Roll on the 20th June

[Rusty_Springs]

Notice how RS is smoothly playing the "if this works after all it's all because of me" tune, it's very subtle but if you listen good enough you hear it  .

Hi Broli
Its on record that the principle was on the net way before Archer used it and it was me that put them there at first before others moved them around also I am on the record saying it doesn't and wont work so why am I puting claim to something I know wont work.
What I'm pointing out is Archer has nothing and it using other peoples ideas to get money.
Take Care Broli
Graham

[Rusty_Springs]

Graham   so you don't believe the array Archer has built will run a wheel as is?  Chet

Hi Chet
I'm not sorry to say this answer to Archer but I am for you and the other that are investing in Archer and the answer is Yes I don't beleave it will even do one loop.
Take Care Chet
Graham

[shakman]

Now tell me, how does the bike with less banked energy allow you to ride with less the same user energy than the bike with more banked energy?

-PurePower

Alright, you will be tempted to skim this, but I urge you to read it as I will pose a question at the end that you can only answer correctly by doing so.

What Exx is saying, a point that I agree with, is that some work went in to making the bike. The bike can now be used over and over until the wheels come off. In terms of conservation of energy in physics, it's not a fair argument so I won't go there. The point is that the energy and time put in to making the bike is far less than the energy it will save the user of that bike should it be used regularly.

So a device was built using x total energy. y total energy is used to operate the device but it saves z total energy over other alternatives and at the same time allows more "work" to be done. Initially x+y will far outweigh z, but over time this will inverse, and over a long time z will be many multiples of x+y.

So the banked energy argument goes: a device was built as a method to conserve energy over the long term an, in some cases, even the short-to-immediate term. It would not be fair to use this argument in the context you continually wish to use it, but you are taking it out of context to serve your own argument. But please answer this question with a Yes/No before using rhetoric - is the paragraph previous to this (xyz) wrong in any way?

shakman

[gwhy!]

Nope. "This video is currently not supported on the iPhone." I haven't figured out why some of his work and others dont, possibly compression formats?

Would you mind describing it to me, in detail?

-PurePower

Oh dear PP "iPhone"  shame, you have always come over as quite smart to.  .

same as the other vid but placing the roller mag between 10-11, no push or shove, roller got pulled round the top of the loop then out past the end of the track but dont make it to the start again he is claiming he needs more mags to make the track a bit longer.

[ramset]

PURE POWER he has his flimsy track stuck to the chair   he starts the mag lift at about 10 to show the lift up it sucks out of his hand and pulls up over and out crashing off to the side at speed he does this 3 times Chet