Roll on the 20th June

[g4macdad]

What, did you get tired of beating macwife and iKids so you needed to come play web bully?

Well, between your two scenarios it's the first. But tell me, why can't someone's who's emphasis in college is energy systems and works for a f500 biz be interested in a man claiming to have done the impossible? Is it some unwritten law that you must be an uneducated auto mechanic to participate here? PopSci just had an article on a lab that used nanotubes to bend visible light (first step towards invisibility), am I allowed to take interest in that?

I didn't come here to insult AQ, I came to see him demonstrate something he had already discovered. Initially, I held out a helping hand to AQ, but the relationship turned sour when I started to tell him many of his theories were wrong. When  it became obvious (to some) that he had not yet discovered FE and was walking us down a dark alley of lies for financial/popularity gains, I started to uncover and prove he was incorrect.

If you don't understand this, then you're an idiot.

If you think I'm the one who first brought insults to this thread, you're an idiot.

If you haven't noticed my lack of insults in the last couple of weeks, you're an idiot.

If you think you can come to this thread and throw out insult after insult with no real contribution (though I did see you finally posted something with a lil content a while back, thanks for trying), you're an idiot.

And if you think the "your" used in your post is the correct use of the word and shouldn't be "you're," then you're an idiot.

Idiot.

-PurePower

Yes wer (we're) idiots. So was every great inventor in history, to people like you who SIT and criticize and insult. YOU ARE TRULY WORTHLESS!
I come here the same as you, but with a very different attitude and with an open mind.

AQ owes me and you nothing!

YOU(')R(E) an idiot!

[X00013]

And while we wait, and wait, and wait, enjoy this  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiyzj80bPEY

[X00013]

I hope you enjoyed that last vid post. Well now, to get back on subject, if you are building , post your F?kn videos, no? This is Overunity.com is it no? 100,000+ views and you have no input/builds? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otPEyWiowac

[gwhy!]

I hope you enjoyed that last vid post. Well now, to get back on subject, if you are building , post your F?kn videos, no? This is Overunity.com is it no? 100,000+ views and you have no input/builds? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otPEyWiowac

Very good demo. Thanks.

[exxcomm0n]

New vid, same crap.
(For those whining about my failed experiments, why don't you just skip this one. )

Trying some different configurations to see about varying the flux field using different arrays to see about closing the loop (which might not be a loop anymore, but more of a bi-level track).

Some tentative experiments with the hexagonal layout, but nothing even close to bullsnbears vid.

The idea is to try to add each MkE sequentially to see if it will stay true to effect and also allow closing the loop (although Thaelin seems to have reported negative results [POST SOME VIDS BUD! ]).

Nothing really worth watching.



Vid is here:

http://www.youtube.com/v/cEgPQV_ZtM4