Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



elemental rod

Started by slayer007, April 25, 2008, 01:16:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pese

Quote from: Koen1 on July 14, 2008, 05:09:50 AM
Great pese,

but I guess you missed the quote from dr Schwartz where he says
the story about 73/74 elements was just a ruse?
;)
Jes possibly (i also think so), but from the jap. inventor  to save his
knowledges. BUT that say: 73 74 hase nothing zo do with the "tabele of elements"
Pese
Skype Member: pesetr (daily 21:00-22:00 MEZ (Berlin) Like to discussing. German English Flam's French. Special knowledges in "electronic area need?
ask by messey, will help- so i can...

Power Technology

Hi,

I’m new to the group. The reason that I joined is because someone told me that this is the best alternative and free-energy group on the net. My partner and I are always on the lookout for the elusive Free-Energy Device that really works. I was really surprised to see Dr. Schwartz’s ERR Technology being discussed in the group. My company is very familiar with his research.     
I first met Dr. Schwartz back in Jan. of 1998 when my wife and I went to the Philippines to visit her parents. While we were there her father asked if I would like to go with him to a lecture at the University of the Philippines. The lecture was about alternative energy given by Dr. J. B. Schwartz from the Noah’s Ark Research Foundation. The lecture started at 8 am and ended at 12 noon. During the whole four hour lecture Dr. Schwartz powered his public address system, an old 17 in. black and white television and two 100-watt light bulbs. He spoke about many different kinds of alternative energy but the one that I was most impressed with was has Electromagnetic Radiation Receiver that he was powering all his equipment with. At first I was skeptical about his ERR as he called it because it looked too small and light to be used to run all his equipment.

His ERR device consisted of two rods which I believed to be nano-tubes, two copper coils on two very strong magnets about an inch or more apart, a complicated looking circuit board, a small DC volt meter and some three prong electrical outlets all mounted on a thin piece of plywood. At the beginning of his lecture I noticed that the reading on the voltmeter was reading 15.4 to 16.6 DC volts and after four hours later it was still reading the same.

I asked him if the ERR could be moved from the table to another part of the room and still produce power. He agreed and unplugged his pa system and allowed three people from the audience to carry the ERR, the television and the inverter to different parts of the room and it didn’t seem to affect its power output at all. We were also allowed to examine the table and it proved to be a light-folding table. I found no source of power other than the ERR itself. The only thing that I found to be strange was when I used his metal ruler to test the magnets; I accidentally put the ruler across both magnets and the power shut down. Dr. Schwartz seemed to be a little upset because of the difficulty pulling the metal ruler off the magnets. After the ruler was removed the power came back on. When I asked him why the power went off he said that I shouldn’t short the magnets because it could damage the unit. He seemed irritated with me so I didn’t persist any farther. 
         
After his lecture I asked him if he could meet with my company to talk about possible investment in his ERR technology but he didn’t seem too interested in taking to investors.

Soon after returning to the US I was able to convince my partner that it would be worth it if we donated $100,000 to the Noah’s Ark Research Foundation. About a month later the money was returned to our bank. After many emails Dr. Schwartz replied, â€Ã...“I don’t except money from investors.â€Ã,
I figured that he was pissed at me because I shorted his unit. I later found out from a source in Arizona that he’s financially well off plus he’s a save the world freak and a very difficult person to work with.

My partner thinks that he must have been transmitting the power from outside the room and picking it up with his ERR but I don’t think so. He also thought that he made bank interest on our money before he sent it back so I checked with Dr. Schwartz’s bank and they said that no interest was made on our money. They said that they had instructions from Dr. Schwartz to return the money to the sender and that he didn’t give any reason.

For several years I hadn’t heard much about Dr. Schwartz’s ERR until 2003 when I went to Japan to see a device at the University of Tokushima. After seeing both Dr. Schwartz’s ERR back in 1998 and the one at the University of Tokushima in 2003 I’m now convinced that both are using the same basic technology.

The professor was not much help as far as answering my questions. It seems that the university is keeping most of their research a secret. When I asked him about Dr. Schwartz’s ERR he acknowledged knowing about it from a demonstration given by Dr. Schwartz to a group of Japanese scientist in Tokyo. After he learned that I had met with Dr. Schwartz and seen the ERR he quickly cut off our meeting. I could tell by his voice that he don’t like Dr. Schwartz, in fact he spoke for at least a minute or more but all my translator said was â€Ã...“I no think he like Dr. Schwartzâ€Ã,.

One of the students that I met there told me that professor Akamatsu had tried to get Dr. Schwartz to join their research project but he turned him down.

Everyone that I talked to said that Dr. Schwartz is a real strange person and he doesn’t trust anyone; it’s not easy to gain his trust.

