Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

0u812
No other magnetic type has the power to breach gravity other then the rare earth magnets, you have to beat gravity first, and no other magnet has the field power to do it, of course you know that and are just playing with us to keep your secret supplier to yourself, afterall you wouldn't have made the whole thing up?! And now your saying you designed a taper to alleveiate the wall as well. Surely I am leaving this in the hands of the very best. I look forward to the video of a loop without neos, or with copper tapers soon. A mere triffle for someone such as yourself who invented this, in fact if it has no merrit your display would show how and why. Good luck

As for freddy sorry mate I think exx can best tell you, to make the climb the mags have to be closer together, when they are closer together it makes a strong wall, batman has almost no wall to get out of, If you don't belive me, ask him to do a one shot film of it leaving the track, then raise it just six inches at the end, it will not even make it to the end if it can already get off. you have seen the wall broken in the loop, you have seen the wall broken by me on a flattrack going over the hill (seems everyone forgot that film) there are no other videos of anyone else breaking a climbing wall, or a wall created by the huge fields made when you add enough power to make the object climb. In fact there are no others even to this day. Much less in history

you have two videos, one flat track with a hill and one is a loop, each uses different size mags and weights to show different effects, each time the wall is broken it is high power and heavy weight. or "GRAVITY"

ask ex to add a weight to the roller and see if it will climb the track, it wont as the mags are too far apart, when he brings them together the wall will increase, hence the reason you need to bleed the mags out at the end.

I do explain all of these things in the videos, but no one takes any notice. You need to go back and start watching them again the hill climb and the two loop videos, and you will see the change in weight and strength. When it finally gets over the top the momentum is weight times gravity and is already in motion.

if you want to build a batman track start at one inch apart for the first three then add a one quarter inch spacing as you go from there. now start at the very outside of the field, and the slingshot effect coming into the first three with weight and power will take it well past them dowen and out of the track on a flat surface. It is just a common SMOT effect when done like that, but has no climbing power.

If you cannot break the wall, you cannot build this machine. i Have found 3 ways to do it, you may find many more. Do not get sidetracked into what appears to be good video but is in fact not very impressive for a wall climber, yet still good to see someone has at least got a flat track wall broken regardless of how weak it may be, it is still a first outside myself to show the Mayernik broken.

for those trying now to get the track rods close together, now you see how hard just one demonstration piece is to build, much less lots of them.

[exxcomm0n]

Yea gods and lil' fishes!

I post stuff, nobody cares.

I don't post stuff, and all of the sudden I'm pretty poopular. (Yeah, I know it's mispelt).

Maybe I shouldn't even post, but that's no fun.

New mags should have arrived at one of the various locales I inhabit (not that I own, I depend on the kindness of strangers and charitable institutions ).

But anyway, new experiments are in the planning and we'll see what the wild and errant mind of me can brew up.

I look forward to the gatekey, but I'm not waiting for it.

If there's one way, there has to be more, ain't that so?

If'n man conquered the air, and then reached for the stars and took stumbling steps towards the nearest other spinning rocks, don't it seem that there is other things that haven't been had yet?

Life is here to show us how much we haven't experienced yet, or else I'd stop rolling outta bed.

But the thing that never ceases to amaze me recently is how many "have done it before" lately.

I think an experiment showing defiance of gravity without standard methods of powering (oil, gas, electricity, nuclear, avionics, rocket propulsion, etc.) would be a pretty big deal, but then I haven't seen the things that "them that's done before" have that are so much greater than that.

Mind trotting them out for a gander kids?

I might not always agree with someone, but being such a deluded "follower", I hardly see why I, or my videos should have any recognition in your eyes.

Good christ people! If'n my my content of the last 90-some pages ain't seen as being something other than a follower, there is no hope for ya.

I bet you believe that the only steel structure building in history to collapse due to metal fatigue from fire can cause one of the tallest buildings (well, 2 actually) on the earth to fall into it's own footprint as well.

.......and that a falling chunk of it could completely flatten another building near it (just happening to have all the SEC evidence in it).

.....and that such a travesty could be construed to spark a war against a country that had nothing to do w/ the so called "terrorists".

....and that it'll get any better after the next election.

And _I'M_ supposed to be a deluded sheep!

I'd rather be deluded about a perpetually turning wheel rather than that the leaders of my country have my best interests in mind.

So naysayers keep on a preachin'!

I need the entertainment to keep from going mental and doing something about my lack of delusion.

Well....that and playing w/ magnets, or HHO, or Bedini's school girl circuit.....

...and getting stoned........

....and knowing I do have friends in other countries that would probably host me for a while should I help someone coming up with an undiscovered (or un-utilized) energy source......

Can't think of any better way to destabilize a corrupt oligarchy than to give it's "citizens" a way to power their homes without a company(s) and government being involved continuously.



P.S. There's more than 1 way to skin a cat! (American colloquialism)

[Fred Flintstone]

@Archer - I can easily replicate your loop. I did within a few days of your video. The problem is...if you extend the track down so that it can pick up the weight at 7 or 8 o'clock, then it won't break the wall. So, breaking the wall is easy but closing the loop is not. What good is breaking the wall if it does not accomplish anything? I'm just asking...so don't get mad.

@BATMAN - show us what happens if you do not "catch" the magnet when it is going out of the array. If it continues on with no loss in speed then you are on to something big.

Freddy

[The Eskimo Quinn]

To Purepower

As I said a few pages earlier, speed does not equal torque, and you have found the original statement, So if a childs whirly windmill on a stick is doing 100 rpm, in your mind that must "equal" huge torque,

yet an industrial cold saw that only turns at 40rpm must he less torque, so we should use your math to have a childs windmill toy on a stick cut I beams for commercial buildings.

Well i have to stand by what i said, RPM and speed do not "equal" (nor are even a slight indication for math purposes) torque.

And if you were to show the entire thread from the site page you would note i was reffering to the fact you had quoted the math for torque for tension not torque as it applies to movement as you have left out speed  or distance over time as part of you math.

So again yes i stand by that also, that torque when relation to a moving object (and you were talking about the rod transition from side to side) requires speed as part of the calculation or time over distance.

The two hardly contradict each other, the fist say chidrens windmills at high RPM or anything at high rpm does not constitue torque, Don't think I'll get an argumant there.

and the second says that when calculating the math for torque for a moving object, one must have time over distance as part of the math "which you did not" again, don't think i'll get an argument there.

This is the first post i can honestly say without doubt, you are not an engineer nor even a trainee out of university. I am not being nasty, but every engineer who just read your comments and mine would agree.

If that still makes me a liar, then so be it, (but can i have one of those childrens fans that cut steel )

Have a nice day

[Fred Flintstone]

@exxcomm0n 

Do you really think the twin towers were not destroyed by the planes? Seriously? Ok, I dont want to start anything here, but these conspiracy theories are ludicrous.

Freddy