Roll on the 20th June

[kremlin01]

     ? Reply #5979 on: Today at 10:13:52 PM ?
Hey JG you really have got some 'brass neck' you do go on some, notice some of the team are keeping a low profile.
How many times will you tell us we are wasting our time?

   'and still they watched, and still their wonder grew'

regards, Bren.

 

[gwhy!]

Or hadnt you noticed that there has not been a mass dumping of videos regarding the chain reaction of the mayernik as false, not even by rusty. I put my neame on the line.

Hi Archer,
     I have said many pages ago that I would build "YOUR TRACK" ( same track that I was playing with before I even heard of you ) if you give me the exact spacing \ configuration and size of your mags because you must have hit on something very special if you can get it to loop continually without any outside help. I have continued to have the odd little play with my track in between my own projects and the only remotely intresting thing that I have witnessed was the up/over and out as you call it, But I'm afraid I seen \ done this long before you showed it in your video. I have learnt enough and played enough with this track ( in the format that I have it configured which MUST be different from yours) to know that it CAN NOT be looped as you suggest.   

[The Eskimo Quinn]

For those of you who may be wondering if mechanics can manipulte energy this is a good example.

take a two litre coke bottle fill it turn it upside down and empty it an time it

now fill the same bottle but holding the base make circles with the bottom of the bottle whilst emtpying and the water will form a vortex and spray out almost twice as fast as before. and old physics lesson from school.

now the idiot says hey that is just extra energy provided by the hand, and engineer knows this is not quited true.

you see a spiral shape inside the botlle making it flow out that way is a fixed soilid object that contributes nothing in energy, yet the same thing happens, a vortex forms and the bottle empties faster.

mechanics can manipulate energy, in this case pressure and viscosity.

Just as the energy from the pressure of the water was always there, so too the energy from the magnets and gravity is always there. WE are not creating energy, simply manipulatimng what already exists. There is no magic, there is no defying the true laws of physics, we are simply defying the beliefs of narrow mined people, no different to the first guy who said hey, why dont we simply put a spiral in the bottle and make the water do the work.

Have no faer of the skeptics being right, physics is on our side because the energy already exists, my machine may not be the best, but it will certainly not be the only one, and the reason people need to know how to build each section and what reactions you get because if the building process is known an understood, people will take different roads, just like engines are powered by many forms of energy, and many simply manipulate the same energy in different ways.

You have seen more on this thread in new manipulation of magnetic energy than all the combined threads of all the sites of the entire world.

Has anyone seen one new magnetic manipulation on any other thread or site? I imagine there must be at least one. But certainly not the likes of loops, mayerniks, gate keys, chain reactions.

This thread "is" the world leader in this technology, and no one can say otherwise because they would have to prove it and could not.

The skeptics should think about that for a moment, all this new technology by luck or chance?

There may be maddness to my method, but no one can deny that it is working.

Do you all understand how the rods work? YES

Do you all understand what the wall is? YES

do you all understand the benefit of weight shift and gravity? YES

Do you all understand that without a wall all machines will run? YES

Do you all understand waht the gate key does? YES

Do you all see how parrallel mayerniks outperformed every right angle field track in history?YES

Do You all see what a chain reaction is, a series of single events working as one? YES

Do you all understand the gate key can fire the rods? YES

Do you all understand the greatest gain is from weight and gravity?YES

Do you all see that any number of combinations of these will work together? YES

Have we all seen the roller or wheel of many machines take off under its own power?YES

So do we all agree that we already have free energy amnd movement? YES

So we all agree that the combination of removing the wall and a machine that shows free energy and movement is the last stage? YES

So if we already have all the parts, we know each of them does what is required, what does Occam's razor tell you.


To say this thread has produced nothing are the words of those who are blind or require as there job to say otherwise.

You all saw what happend at each stage, you all saw that the claims were always the next satge could not be built, or what i had show could not be reproduced. So you see in real terms what would have happened to a vidoe of a working wheel, simply rebuilt in a manner that would not work, just as you have seen people do this with the stages. yet when others finally built, and the outcome was beyond question, we moved on.

Do you think they will stop it now? the roads are now splitting, with hundreds of combinations, each and every component known and built by others as working.

Give the man a fish and he has food for a day.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

at Ghwy

I was talking to someone the other day over the chain reaction sequence, and they suggested that it was likely the wheel was simply doing the same thing, that there was no "loop" from a magnetic sense but a sequence of single events that makes it do that,

I only admit to finding new designs and making them run, because they seem like logical steps. I do not profess to be the expert on the subject of interactive fields. The downside is, those who are the expetts failed to discover this, so what help can we expect from them? little or none, they may be able to give the technical reason it works, but unless you have the creative mind, you cannot advise on whre to ge next. This is whre "the expert says nope that is as far as it can go" yet before i came along, as far as it could go was a great deal further back. So People like exx and xx00013 and many others, who understand the real world, keep moving it along.

What is understanding the real world? simply that the guy who makes the next step or more likely correct than those who said even that step could not be made.

A true scientist says there are no limits to anything, thus the reason i say all NASA scientists are clowns, because they belive thermodynamics and physivcs has limits, just as magnetic field"experts" say the same.

The guys here who say "yes" we can always go further are more scientists than any clown at NASA who reapeats what he is told, and works with the building blocks he is given. In the real world, we build new blocks, nothing magic, no need ofr faked vidoes and the like. New blocks means hundreds of new toys. Stop thinking alomg the lines of the existing blocks, stick some chewing gum to you magnets see if it changes the fields. try anything out of the box, there is nothing new in the box

i once made a magnet hang in the air from another magnet above(both attarcted to each other), and that too is supposed to be impossible. (no others around or below) in fact as it defys gravity in free air is supposed to be more impossible than perpetual motion.

[capthook]

no because those of us who actually know something about electricity know that a circuit switch like the security sticker on an arm only needs pass the switch point and it will turn on, just like it sets off the alarm when you try to walk out the door with a video, no energy required

Yet again you claim knowledge yet prove your ignorance.

What makes an RFID tag work?
'Passive tags require no internal power source, thus being pure passive devices (they are only active when a reader is nearby to power them), whereas semi-passive and active tags require a power source, usually a small battery.'
So even a passive device requires POWER from the reader to operate.  Needing the POWER from the READER or a BATTERY in the tag factors into the operation of the device.
ALL SWITCHES are a net-loss in some way.
A reed switch is probably the least-lossy.  Even a purely mechanical switch results in losses due to friction.
So to say a device is OU because all you need to do is add a switch is 'Archurian Bullshit' yet again.

Still traveling - and read some of the early pages in this thread again for humor.
Your latest belief an RFID tag requires no power is yet another gaffe to add the the many.