While I was in Japan I also checked on a group of Japanese that had setup a research facility in the mountains because I found out that Dr. Schwartz worked there back in 2005. When I tried to find out more about the facility it seems that Dr. Schwartz had quit because the Japanese investors wanted to sell has ERR technology to the government and not for public use.

After a little more investigation I was able to find out more about his ERR Company that was closed down apparently by the Japanese Government. It seems that the government pad locked his factory and warehouse because they claimed the 300 and 900 watt ERR units were not safety tested by any agency such as UL and they considered them dangerous. Over sixty thousand of the ERR units were destroyed and the case against Dr. Schwartz’s Company was dismissed. I think I understand why he doesn’t trust anyone.
     
I had the Japanese newspaper article about the University of Tokushima’s research translated into English so that I could include it in this post.

Japan Economic Newspaper June 3, 2002
Carbon nano meter tube utilization
Solar cell generator developed by the university of Tokushima

Professor Akamatsu of the University of Tokushima and JGS Co. a venture enterprise (Tokyo, Bungkyou and President is Mr. Jin Kitamura) have jointly developed a new type of the Solar Cell generator using carbon nano tube. They confirmed basic capacity with 8 percent conversion efficient to electricity as early stage.

They say there are rooms to improve the efficient to overcome that of the existing solar battery.
Carbon nano tube has a capability to emit electrons out of its tip when energy is given from outside. They made a system consist of two rods faced on each other a nano tube array on the carbon wafer and a stainless receiver rod.

They tested 3cm by 3cm tow rods placed in the 5cm diameter, 10cm height glass bottle Distance between two rods is 0.5mm. They succeeded to extract 7.5percent of solar energy as electric energy.
The conversion efficient can improve to make a uniform of nano tube array in a direction and distance between two rods short. The existing solar battery using silicon semiconductor is mainly used blue part of the light spectrum to convert to electricity. But this one can use the broad band of the spectrum from UV to far infrared. JGS Co. estimated they could get 4-5 times more efficient than that silicon type solar battery.

Tim


Quote from: zapnic on June 24, 2008, 03:54:42 PM
and more for same man
"
I've been looking for a dedicated Tesla group and unfortunately it's
not easy to find. I joined one group called the
teslainformationexchange@yahoogroups.com started by a guy named Neal
from The International Tesla Institute. It turned out to be nothing
but a  and Spam group that was disgracing the name of Tesla. Our
Atty. Is trying to find out who this Neal guy is. It's good to know
that I finally found a group of real Tesla fans here at USA-Tesla.

I'll start by answering Bert and JB's questions.

I am quite interested in the research you describe. In particular, can
you provide more information about the actual theory and operation of
your magnetic generator? Any closeup photos of the unit?

I posted a drawing of the flat electromagnetic panel in the group
files. I used four special Aluminum alloy plates that are 1/16th of an
inch thick by 11 ? inches wide by 7 ? inch high and placed three
1/16th inch Bismuth sheets between the Aluminum plates. Then I used
two very powerful flat permanent magnets (3''X3/4''X1/8'') attached in
the center of the plates. A special gold plated wire that is coated
with clear insulation is used to create a coil to flex the magnetic
field of the magnets. A special frequency generator is used to induce
a series of alternating frequencies to create a flow of electrons when
activating the magnetic field. We are presently experimenting with
replacing the Aluminum and bismuth with different material such as
Magnesium, Beryllium and graphite which has been showing better output
than the Aluminum and Bismuth.

I put some good photos of our prototype #8 in the group photos.

Question
This device appears to be related to the "elemental rod generator"
that was previously marketed in Japan by the ERR Company. In a
translation of the Japanese marketing documents, the inventor is
appears to also be a Dr. Schwartz from the Noah's Ark Research
Foundation. Are these units being offered for sale today?

Answer
Yes, this is related to the Rod Generator. That video was taken in
1988 by a friend of mine who came to visit me in the Philippines. His
video cam was stolen from his bag on his way back to the US so who
ever posted that video is still a mystery. Because he was planning on
showing the video to some people in the US we decided to say that one
rod contained 73 elements and the other 74. That was only to confuse
people so that they wouldn't know how really simple the rods were. I
considered my first Rod Generator a toy that needed a lot of research
and testing.

Back in 2002 my board of directors talked me into marketing small Rod
Generators to help poor countries. We pooled our money to set up a
small manufacturing plant to build our Rod Generators. We were
planning on selling them at cost to help do our part to save the world
form the Oil Companies. A week later we got a notice from the Dept. of
Energy in Japan that required the Rod Generator to be safety checked
by their laboratory before it could be sold in Japan. It took them
almost six months to test it before we received notice that it was
unsafe for public use. All the units that we had already manufactured
plus our jigs and dies had to be destroyed. That really hurt me and my
partners because we put a lot of money into that project. Since our
wife's told us not to put money into the Rod Generator we now have to
live with the old "I told you so". At least we learned a very
important lesson, I will never try to market one of my ERR generators.
When I have finished my ERR research and I fully understand how it
works, we plan on posting it on the internet. My board of directs and
myself are the ones that fund all of our Noah's Ark Research
facilities so we have no investors to account to.

