Roll on the 20th June

[Morgenster]

remember i myself withheld this once, and i have to live with that, but i can do something to rectify that mistake. you cannot, and likely will not even cease, i know rusty won't, rusty is only interested in fame, having his name on something he invented like a trigate working array or someone else ideas he doesnt care, even with his name and picture in the paper he will still stand by his claim he is not mentally balanced, his photos could be of a chicken and an egg they are that far from the device, but will never relent that, but i imagine his real life mirrors this one.

You on the other hand are quiet and do what you are told at work, so this will at least have an impact equal to what you deserve. Newt the would be if he could be, this will simply put the nail in the coffin as most of his aquaintences think of him that way already.

People like our resident reporters who write blogs will simply loose any credibility they thought they had, but hey you could change your name i guess.

There's a storm coming and it look like the worst kind... magnetic

Dude, what are you doing here? Where's your fucking working wheel?
You don't think debating here's gonna get it done faster do you?
Besides, what happened to gravity? Is it now purely magnetic?

[ThothTheSecond]

@Mondrasek

Couldn't find it, and no one posted a link that worked for me...

The link is :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl

titled "Gravity Motor Patent"

looks quite interesting, and he has started his own thread for discussion "Gravity Motor Patent 7/10/08"

[ramset]

MORG  holy crap??

[exxcomm0n]

@ PureP

You still don't get it.

You don't understand that the "I found your questions to be too ridiculous to even merit thought of more than "you riding a unicorn while shitting pure gold to feed the stores of the leprechaun" (paraphrasing on purpose) appraisal of ALL THOSE QUESTIONS to be like pissing in my eye, and then saying you don't see why I socked you in the balls for it because you did ask if you were too close.

(The above highlighting done to stir the same feeling in you, that your comments mean to me anymore.)

Stop now, you're wasting your time.

P.S. You're not there yet, and the possibility of you getting there looks slim.

P.P.S. Ya notice how Newtonian Fraud and Rusty just jumped up and and nearly panted at your offer for collusion you made twice?
You'd think with some of the things said by one or the other that this would be the coolest (and most productive towards a working device that satisfies of the needs of all to stay within Newtons confines) thing since sliced bread.

@ shak

Thanks for the help in this, but he proved he can't see acquired knowledge as banked energy either man. (Ya know, the novice comment.)

<Sigh> I wish college didn't take all that time and expense, and maybe I would have used those partial scholarships to get me some banked energy.

Maybe that's why I dropped out of high school as it hadn't taught me anything in years and I couldn't see the point of staying if the gate to "higher learning" (which I get a more jaundiced and dismissive view of daily) was closed.

About the idea/graphics......Yours w/ Coreldraw are beating the cold, dead,  lifeless crap out of mine.
As to the same thing, I can see where you might say that.

Let's keep "popping up ideas from home plate" and see if any "make it over the fence".



@ OU-812

I love Rube Goldberg, did you know he won a Pulitzer prize in 1948 for those?

It's only fitting that the machine be seen as a Rube Goldberg (Heath Robinson for you UK folk) type device, as most of the arguments against it are of the same ilk, but that's where the comparison stops.
Rube machines were usually "one offs", which means that they have to be rebuilt to achieve the same motion they did once, again.
Everyone here wants (I think last count was) +1 revolutions, which I'd say about every skeptical argument posted here has done that 100 fold by now.

Keep trying though! Everyone needs a smile, even if it's born of envy and spite.

My, I just noticed how nicely that dovetails into the concept I'm arguing with PureP.

@ Rusty

All this invective here has even run down your resolve to be amiable in your posts (and you HAVE had good reason I suppose). It's sad, but understandable in a way.

But it might be more constructive to just post a library of your vids and drawings (if possible, I know it's easier said than done) to keep your claims from being challenged and lay the argument over ownership of concept to bed.
If it's there, and has been there for a long time, you can just post a link to each rediscovered  and misappropriated magnet experiment.

Just a suggestion, and all easier said, than done...........but I can see it now.

