Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

@rusty


only one pole would be facing any other magnet making it in a sence a mono magnet, yes I would really like seeing that donut magnet,

yeah i copied the above before you delete it, oh and as for you PS. I showed the block of flat magnets as a roller on video long before anyone else, so it only shows they listen, and havenot have shown you as correct, also clearly you do not understand that the block mags on exx trax are axial the same as a cylinder, which is opposite to a flat mag.

@ http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6853184.html

The ring magnet is generally magnetized to include a plurality of magnetic poles, such that at least one pole thereof is larger than at least one other pole thereof.

@ http://www.amfmagnetics.com.au/products/ferrite_magnets/rings_large

Single side ring magnets

@ http://www.magnetsales.com/Neo/Neoring.htm#sinteredring

Note that B10N materials are isotropic and may be magnetized through any dimension.

@ http://www.kjmagnetics.com/products.asp?cat=16

RC4CDIA    is diametrically nmagnetised

RC4C-N52 the same magnet below is axially magnetised

There are rings with 2 north and 2 south on one side, I could go on all day, clearly all have now seen who knows almost nothing about rings magnets

Still waiting for the post link to where i made the quote about donut mags and did not include the polarity? Ahh the many claims yet no proof. Sad, old and rusty, nothing new here from rusty

[GeorgeRudd]

iWhat's wrong, don't you like the new me? clear concise, no ranting, and accurate with my records. Yes it was pointed out to me that a sword stright to the heart with precision is better than just slashing away.

The problem is that you have brought a sword to a gunfight.

[JohnGalt_USA]

Still waiting for the post link to where i made the quote about donut mags and did not include the polarity? Ahh the many claims yet no proof. Sad, old and rusty, nothing new here from rusty

ROFLO Ahh the many claims yet no proof.

Archer, you're priceless!

[g4macdad]

@rusty


only one pole would be facing any other magnet making it in a sence a mono magnet, yes I would really like seeing that donut magnet,

yeah i copied the above before you delete it, oh and as for you PS. I showed the block of flat magnets as a roller on video long before anyone else, so it only shows they listen, and havenot have shown you as correct, also clearly you do not understand that the block mags on exx trax are axial the same as a cylinder, which is opposite to a flat mag.

@ http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6853184.html



The ring magnet is generally magnetized to include a plurality of magnetic poles, such that at least one pole thereof is larger than at least one other pole thereof.

@ http://www.amfmagnetics.com.au/products/ferrite_magnets/rings_large

Single side ring magnets

@ http://www.magnetsales.com/Neo/Neoring.htm#sinteredring

Note that B10N materials are isotropic and may be magnetized through any dimension.

@ http://www.kjmagnetics.com/products.asp?cat=16

RC4CDIA    is diametrically nmagnetised

RC4C-N52 the same magnet below is axially magnetised

There are rings with 2 north and 2 south on one side, I could go on all day, clearly all have now seen who knows almost nothing about rings magnets

Still waiting for the post link to where i made the quote about donut mags and did not include the polarity? Ahh the many claims yet no proof. Sad, old and rusty, nothing new here from rusty

@AQ

Please stop wasting your time with these morons. They are pointless for even being here. Tell them to shut up and ignore.

@exx

Have you ever listened to Earthless? http://www.last.fm/music/Earthless

One of my new favorites

How about Fu Manchu? I recommend, http://www.last.fm/music/Fu+Manchu/In+Search+Of... by them. Also, Nebula aint too bad either.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

Yes i read the site and left the remark in question still there, as most have seen the myth video since and know that i did state i had found a ring magnet of your description, showed the poles to be as you described and the proceeded to show the flaws in it with the flat mags having the poles facing up instead of out as in a Mayernik array which has all poles parrallel. I have made note of the video and the polarity change to match your later statements that the donut magnet you used was axial, and updated the site accordingly, as nothing was incorrect, nothing needed to be removed or altered. Most people follow the chain of events, you clearly missed the myth video that followed or were possibly too upset to listen to the comentary.

My goal is not to be the winner of who invented it, my goal is to prevent people from wasting time and money on an array that has right angle fields using flat magnets, which in history have never worked. Had you shown you had used a parrallel field system, there could be no doubt that it was you who had discovered it and that your input has great value. But not only does it not show that, you insist outside what is being replicated that your design will perfrom the same, I have no doubts that other designs in the future will performm the same with different magnetic alignments of poles. Perhaps even your own. But to date, you nor anyone else has shown any type of roller traverse the loop over magnetic fields that run at right angles to the roller. So we shall leave it at that. Yours may work, but as yet has not shown this to be so. Yours track magnets have their poles at right angles to the poles of the roller, mine are parallel so we can safely say they are not the same.

I think that settles the argument altogether, and have noted the post number to simply requote it again, should the need arise. 

I have exceptionall high speed skills in learning and adapting, i would say that when i came here you had more knowledge of magnetic than myself, but i have one luxury most people do not, nothing in my mind is fixed as absolute. You are stuck in absolutes, hence the reason you cannot leave the trigae even after seeing the videos of upsizing.

I truely believed them as key, tested and proved my own belief wrong and moved on. I would like someone (there seems to be many) who has a huge magnet stockpile to contact rusty with a view to taking his ideal plans for the correct setup of larger gates and test them for him, well, for us all. My tests may have missed something. but there seems to be endless words over them and little oir no videos. For something seen as a key by so many, i find this unusual, and not helpful. I have conducted and filmed tests as you have seen. Mine shown an absolute failure other than what the smaller ones can do, but on a lessor scale. Prove the theory or move on. Two gates are better than one.