Roll on the 20th June

[spinner]

To Spinner,

I am not naming names on who is attacking Archer,  This isnt kindergarten and I realize Archer has done some attacking as well.  So this then goes to Archer, stop attacking people too.  I dont know who started it and I dont care.

I can understand why he sometimes flies off the handle.  If you were getting ganged up upon, wouldnt you lash out?  After all it is his original intention to share his ideas with us and try to get a wheel to work.  Yes he has gone off tangents, but maybe it is to better the wheel.  I dont know what he is thinking, I only see the end results. I too want to see a working wheel so I may build and stop forking over big money to utility companies for hardly any return.

If you believe that you are in the group and are being defensive upon what I said, then thats on you and are welcome to your opinion.  All I was asking was for everyone to settle down and make peace.  How many pages of this thread has been about people attacking someone else and trying to get the last word in?  Can we not work together to get this wheel working?  Dont you think people are more productive in a positve enviornment instead of a negative one?

Mark

Hi, Mark!

Fair post. I was about to answer a kitefreak's post (another intelligent poster, it seems...Even though it seems I was the target of his critics)...

I have no problem with "settle down and make peace".  I hate attacks of any kind. So if this is of any help to a general cause, I can easily go away, if my view about "AQ's FE" is disturbing..

You see, I've been in this "FE" for a long time... I've seen generations of people, with different abilities, on many forums, coming and going...  Maybe Stefan can say something about statistics of members on this site? Active membership (average), like 2-3 months? How many of you are physicists, engineers, (electrotechnics, chemistry, ...).

Hey, it's not about a formal education. For me, a common sense and a good grasp for things is the main factor... For instance, Rusty Springs is a member whoose opinion I respect.... Or PurePower's youth/intelligence... Although I have a minor dispute in the past with him, he (mostly, lol) knows what he's talking about...

I've seen many Archer like claims before. NOT A SINGLE ONE CAME INTO FRUITION. Not on this site, on previous sites, similar sites, 1year, 5 year, 50year, 200 year etc ago...

Archer came on the scene with a "big bang", shitting and pissing all over the place. He had nothing of value except a delusional fantasy.. 
He promissed a "Sword of God", a perpetual motion machine, based on gravity/magnetism... At the start, we have to deal with the fallacies like "Thermal Accelerator", "OU lever", "Ethernal Syphon", etc, etc... Just before the original deadline (June, 20th.), he switched from the "Sword of God" (grav/mag wheel) to an "Egyptian fulcrum" (an 'overunity' lever thingy). Man, that was something... If you didn't recognised his delusions then, there's no hope for you...

After the 20th, he change the tune (again)... This time, he wents to a "permanent magnet motors" waters... The rest of it you know...

Yes, he may not be a fraudster and a scammer (not intensionally).. I appologise!. But - He's DELUSIONAL, and a LIAR, and....

Ah, never mind. You'll see for yourself...

[Rusty_Springs]

that'll do it. you can see the machine running next week. But everything else can now wait.

better go and annoy all the train shunt sites all over the world that will be using these gate keys by tomorrow, in fact they will likely have plans out before you see these ones.

Vid only. watch the gate key vid now, a pin touch from a foot away to create a super mag out of a piece of isotropic ferrite that can be turned on and off, but hey there is no loop there is no key there is no wheel its all just a fairy tale. well it fucking is now. give my regards to besslers crew.

I saw the vid, yet again a old idea most call it magnetic current some use iron wire to do this and yes the bolt must be touching the magnets current carring metal for it to be a magnet.
Neos close to weaker magnets will lift them but because you a weaking the magnetic flux by having it run through the metel to the neo it will not reach out as much and it has to touch the weaker magnet to join the flux between the Neo and weaker magnet, also its not a supermagnet in fact its alot weaker then the neos you was using.

[exxcomm0n]

Hey Ex,

Dirt Devil, I like it, LOL.

In my experiances, usually it is the simple solutions that end up being the best, which is why I like this design.
Good work with the newest mod,  what do you think of just having the roller pass through a coil on the ramp.  No moving parts, only induced current drag.
Also we could use Archers new gate key, activated by the roller on a mechanical arm to eliminate the wall on exit.

Anyways, I closing up the shop for the weekend, it's time to release more of that "banked" energy in a bunch of cold beer

ciao,   Dirt 

Hey Dirt,

Damn if you didn't give it yet another angle to be explored. I was thinking it before, but lost it when doing that tangent thingy I do so well.
Thanks for helping dredge it up!

Is there some way the track strip starts being generator? There is still a lot of flux happening in the MkE/roller interaction and maybe even use the "current" driven by the mags as an additional wall defeating measure on its way to storage.
Or the coil occupying the area needed for ramp/switch and gap and providing both.

I have no idea if something like these is even possible, but it never will be until I say it (ain't that just the height of narcissism? ).

I mean until more than one person gives it a thought, it never will be possible (all right, sometimes 1 person CAN, but it ain't me. I ain't that strong or schmart).
Anyone can say it, the important thing is it's said.

Been thinking about Archer's gate being overhead mounted and using the fields of both the track and roller to be activated as the magnetic switch and being turned off by its own effect of forward motion!
Isn't that what you would want?

EDIT
Does the touch of the neos to the isoferrite always result in the same polar alignment?
Queue, care to help us out with your experience?

The thing that I'm @ this very moment wondering more about with that idea is how many MkEs you have to effect with the switch.
Since bounce/repel effect is felt @ the last 3 MkEs, have the switch turn off the last 6 MkE's once the roller is 2 into those last 6?

This is why I like the proximity switch in the ramp better. If you look at it as a class 2 or 3 lever with a screw assembly to open/close it at the gap, it's your throttle, your brake, and your key switch all in one.
Depending on where the lever starts that is.

None of the above has even been tested or verified in any manner, and should all be considered ONLY opinion.
They're only ideas, and really not old enough to fend for themselves yet.

[X00013]

@ Exxcom,
                           If PurePower is not interested. Maybe I could help. A 3d cad file would be handy, or some 2D blueprints in any File format, I pretty much have them all, AutoCad, Solidworks..etc..etc.., or even a hand drawn picture on a piece of shit paper with dimensions ofcourse. If your prototype is uphill/downhill ( wavy ), Try forming it in clay, then fiberglass over it, or heat the plexi in the oven and lay it over the clay mold. Also, I enjoyed your vids.

@ Heiwa
                        I agree with you totally, except that I enjoy reading peoples rants, and you sound Hot.


@ Archer
                      Fuck em all, Keep building.

[shakman]

I saw the vid, yet again a old idea most call it magnetic current some use iron wire to do this and yes the bolt must be touching the magnets current carring metal for it to be a magnet.
Neos close to weaker magnets will lift them but because you a weaking the magnetic flux by having it run through the metel to the neo it will not reach out as much and it has to touch the weaker magnet to join the flux between the Neo and weaker magnet, also its not a supermagnet in fact its alot weaker then the neos you was using.

C'mon Graham. I asked people to lay off you but you take one foot out of your mouth to feed it with the other.

It's not the idea that's new, it's the implementation. It's not like Archer has manufactured a new material. He has created a new method to implement these qualities effectively. I thought even you would see that. If this implementation is not new then I want to know who's been keeping it a secret as the potential applications for a fast switching permanent magnet without any outside power input are phenomenal. If you've invented a similar switch already then you're a dickhead for keeping it under your hat so long.

BTW It's spelt "metal". Kind of important if you're working with magnets champ.

shakman