Roll on the 20th June

[Godmode]

@Pay Attention!
Level 1: The SMOT is not for moving a mechanical load. It is merely to show the magnetic field movement.
Level 2: The Searle device is the true SMOT unit for the creation of vortex fields in a vortex. This is where the next energy level is created. But it still a mechanical model but utilizing the magnetic field in the correct way.
Level 3: The Deyo device creates fields in place at each coil. The space between is where the power comes from and the interaction of the resonancy. This is power available from a field generation mode.
See the similarities?

Now drop your spears and hammers and work to alleviate yourselves from ground based thinking.

If you humans continue to pride yourselves on the ground you own then the only ground you gain is based on the boundary you take from others.

Godmode. Give.

The wheel has already been invented.

[Bobbotov]

Can someone (preferably Mr. Quinn) please clarify if the original device mentioned in the Free Energy Truth interview was an overunity device or not? This is the only reason why I have come here! I know that it has been destroyed but can you please tell us more about what the device was capable of?

The way that I read Mr. Quinn's comments it seems like he is claiming that his toy was a working perpetual motion machine that could run continuously without an outside energy source until the parts wear out. Isn't this considered OU?

What I do not understand is that there seems to be a lot of confusion about the original device that was destroyed yet I can not find any comments from Mr. Quinn about the device in this entire thread. This does not make any sense. Wouldn't the working toy prototype be a significant breakthrough regardless of how little power it created?

There is no confusion. He said: "The first one I destroyed (the 12 volt one) Toys do not impress me, nor do they impress the public looking for something that can be used straight away, not some fairy story of down the track"

I think the "fairy story down the track" is prophetic in light of the last few months. He then added in the interview:

"My peace of mind is knowing it has already been built once, now it is simply a matter of size so as to remove any perception it is a toy."

So, he admits right there he has built this device before and it worked and now he was attempting to scale it up to something that was not a toy.

People have been weaseling over these words for post after post yet I do not see how any other conclusion could be reached. He did this before. He also said he made plans and distributed them:

"There are several sets of plans with friends, and some with people who don?t even know they have them" So in fact all he he had to do was follow his original plans. But whatever those were the fact is he has changed direction so many times as to obviate any usefulness those plans may have had if they ever existed or were relevant at all.

[Bobbotov]

Level 3: The Deyo device creates fields in place at each coil. The space between is where the power comes from and the interaction of the resonancy. This is power available from a field generation mode.

I hope you don't mean Stan Deyo do you? He is a complete fruitcake. Check out his website: http://www.standeyo.com/index1.html

[Absolute Power]

There is no confusion. He said: "The first one I destroyed (the 12 volt one) Toys do not impress me, nor do they impress the public looking for something that can be used straight away, not some fairy story of down the track"

I think the "fairy story down the track" is prophetic in light of the last few months. He then added in the interview:

"My peace of mind is knowing it has already been built once, now it is simply a matter of size so as to remove any perception it is a toy."

So, he admits right there he has built this device before and it worked and now he was attempting to scale it up to something that was not a toy.

People have been weaseling over these words for post after post yet I do not see how any other conclusion could be reached. He did this before. He also said he made plans and distributed them:

"There are several sets of plans with friends, and some with people who don?t even know they have them" So in fact all he he had to do was follow his original plans. But whatever those were the fact is he has changed direction so many times as to obviate any usefulness those plans may have had if they ever existed or were relevant at all.

Thanks Bobbotov for your reply and for clarifying a few things for me.

So why are so many people getting flamed here for asking questions about Archer's original device that he destroyed?

Since June 20th has come and gone without success it seems like Archer should return to what once worked. Perhaps if we could see how the original toy device worked some of us here could solve the problem that is preventing Archer from scaling it to a larger size.

[kude]

There is no confusion. He said: "The first one I destroyed (the 12 volt one) Toys do not impress me, nor do they impress the public looking for something that can be used straight away, not some fairy story of down the track"

I think the "fairy story down the track" is prophetic in light of the last few months. He then added in the interview:

"My peace of mind is knowing it has already been built once, now it is simply a matter of size so as to remove any perception it is a toy."

So, he admits right there he has built this device before and it worked and now he was attempting to scale it up to something that was not a toy.

People have been weaseling over these words for post after post yet I do not see how any other conclusion could be reached. He did this before. He also said he made plans and distributed them:

"There are several sets of plans with friends, and some with people who don?t even know they have them" So in fact all he he had to do was follow his original plans. But whatever those were the fact is he has changed direction so many times as to obviate any usefulness those plans may have had if they ever existed or were relevant at all.

Isn't this the latest design for the original concept? http://www.surphzup.com/gpage777.html

I beleive that it was conceded that it couldn't be made to work. It was abandoned for the Mayernick Array, which is currently under some replication and study.

I suppose, for the historical record, the original plan of the very original toy device should be made available, but to what use would a plan of a device that was abandoned serve, other than lending credibility to its existence.

The truth is self evident the new attempt of the original device could not be acheived, so one must move on.