Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

You (and Rasta) clearly missed the point of my post.

I understand the magnets may die quickly, thats why I won't object to archers "working wheel" when they do.

If they die after five cycles I'll still call it OU, he was able to extract the energy while they lasted.

Seriously, dont be so prejudice with everything I say...

I couldn't help myself. This is too priceless.
I do this "publicly" because you wouldn't read a PM (not that you read my posts anyway, they might threaten to disrupt your pure physics paradigm).

K then, why shouldn't he when you continue to do it while wagging a finger at everyone else saying "YOU CAN'T DO THAT".

You foppish pure physics oozing EDIT kunt (I found a word filter! Woohoo!). You took lessons from the gov't, didn't you?

@Exx

Your silly little antics have no effect on me.

And what do you mean I'm not quite there? You're so baked off your ass and stuck in "ramp battery land" you dont when know what there is, let alone where it is or how to get there.

Machines add variables to energy systems that have an effect on the systems total energy requirements to do a job. There are components of the total system energy the machines can never change, such as potential energy. While quality of construction increases servicability and decreases some losses, this is not to say the machine stores the construction energy.

DEAL WITH IT.

You are dismissed...

Let's talk convenience now.
You dismiss me? We can only hope as it will lessen the amount you "contribute" as over the past 10 pages so much could have been avoided if you had done it previously.

You seem to think your opinion means much to me, and that is incredibly funny in and of itself.
I pitied you way back and offered you a way out.

JUST DON'T POST IN REPLY TO ME!

But you are too good for that though.
It would seem to me that you consider this thread more of a vital concern than your studies or work.
At least you seem to put more energy into it.

I can put in as much as I like since I'm self employed.

And as to computer "shenanigans", I suppose you use a drafting table (you do draft, don't you? Being an engineer and all) instead of CAD.
Too bad there's no banked energy there in computer shenanigans as I'm sure it doesn't provide any ease.

Let's see JUST ONE drafted project of yours. Since I remember back to the days when "blueprints" were that way because it was the only way to copy drafted documents and have seen a couple, I'd like to see your contribution to the craft.

If you can't do that, draw me up a draft of a salt shaker, or the bug that is continually trying to defend the stream of shit it causes to erupt from your ass in a smaller and smaller time span.

Spin monkey boy, spin.



@ all

Sorry, but life doesn't offer you comedic material like this often and you gotta strike while the iron is hot!

[TinselKoala]

At last! Somebody mentioned Archer!!

[tekylife]

I built enough to convince myself that it will work.  But I wanted to get it to those who have the tools to model and create a usefull prototype as fast as posible because of the humanitarian implications (water pump, etc.).  Someone with modeling software that handles magnets and kinimatics can do this quickly.

I have built the simple and improved mass switches and arranged four on a wheel.  They work great and are very simple.  They just take me a long time to make in my garage and living room using rolled up paper tubes, a jig saw, and superglue.

I have neither the tools nor instruments to make a working protptype quickly at home.  That is why I payed for and rushed through the patent app (in 3 days) so I could get it out there.  Please pass it along to anyone you know who is "skilled in the arts".

Thanks,

M.

Hi M.

I took a look at the figures (maybe you should make the .doc a pdf too ) . Everything looks good. Care to video the thing spinning several cycles ? I mean ... by now you should know what we expect as a beginning of a proof - if you read the thread.
The unbalanced wheel concept is similar to the SOG . Your implementation is way simpler. kudos
Show us your 4 arms prototype! Maybe this could convince Newtonian God to build it

[therealrasta]

@ all

Sorry, but life doesn't offer you comedic material like this often and you gotta strike while the iron is hot!

lol... Well this has been quite funny.. .

I wonder how the project is coming along from Archers side.. I suppose we will hear more later on this evening or this weekend.. Looking forward to you build.

[purepower]

I was hoping to avoid my PC this weekend but I promised mondrasek I'd look at his patent.
Now I'm glad I've read it. What a momentus occassion. Good thing I'm about to crack another beer to celebrate.


You're right Chet. I often feel I am too harsh on him when I consider my own attitude as a youngster. Unfortunately I have to relate my 16 year old self to PP. But I'm sure he'll grow up some day and may start acting a bit more like P-Motion. I actually preferred PP when I thought he was P-Motion too.


@PP

As per above, I can relate to your cockyness. I've been there too, a long time ago in a galaxy far, far... ahhh... below the equator.

The fact that you didn't post a scathing review of my last post to you must mean you may have actually learnt something from it or at least taken something away from it. Trust me, you will learn at least one new thing each day, and occasionally it will not be what you expect and will come from those who you expect the least.


shakman

Ya, I know I can be cocky, and sometimes a flat out arrogant prick. This is especially true when I feel I am being attacked. But it comes out sometimes even when I am playing nice.

I am confident in my understanding of physics, mechanics, and mathematics. Sometimes too confident.

I'll try harder to keep it under control. We had a pretty good discussion, we remained civil.

Just remember, if you want to puck a fight with the kid, he's gonna fight back. I will do my best not to instigate a feud, but opposition to some topics is to be expected. I will just present my case as professional as possible.

In regards to our previous discussion, we pretty much share common ground. We both understand there are some components of an energy system that can not be changed, and some that can be improved upon with machines. I just have one question that I would like answered:

In the pulley example, we bank energy with its construction. However, the addition of the pulley also introduced friction, making the job harder. Now, if machines bank energy to facillitate the user, how can this be? By your thesis, the use of a machine must always make the job easier.

-PurePower