree looks just like most of yours here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1995.0.html)

I may be wrong but based on the evidence I find the evidence overwhelmingly in favour of Archer Quinn in this matter.

Allow me to elaborate a little and tell you the way I think this went down. I can only assume that the efforts required to carry on assuming both identities became far to great for you on June 29, 2008 so you decided to put P-Motion to rest for long enough to derail Archer, steal all of his ideas and return to the "Free energy from gravitation using Newtonian Physic" thread as magically as you disappeared a hero showing all that you've learnt and achieved during your time away.

Now you're chewing up my sleeping time. I should be in bed, not teaching some kid/old man/whoever you are (let's just say for the sake of anonymity someone out there with a below average IQ). Go and masquerade somewhere else.

shakman

Pure coincidence. I honestly have never heard if him or that thread until now. You probably don't believe me, but I really don't care.

I stand behind everything I say and have no need or desire to use two names.

Ask harti to check the ip addresses the posts were coming from to see if they are the same. I guess thats the only way to prove I am not "pmotion."

-PurePower

[TinselKoala]

Wow again, I just watched the second remake. That's pretty impressive!!
No doubt about that one direction, even if it wouldn't go the other way.
Listen, could you do one more video, sort of as a "baseline."
That roller is a bunch of magnets, right? I don't remember if you said the big balls were magnets too, they are, aren't they?
Anyway, Archer, could you please take off all the magnets on the outside of the track, I mean just remove them all, and then start the roller in the same place as before, and video what it does. I just want to make sure the outer magnets are helping as much as they seem to.
It's an easy experiment to do, sort of like what they call a "control" experiment, although I can't understand why, who's in control anyway.
But it would be interesting, don't you think?

[exxcomm0n]

@ Archer

I REALLY hate to do this, but I think you're mistaken on this one bro.

The writing style is all wrong.

It has a much older tone "when i was at Boeing" and stuff like that.

PureP uses automatic carriage return provided the computer age, P-motion still is using typewriter skills for his paragraphs, is worse at punctuation, and just some other things.

It don't feel right, but I don't give enough of a shit about him do the research necessary to have a full picture and prove it one way or the other.
I have no respect for him anymore.

If someone would like to hire me to, my services might come cheaper than normal.



I'm NOT doing this to bail the little pissant out, I just really think this ones a stretch.

If it IS possible (and only Stephan has the power to see IPs posted from in the database to get a little corroborating evidence), this little bastard is REALLY good!!

To the point bordering on multiple personalities.

I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm saying it's highly improbable.

We can still burn him down  with his ".....but on page 53 it says...." type content.

EDIT

@ shak

Kinda the same thing, but I will differ to you a bit as you done the homework, and I dropped the class.

EDIT2

@ shak

I'll take a look at your graphics and descriptions soon. I tried earlier, but my discipline was worn thin.

Not that i can have any worthwhile input, but I keep trying.

[shakman]

lol its called humour you moron, man you make me laugh your just a big joke lmao

Last post before I duck off....

Mate, my footy coach used to use the same joke. It's not new. And it's not all that funny. The fact that you lead with 'moron' didn't make it any more funny. If I wasn't way overdue for bed I'd give you a lesson in grammar and context. At least my coach used it tongue-in-cheek.

And yep, I could play footy and debate - both very well. So I've probably got you covered on all bases. Sad to be you.