Roll on the 20th June

[purepower]

just an observation...

AQs new wheel has no gravity component, as indicated by him stating it runs on it's side.

It runs (apparently) by switching off the wall at the end with less energy than aquired through attraction.

Hmm, that's odd. That's exactly how I said it could potentially work about 6 weeks ago!

I'm not trying to claim the discovery for my own as I don't have the knowledge of magnetic materials required. I thought bismuthe might do the trick, but smokey shot it down. I just new from an energy perspective that this is what would be the key.

I hope AQ did it! I'm just a little upset he viewed me as an enemy rather than a constructive critic. He probably would have shaved a month off of this had he listened...

-PurePower

[gwhy!]

It would be easy for him to show it had no sticky spot by letting us see what really happens to the roller at the end of the track. It's a nice setup, but although it looks like he's catching the roller before it falls off, he's actually catching it before it rolls back. Just watch it in slow mo. Is this supposed to show something similar or better than Archer. I don't get it. (but keep up the good work)

I think it may be a improved version of Archers ( or very careful timing for removing the roller at the end of the track plus the track may not be level ), In Archers vids the sticky spot is way more obvious

[capthook]

So - been doing some more testing on the 'magnet switch' ( ok - Archurian Gate key if you will  )

He showed the following components:
1: activated magnet
2: bolt attached to activated magnet
3: wand (flat piece of steel) making contact with bolt at its corner/edge for the switch
4: magnets attached to wand

It seems the wand might be an unnessecary component?

I have done some grinding of bolts into various configurations so-as to move the magnets into contact with the bolt directly (like shaks pics of the pin but ground more like a crowbar end)- and eliminate the wand.  The idea being a small surface area between the bolt and mags will still transfer a decent charge.  A thin/long/notched edge.... Unsure as of yet of the results.

Thoughts/comments on the wand component?  It's mass/iron contributes to the effect?  Or not - so bag it? etc...

PS - the "charge" will transfer across a small airgap - the larger the less transfer.  So even full contact not required if the switch magnets are strong enough to give you enough "activation" - but the configuration of the bolt and/or wand end will still be important.

PPS - using 5/8" x 3 1/2" steel bolts

[purepower]

Only people that try this desperatly to prove their worth to a bunch of relative strangers really have nothing going for them in the real world.

-PurePower

Ding, ding, ding, After  pages of posts, self awareness sets in.

Not really. I don't give a shit what you clowns think of me. I'm just here because I think it's al interesting and have a few things to share. When they are disputed, I defend for my own enjoyment, not because I care what you or anybody thinks of me...

-PurePower

[futuristic]

It would be easy for him to show it had no sticky spot by letting us see what really happens to the roller at the end of the track. It's a nice setup, but although it looks like he's catching the roller before it falls off, he's actually catching it before it rolls back. Just watch it in slow mo. Is this supposed to show something similar or better than Archer. I don't get it. (but keep up the good work)

Have you guys seen the new set of videos from Batman? Because he clearly shows that roller can go off the track with no problem. Check out the video 5 again:
http://energybat.com/video/MAGENT%20VIDEO%20NO.%205.wmv