Roll on the 20th June

[sky]

Madsen you're being a nitpicking prick. You didnt understand energy measurement and conversion systems, Archer explained it to you, now you know, get over it.

1kw constant for 1 hour is 1kwh  now stfu for gods sake

[protein_man]

Why the heck does nearly everybody here target Archer? The bloke has given his time to upload videos and communicate everything he is doing and all you can do is ridicule him. I believe Archer has/will have OU and will happily share it with the rest of us. I hope you all feel like shiit when he does present OU and that you choke on your words! I'm behind you 100% Archer have been reading since post 1 and it's pretty clear you have a great scientific mind! I cant wait to see your next vid.

All the best
protein_man

[kude]

You can use whatever unit of Energy you want. The Energy needed to push the weight up the left side of the wheel equals the Energy coming down the right side of the wheel according to the article on conservtive force in wikpedia. The moving arms don't get around this law. If a wheel can shown with the moving arms, and it works, then there is something concrete to show that the CoE can be gotten around.

You can put an electromagnet at the bottom left starting point and push the weight/magnet up and over the top.  The Bendini school girl model does that. I am not familiar with how a Bendini wheel generates electricity, but if the pulse electromagnet can be shut off, it then uses no Energy. Then keep the part that does generate Energy. Assuming you can get rid of the return Energy part of a magnet track, use the magnet  track  to move the left side of the wheel up and the top. I don't know if the circuit could be split, that is generator saved, toss out pulse part. Substitue the magnet track for the pulse part. That would be an overunity device if all the pieces worked as intended. And that is the trick, making it work.

[X00013]

Enuff already!!!!!!!!!!!!!    chucle

[Evil Roy Slade]

in fact even simpler for you, put on pound on a see saw that travels one foot, that fall is one footpound exactly you already know what that equals in kilowatts, now put one pound on the other side and it will lift it back the same distance. the second one pound is also the same in kilowatts rating so you know this to be true.

now i know that may seem complicated to you, so you should leave the subject alone

The foot pound unit you refer to in the see-saw case has absolutely nothing to do with how far the see saw travels. It's a Torque measurement. Placing a one pound weight one foot away from the see saw centre will create a Force of One Foot-Pound at that point.

So what would be the force if you placed a stool under the seesaw where the one pound weight was? In your world it would be zero because the seesaw didn't (couldn't) travel any distance.

ERS