Roll on the 20th June

[ramset]

HELMUT thanks for bringing that up[ the pay pal link] im working out of town and the wife said she took care of this, this morning   now im not so sure will be home manana will check  Chet

[OU-812]

If his loop loops Then why over engineer it as you have done, why have moving rods? why have levers ? just a rotor with 2 or more arms with fixed mags on the end working the exact same way as in his last vid.

Ah but his loop DOESN'T fully loop.  Just a partial loop which fits in with the master plan diagramed.  That would explain why he feels OU/FE was achieved with a partial loop (because in context of his other 'partial' OU/FE victories it becomes a complete circuit).   

[shakman]

Hi shakman,
   I think I would like to also add, not everything needs to be shouted about for example I can make a rotor go though and beyond 360 degrees from a standing start and not initially being pulled or push via mags and not using gravity !. now when I first done this I thought woohoo ( like you do. well I did    ). But I soon realised there was a problem with the design and the rotor would get stuck at about 400degrees ( which I'm working on ) Now I'm new to this so this may be good or not but I didn't think there was any point in telling peeps at this point. So my point is chill and stay opened minded until proved or not. There is no point in saying its new cos its probably isn't,  and have been tried before

@Gwhy
Nice work. I would too. But please in future do shout about these things. It might be a missing piece of a puzzle that someone is close to solving. And that same person could very well have a piece you are missing. That's the idea of these forums.

I agree we with staying chilled, hell when I'm not at work getting fired up on this forum I'm kicking back with a beer. But if you can't find anyone else saying they've done and showing how, please share. Share is caring after all 

Anyway, we'll agree to disagree about Archer maybe/maybe not having something here. It sounds like you may be on the way to some discoveries of your own if you put a bit of faith in yourself and start sharing and receiving bits of the puzzle.

Peace.

shakman

[The Eskimo Quinn]

@rusty, the principal was on the net way before i used it.

come on liar stop mouthing off an show everyone where it is, see you are still claiming your mag pics showing the poles face up with a donut mag as the same thing, wow you really do live in la la land champ.

Show everyone this pre existing principal, if it is old even show it in written form in some old post.

as for knowing it would not work, didnt you know it would not go over the loop when you said it went over a couple of mags at 80 degrees but said it kept stopping, but then did not stop and wnet over the loop?

did you not say that it would not work when it hung at the end of the first loop vid as i could not break the wall

did you not agrre with purepower that it could not work because it looses energy at the  first wall break vids

now you say when it done all that and simply need to roll along a flat ramp to the base to the start it wont work??

didnt think of that did you moron? yeah i can flatten the base without using more magnets tyo get to the other side, once out how it gets back to the start is moot. remember it being pulled accross the flat wood without coming off a hill?

yeah your a real genius at seeing what is going on.

Your own mag setup is nothing like this, and no one else in the world would put their name to that claim once they see the poles are face up and your roller is an extnernal pole magnet because it is a ring.

leave whilst you still have some dignity, when they see the next video, what will you say then?

Not i was wrong, you have had 3 chances to do that, yet you simply gloss over your cliams that get destroyed.

You know i never play nice, so be careful what you say about it not making the loop,

Don't bring knives to gunfights champ.

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi shakman,
   I think I would like to also add, not everything needs to be shouted about for example I can make a rotor go though and beyond 360 degrees from a standing start and not initially being pulled or push via mags and not using gravity !. now when I first done this I thought woohoo ( like you do. well I did    ). But I soon realised there was a problem with the design and the rotor would get stuck at about 400degrees ( which I'm working on ) Now I'm new to this so this may be good or not but I didn't think there was any point in telling peeps at this point. So my point is chill and stay opened minded until proved or not. There is no point in saying its new cos its probably isn't,  and have been tried before

Hi Gwhy
I agree there are alot of ideas I have had and in theory work with most of it working practicly but the systems are not closed so until it can be closed or proved that what I claim works I don't release it, if I claim a gate, I show a gate but I don't claim OU just a gate.
From years of research I have find there are alot of arays that work to a point but I have yet to see any that can close the loop be PM and do usefull work, the first proof of a PM concept is closing the loop, then continues spin, then OU so it can do work, Archer has done none of that with any device and until he even passes the first step closing the loop he can't claim anything.
If I see even the first step of closing the loop then I may look further and follow what his doing but never before that and I would never give money to work a principle that is not even proven past the first step.
With out the first step of closing the loop its just another theory.
Take Care Gwhy
Graham