Roll on the 20th June

[JohnGalt_USA]

Time and again people on this thread ask what's the harm in people trying to replicate Archer's wheel?

"Okay, it's a waste of time but who is it hurting?"

Many would rather just forgive and forget Archer's claim that he built and destroyed a working prototype two years ago to prevent Arabs from losing their jobs.

"Hey let's just forgetaboutit and give Archer credit for what he's trying to do right now!"

No, let's not!

Here is an example of what bright people can do when they focus their efforts within the realms of science, not Archurian bullshit!

New Kind of Electrolysis to Catalyze Hydrogen Economy
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1953/

Imagine if these students had instead wasted their time trying to replicate Archer's wheel. What a waste of talent that would have been.


Archer please tell us about the device that you destroyed. I am referring to the working perpetual motion machine that you destroyed 2 years ago. This claim is what brought most of us here. I think that it is about time that you gave us some answers.

How did it work?

How long did it run under it's own power?

How much power did it put out?

Archer I am going to keep posting the same questions over and over again until you answer them!

--
John Galt
Inventor, Engineer, Skeptic
"There is a big difference between thinking outside of the box and thinking outside of the Cracker Jack box!"

[exxcomm0n]

Time and again people on this thread ask what's the harm in people trying to replicate Archer's wheel?

Good to know you're up on things, and I heartily echo this sentiment as well.

"Okay, it's a waste of time but who is it hurting?"

That I will disagree with as viewing any learning experience as a waste of time is a bad thing.

Many would rather just forgive and forget Archer's claim that he built and destroyed a working prototype two years ago to prevent Arabs from losing their jobs.

"Hey let's just forgetaboutit and give Archer credit for what he's trying to do right now!"

No, let's not!

Here is an example of what bright people can do when they focus their efforts within the realms of science, not Archurian bullshit!

New Kind of Electrolysis to Catalyze Hydrogen Economy
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1953/

This is a good approach, and appeals to vanity, but you can't have it both ways.

If we're bright people, we might have insight into something that others don't.

If we're stupid for considering this concept to be worth exploring, then what contribution could we possibly have to any other "scientific" process?

This mean I should go experiment with a TPU now?

I'd be fried inside of 2 weeks cause I'm pretty sure of my schematic stupidity.

I can follow a schematic until it hits a tube, triode, or IC but after that I'm hopelessly lost as I'm not an EE.

Thing is, I can follow a map too, but it doesn't me a cartographer.

See the parallel with your point?

Imagine if these students had instead wasted their time trying to replicate Archer's wheel. What a waste of talent that would have been.

Yes I can see that, but do you know WHY???

They MIGHT have the intuitive thinking of "the little girl that said to let the air out of the tires", but not be able to bring much else to the table.

If they could, it would have to come from their education (whether formal or occidental) and experience.
Both of those are tantamount (or should be) to their INTEREST.

If they are interested, they do things to to enhance that education and experience.

That's were this really resides as no one (to my knowledge) is getting paid to do this.

In fact, I've seen evidence of many posters to this thread having their fingers in a great many pies here, except for the skeptical posters.
They (as a rule, but not always) have the most horrid posting histories, and usually limited to one thread.

<snip>
Inventor, Engineer, Skeptic
"There is a big difference between thinking outside of the box and thinking outside of the Cracker Jack box!"

Keep trying for that tag line.

Might I suggest "There is a big difference between thinking outside of the box and sniffing the glue used to make it!"

.....as it just seems a better brand of disdain and alludes to addled cognitive ability.

I do take on freelance writing gigs from time to time.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

all those people and just one design? how unimpressive
http://surphzup.com/gpage.html

[johnagain]

Good on you Archer

Since the start of this thread interest in free energy has skyrocketed

many successfull wheels and devices have  been completed

and there are many more working or nearly working devices

even my own seven year old device has received a miraculous revitalisation

and most of this and these devices is contributable in part to your enthusiasm and inventiveness

Thanks again Archer

To all out there
Archers only intent is clearly to share freely and impart of his knowledge,
gained through hardwork and the school of hard knocks.

With only good intent to all even those that are useing him

Rats in a lab are treated better than many have treated Archer

When all is said and done Archer is a great man that has done the best he can under the conditions he has been in
   
Whatever happens from here only good can come from a fine human being like Archer Quinn

John  Stiller

[Morgenster]

Wow, now I feel bad.

As the story progresses, aq slips further and further away from reality. He is slowly losing his fan base. He is down and out.

All he had to do was show one of many ou devices he created. Many say it was due to the lack of money. If that's true, why couldn't he use materials from the one he took apart years ago, or rebuild the one that was "running roughly" recently?

He had plenty of time, money, and materials to fulfill his promise. Instead, we are left with more promises.

Now he is claiming promises to God?

I've refrained from saying this because I know it won't be taken well. I had a family-friend, who is a psyc at a mental hospital, read through aqs posts and webpage. As this was a month ago, I can't remember the title of the illness he said aq suffers from, but I remember the symptoms.

A month ago, aq fit the profile well: disdain for structure and existing authority, erratic behavior, lack of focus and commitment, poor problem solving skills, and a very high level of self-importance.

Now that he is claiming to have personal communications and obligations to a higher being, there is no doubt in my mind aq suffers from this disease (name to be posted when I speak to him again).

Take it and do what you want with it, I don't care how you all live your lives.

Just thought you should know...

-PurePower

I figure schizophrenia. But it could also be borderline personality disorder.