Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

@ X00013

You hadn't posted in a while, so hard for me to comment on, or about you bud.

I like the latest vid, but expected you to "cabbage patch" and stuff in a psuedo-voodoo dance to influence the flux lines.

Keep questing man!
The reason I've finally given up on Archer is I was willing to cut him slack as long as he produced evidence of working towards a working wheel.
He's not posted here in a while after a tantrum about how he'd was only going to post where he could control content.
Then he closed the one place where that was a possibility for him with the parting comment that he was "leaving this monkey planet" at the end of the month and so proceeds from his designs that sell would have a very small window for re-imbursement for donations made to him.

If he doesn't provide evidence of working towards the goal of a working wheel, and then closes the one place he can discuss it, then I have to give up on giving him the benefit of the doubt.

P.S.  Exx, mate I never used your name when I made my earlier post yet you took it upon yourself to take it that I was talking about you... interesting no?  Seriously though, you needed to calm down a bit and I hope that you realise I wasn't actually looking for a perpetual bouncing ball...  then again I have in my hot little hands a 'documentary' made by disney called 'Flubber' that apparently has cracked the secret!  Rejoice everyone!

@ Bomber

Yeah....I did.

Maybe it was little pieces like (I had to go way back  over a month ago to see why I might have done so. If you're finally going to defend your statements a month after they were made, it'll take some time to see why I commented the way I did):

This post was inspired by Archer's latest rant on his site but it has been brewing within me for some time now fueled by not only Archer but other regular posters here also.

....and being a regular poster to the thread, of course I took it to be about me too as you later state:

Firstly, I would like to address the fact that over 95% of what has been posted in this thread is just useless filler.  It's not that impressive that there have been 5000 posts made when a couple hundred would have sufficed.  Anything productive is quickly buried by waves of petty, immature, off topic tit-for-tat bs.  It really is amazing to witness allegedly mature and intelligent people argue like 4 year olds...  In fact, I would be ashamed if I had a 4 year that acted as pathetically as a few regular posters in this thread.

so....between being a regular poster, AND 95% of the thread being "useless filler", just about anyone who'd made more than 3 posts to the thread would be well justified in thinking you were talking about them and calling them a 4 yo.

You will perhaps notice that I did NOT disagree with the comments made about Archer's "tormented genius", but only about the fact that you spent a lot of time "dick-waving" to complain about the useless "dick-waving", and I saw it as ironic.

As for the allegorical allusion to the perpetually bouncing ball......

I am one of the brainwashed but I want to believe.  I am agent Mulder looking for the answers but so far I can't see them.  If I take a ball and drop it it bounces a couple of times and stops... Damn you Newton!  I need you to show me the ball bouncing forever or even higher than it did before before I can say that Newton was a fool...  What you are doing is asking me to say that on faith that you have what you say you have.

You had to read a bit farther than my reply to your post to see anything about my reference to the bouncing ball (in fact, to a post replying to  Cap't defending your post in one he made later).
Might you also have endeavored to read all the way to your post here to see that I have finally given Archer a deadline (since he's missed all the ones he set for himself) of (by now) 2 more days to make good and show us all what monkeys we are?

But since you've been following this thread so far for so long to be ashamed of us 4 year olds, you should know that allegorical statements like you made are just as likely to get commented on as any other point of your post in a rather ironic fashion.

But if you have Flubber that works, you're doing better than most of us.

P.P.S  Not sure if I am making a dolt of myself here but doesn't it make sense that the attraction part of the magnet should be avoided in these experiments and concentration purely on replusion be examined to try and get away from the whole wall issue?
Getting back to the original wheel concept, my mind sees magnets lined up so that only repulsions is used to move weights.  No attract so that there is no or very little hold effect or 'wall'... has this been examined before?

I'll be damned!

Real content!

But to address your ideas above, a mag has 2 walls. The wall it has to overcome in repulsion mode (to get past the apex point of the 2 repelling polarities) and the wall of attraction mode (the wall keeping you from breaking away from attraction).
If either of these walls can be negated or mitigated, then power from magnetic motors is possible, but so far neither is succumbing to negation.

Keep trying though!

[bullsnbears1]

F?ck u all,          Archer kicks ass!!!!!!.............part one             http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbxpq4g0RT4     
                                                               part two            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTFg15uGIrQ
                                                               part three           http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2cCys217gI

X0000000000000000, are these new videos from you? Why are they gone already, it says they are removed?

[ramset]

@ All don't lose focus!! 
@Batman thanks     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYPjGn-hP8A&feature=related   
Chet

[capthook]

So, looks like EVERYONE has finally realized the a.q. truth? Rather than just the few 'oilmen' that called b.s. from the beginning?
From the get-go, his story of the original device construction/destruction was at best a tall-tale and warranted the label of nut-job.  What followed just continued to reinforce it.

The two least-surprising things by archer:
1. nothing even close to an OU/PM device.
2. disappearing into the ether with his vaporware

Damn oilmen!  They ruined it all and destroyed a chance at saving the world!

top ten list: archer b.s.

1. destroyed original device so as to not destroy 3rd world economy
2. i can kick Newtons ass six ways to Sunday building six different OU devices
3. complete device plans given to several others as security
4. so easy to build a dumb blonde could understand it
5. 100kg man on 900kg balanced wheel equals 1000kg of usable energy
6. gravity propels and maintains the orbits of satellites
7. posting device construction build instructions tonight (4 months ago)
8. device used 1 electromagnet.  device used 3 electromagnets
9. switches on device were operated by hand
10. selling plans for $2,000 payable 30-days in advance

Honorable mentions:
- the moon landing was faked
- li-ion batteries are crap vs. alkaline - alkaline will always outperform
- sunscreen causes skin cancer
- milk and the calcium in it causes brittle bones
- rfid tags require no energy
- giving away trillions in inventions for just $5
- I'm one of the smartest people ever born
- 'archurian physics'
- fuckwit, clown, oilman, dickhead, idiot, moron, fuckhead

Feel free to add to the list as these are just the ones pulled off the top of my head....
there are plenty more!

And for like the 6th time:
Thanks for trying
Thanks for showing

But those 2 things can't make up for the 400 or so negatives..... dolt!

[capthook]

and oh.... as to the mag switch.....

I've been muking around with the idea a little bit.  The idea of affecting 1 magnet with a 2nd remote magnet over an airgap seems it could offer something?

As to if x>y+z , it might not need to be if it can accomplish the needed 'boost' over an airgap with an appreciable reduction of energy input manipulating the remote magnet vs. one in close proximity/contact.

There was brief discussion earlier over 'pole flipping'.  Noticed something last night - a ceramic mag WILL pole flip.
Take a stack of neos, push a small ceramic in repulsion towards it, 'sticking' it to the stack - it will pole-flip into attraction!  I was like whoa - what just happened?  Did that ceramic just pole flip?  Sure enough!  Guess the domains of a ceramic mag are easy to re-align.

And the steel bars used to show the mag switch effect are actually detrimental.  They diffuse the field.  To use a stack of neos on their own, over an airgap is far superior than introducing steel bars and bolts into the equation.