Roll on the 20th June

[g4macdad]

No, the question that started your hissy fit was on Archer's original device not the SOG so it is not rhetorical at all. I quote: "Please tell us about the device that you destroyed. I am referring to the working perpetual motion machine that you destroyed 2 years ago. This is what brought most of us here. "

I think George Bush is full of shit too but that doesn't stop me from holding him accountable or anyone else that spouts nonsense or lies.  And I am not here everyday but if you want to lump me together with other critical thinkers be my guest.

The problem is, you have no point. If you think OU/FE is impossible then your question is rhetorical and pointless. What you lack is sincerity and curiosity. You have already stated that you believe OU is impossible. So your motives for being here will always be obvious, pointless and sad. What you do not lack is, cynicism and a false sense of purpose, which stems from your arrogance and pride. You could learn tons from Exx and others here. But you really cannot learn anything, so please leave us alone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo

[yoyo]

If I remember correctly Archer made no claims his toy was over unity. It was run by electro magnets if my memory serves correctly. And now he is attempting to build a working permanent magnet design with near the same basic principles.

Edit -- Making it red so you idiots can see it and stop asking over and over again.

rasta u should lay off the pipe man cause your brain is gettin fried

FE Truth: How many working prototypes currently exist?

Archer: The first one I destroyed (the 12 volt one) Toys do not impress me, nor do they impress the public looking for something that can be used straight away, not some fairy story of down the track. There are several sets of plans with friends, and some with people who don?t even know they have them, but this will be the only working one as of that date, and once you read and see the full build, you will note that any basic welder or mechanic or good handyman can reproduce the effect.

"I intend to cleanse this planet of this filth and end global warming all in one day and one single action." -Archer Quinn

Fe Truth: How do you start the device?

Archer: Simply turn the wheel by hand, crank or other machine (depending on size) as it is driving the generator which in turn powers a device that manipulates the wheel over gravity with a small percentage of that power.

Fe Truth: Once started, how long will it self-sustain?

Archer: It will run as long as the components hold out.


so he says it uses a small % of the power made at the generator to run it and it will run as long as the components hold out so he is saying ou
asking again what % of power to run it? what amount of power coming out? what are the specs of the electromagnets?
all fair questions but he cant answer cause he couldnt even make a electromagnet that pics up a paperclip

[g4macdad]

I hope I am not moving too far OT  but this is defiantly related to Big Oil and our true common foe.

Archer and all others, Meet the Antichrist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUbCquOUrL0 

[gwhy!]

If I remember correctly Archer made no claims his toy was over unity. It was run by electro magnets if my memory serves correctly. And now he is attempting to build a working permanent magnet design with near the same basic principles.


Edit -- Making it red so you idiots can see it and stop asking over and over again.

I'm with rasta on this one. Read the full interview he never claims that the toy was UO. 

[madsen]

The problem is, you have no point. If you think OU/FE is impossible then your question is rhetorical and pointless. What you lack is sincerity and curiosity. You have already stated that you believe OU is impossible. So your motives for being here will always be obvious, pointless and sad. What you do not lack is, cynicism and a false sense of purpose, which stems from your arrogance and pride. You could learn tons from Exx and others here. But you really cannot learn anything, so please leave us alone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w39FnpuMRfo

Pardon my jumping in here, g4macdad, but it seems to me that Bobbotov's opinions on the feasibility of OU/FE have no bearing on whether his question is "rhetorical and pointless" or not; whether he lacks "sincerity and curiosity" is also irrelevant.  You can't dismiss his question simply on the grounds that he is a skeptic.