"Grahams Museum of Previously Explored Magnetic Experiments"
(I bet it could give the Museum of Unworkable Devices a run for it's money in web hits these days.)

As I say most times to just about everyone, keep coming back. Cause I believe out of everyone posting, you lasted the longest before resorting to expletives, and that has been no small task!

I congratulate you, but am sorry your run had to end.

Take care Rusty/Graham

@ all

Think it's time I took another sabbatical?

Last time, it got real nice and quiet except for the inevitable mutual dick sucking of some skeptical posters and the brave act of a few posting the latest newly born and defenseless idea to be savaged or ignored.

The whole "banked energy" concept may be much more philosophical than scientific, but _I_ (and a few other misguided souls) see it as necessarily for anything to get done.

Let's call it the excomm0n effect (Thanks Rast! It's catchy!) and use it as an Occam's Razor of common sense.

Fuck it.
I just used my own "razor" and it "cut" me.
That's what it was built for I guess.

I'm on walkabout from this thread.
This ain't the only way I can talk to most people involved with this, only the most narcissistically pleasing one. 

Can you kids be that honest about some of your motivations?
Ain't saying it's the only reason people are here, but everyone likes to be associated with greatness (the realization of a new device), even if it's only tenuously.


EDIT
(I was catching up to where I finally posted and found a good many of my points already made for me.)


@ mscoffman

<snip>
I would like to set a virtual breakpoint here and say if Archer
can't build an operating wheel with what he has shown then he needs to be given Overunity.com Chief MIB Status. This time,
he needs to keep all moving conductive lentz metal excepting the runners out of the array magnetic field. I also suggest spraying
any operating magnetic overunity machine with (3M) antistatic spray to suppress the generation of pesky radiant...er a static
electricity.

I have a step by step method write up but I will let Archer do it since it *is* his show.

Bullshit boy.
It hasn't kept the rest of us from doing it.

Start a new thread and see if it gets as many hits as jratcliffs belittling ones about Archer have.

If you're too good for that, then you should be too good to even post here.
You've proven to me that you think you're too good to answer questions.
(Gee, that seems to be a popular theme here lately.)

@Tinsel;

This is an circular aluminum track with small circular magnet stacks fastened by clamp clips to the outside.
Aluminum is nonferrous, and transparent to a static magnetic field. It only is a lentz law breaking poison
if it moves relative to the magnetic field array which the ramp surface doesn't. The magnetic stacks are what
holds the runner not steel, which would magnetize with use.

Not completely transparent. It all depends on thickness champ.
I still drop a magnet down a thick copper pipe every once in a while to remind myself that everything is not absolute and even though an effect might not look like it's not there, it might not be strong enough for you to see.

@RustySprings;

Don't be too down on Archer. I thought he gave a great Trigate demo in tape #2 even though he panned the setup
and I am considering building an interesting large scale demo using trigate arrays.

Cool dude, you can build.

Why don't you do some of that?

@ Morg

I have seen just about every post from you add up to the petulant whine of a child saying "but I wanted a PINK pony!" and have served about the same end.

=======================================================

Now I lurk back to the shadows of walkabout, but I couldn't resist the latest appending as I had finally caught up on my "soapz".
[/color]

[jratcliff]

Maybe AQ is right.  All you monkeys just don't get it.  He has not gone on tangents after not being successful, he is just building the next 'part' in the master plan.

One by one he is showing us the pieces to save humanity and all everyone does it bicker.  but ah ha!  I've solved it and here it is:

The roller goes around the track, drops onto one end of the fulcrum, it lowers and the load drops back to the track and goes around again

The consequence of the fulcrum lowering causes a repulsive mag array on the other side to move closer to the gravity wheel, pushing the rod to the other side.  Because the mag array starts away from the wheel until the fulcrum pushes it closer, there is no 'wall'. 

The wheel spins and we have OU/FE!!!


(He should have called it the Sword of Rube Golberg)

Dude, that's hysterical!!