Roll on the 20th June

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi All
I have no idea why people think Archers video shows a working principle, like I said it only brakes the wall with the energy from his hand and it only rotates because of the energy from his hand pushing it but if you think thats impressive take a look at this and sm0ky2 has a video showing an experiment of a setup almost the same that spins for 5 mins if I remember right with a little push to start it.
What you will see looks great but there nothing special and are not PM yet there more impressive then Archers video.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/minatowheel/files/GeoMagRotaion.wmv
Take Care All
Graham

[The Eskimo Quinn]

JUst leaving and saw that thought i had better jump in and save the newbies from false remarks, dont need to look at mine, go to the dirt devil jump video and watch how fast it leaves you hand, the entrance at the start is attraction, you cannot push or move you hand as fast as the obect leaves it, ask anyone who has built one of the mayernik tracks, even to keep up with it your hand would noticable move a huge amount.

then back to the video, you see it almost stop then restart on the bottom twice with no hnad near it at all.

will no longer be dragged into remarks about this person, who has made many claims of proof and provided none. the minato wheel is neven shown from standing start as it cannot, and on top of that it is powered mecanically with a moving arm section, some by pulse motors. Nice try no cigar to the oil people today

[exxcomm0n]

@Archer
OK, Thanks for the reply.
I, for one, really appreciate all the effort you've put into this. Have a great vacation!

@All
I guess it's up to us folks, lets pick up where Archer has worked hard to put us. Lets try and finish this wheel.
(Not an empty statement by the way, I'll be ordering neos soon )

DING! Dingdingdingdingdingdingding!

Everybody packing up and going home?
Wondering where he got the funds to go on holiday?
Everyone issuing free passes?

Not particularly surprising then is it?
Pages of content crowing on how Newton should not (and hasn't been) maligned, that it "really doesn't run, people telling other people to "grow up", and not a god damned thing said about changing something to "make it better" or proving it will (not) work by trying replication until now.

Par for the course, eh?

Mags are expensive, I've dropped $200 this week on them by making the bold choice of "dope, or mags" and figgering my entertainment dollar was better used towards a gravity toy.

Ya see, I still like mind expanding toys whether they be herbaceous or educational .

It'll be sad if things quiet down as that still means that as far as most were concerned, it was not an experiment, but a side show that they complain didn't last long enough.

Wonder what the "noise level" will be now?

@ Archer

As I'm one of the lazy unlistening builders, I'll still try different things with the arced array as I see it an easy way to "break the wall" by shifting around it into another gate entrance.

You done some work bud and it is to be commended, but use the holiday to plan and stage your next vid if it comes, so that there isn't any detraction ability outside of the "He Photochopped it (the video)!" defense that is the only one I haven't seen displayed yet.

The bubbly is still chilling for the driven load vid.

@ all again

Who else is fool enough to set sail into the uncharted waters so charitably termed "an anomaly" wit (with) me?

[purepower]

I have been asking that question several times on this thread as to why people keep referring to Newton and CoE. I have no idea why Newton is maligned when he didn't even write the laws of thermodynamics.  He wrote the Laws of Motion and if people want to get bent out of shape over somebody they might as well pick Carnot. But in fact lots of scientists have contributed to developing, refining and proving these laws for many, many centuries.

My guess?

To pick on someone other than Newton, like Carnot or Kelvin, would require research into "the evil scientific paradigm" and, God forbid, open a textbook that has been poisoned by the oilmen!

Somebody please read Newtons laws and tell me what's wrong with them, and how they might somehow be an anti-FE conspiracy.

-PurePower

[purepower]

DING! Dingdingdingdingdingdingding!

Everybody packing up and going home?
Wondering where he got the funds to go on holiday?
Everyone issuing free passes?

Not particularly surprising then is it?
Pages of content crowing on how Newton should not (and hasn't been) maligned, that it "really doesn't run, people telling other people to "grow up", and not a god damned thing said about changing something to "make it better" or proving it will (not) work by trying replication until now.

Par for the course, eh?

Mags are expensive, I've dropped $200 this week on them by making the bold choice of "dope, or mags" and figgering my entertainment dollar was better used towards a gravity toy.

Ya see, I still like mind expanding toys whether they be herbaceous or educational .

It'll be sad if things quiet down as that still means that as far as most were concerned, it was not an experiment, but a side show that they complain didn't last long enough.

Wonder what the "noise level" will be now?

@ Archer

As I'm one of the lazy unlistening builders, I'll still try different things with the arced array as I see it an easy way to "break the wall" by shifting around it into another gate entrance.

You done some work bud and it is to be commended, but use the holiday to plan and stage your next vid if it comes, so that there isn't any detraction ability outside of the "He Photochopped it (the video)!" defense that is the only one I haven't seen displayed yet.

The bubbly is still chilling for the driven load vid.

@ all again

Who else is fool enough to set sail into the uncharted waters so charitably termed "an anomaly" wit (with) me?

Chill out homeskillet, the term "anomaly" wasn't meant to be "generous," nor belittling.

Scientific progresses is founded on anomalies. First, we have our current paradigm. Then a discovery is made that does not fit this paradigm, termed an "anomaly." scientists investigate further, uncover new properties/principals that explain this anomaly, and a new paradigm is set. I read some literature a while back on scientific progress and the author went into detail about this process using these terms (can't remember his name though, back in my smoking days).

If anything it really was a generous compliment, inferring AQ may well lead us to a new paradigm in non-conservative magnetism!

-PurePower