Since I do a lot of lectures at different Universities we decided to
keep the big business interest and the people from the oil companies
from trying to figure out my new ERR. They like to send their people
to take close-up pictures so they can study my prototype but it won't
do them any good because we only use a small portion of the circuit
board that you see in the photos, the rest is just for show. We're
making sure that OPEC and the powerful companies don't patent my ERR
technology to keep it from the people.

Question
An earlier prototype version is apparently being demonstrated here ?
are you the demonstrator in these videos?
http://video. Google.com/ videoplay? Docid=-635987818 295327978
http://video. Google.com/ videoplay? Docid=-429834766 9641896403

Answer
Yes, this was prototype #7 that I used in my lectures at the
University of the Philippines. One of the students that attended my
lectures more than likely posted it to Google Video since many like to
take videos and still shots.

As you can see in the video I used a special flat panel alloy instead
of the rods. The big problem with prototype #7 was too much
fluctuation in output plus burned out components in the controller
that stabilized the electromagnetic field. Our latest prototype #8 is
the one that I posted in the group photos. Even though this one seems
to work very well it still needs a lot of testing.

Question
Do you have much trouble getting that "electromagnetic briefcase"
shown in the video at the above link onto airplanes when travelling?

Answer
Yes, the first time that I tried to take prototype #7 on one of my
lectures outside the country I got stopped by the airport security
because the electromagnetic field interfered with the x-ray machine.
It caused static on their screen. The inspectors were afraid because
they didn't understand how it worked. Because the unit was capable of
putting out a great deal of power without any batteries they were
afraid that it might be radiative. After x-raying it several times and
using a Geiger counter to check for radiation they finally allowed it
to be checked in only but not in my carry-on bag. I don't have any
problem with my latest ERR because it doesn't interfere with their
x-ray; it just looks like a metal plate with a circuit board when they
see it on their screen so they don't bother to ask me to open my bag.

Question
Re: The "left hand rule" anomalies you mentioned, I have noticed
variations or odd things about written about it by people in the
Northern Hemisphere vs the Southern Hemisphere in the assortment of
Electrician' s text books

Answer
The left hand rule is a very interesting research. We have noticed
many variations in our experimental coils at our facility in India
compared to the coils in Japan and the Philippines. It's best that I
don't go any farther on this subject because this could take hours and
twenty pages of text to explain. And the truth is that after all that
explaining you would be very confused. I'm even confused myself
because we are sometimes having difficulty replicating some of our
experiments. As we learn more about this theory I will post it. This
is much better because then I won't look like a fool trying to explain
parts of our theory that is still not fully understood.

Thanks for the information about photobucket, I'll check it out.

Our Foundation is planning on building a world class Tesla Museum, we
could really use any good ideas or thoughts that you might have. We
are presently setting up a planning committee.

And thanks again for the warm welcome; I look forward to a long and
lasting relationship with the group.

Dr. Schwartz (or just Ben will do fine)"

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/usa-tesla/



mhhh maybe invate Dr. Schwartz to come here?



Koen1

Thank you for your story, Tim! :)

This is quite interesting stuff.
I dislike using Yahoo and no longer have an account there so I cannot join
the Yahoo group, but I would like to attempt replication...
Or at least, I would like to know more about the setup, how it works,
and how we can make a version (or a device to similar effect).

Could you perhaps suggest to Dr Schwartz that he visit this forum
if and when he has a chance, so he can share his knowledge
first-hand? 

In any case, welcome to the forum, and I look forward to reading more
on this interesting subject. :)


newpowertechnology

I would like to inform any members that have tried to email me at powertechnology@live.com or powertechnology1933@live.com  that these email addresses was hacked and they changed our password which locked us out. I was unable to get any assistance from Windows live.com so I had to setup a new email address which is newpowertechnology@yahoo.com Who ever hacked into our old email accounts was really good, they were able to completely lock us out. They even changed my secret question and answer so I couldnââ,¬â,,¢t change it back. Weââ,¬â,,¢re pretty sure that it was one of our employeeââ,¬â,,¢s at our Asian office.
   
Anyone that has sent mail to my old live.com address please resend it to my new yahoo.com at newpowertechnology@yahoo.com Please resend all the email that you sent to our old address. 
Tim


Quote from: Power Technology on September 11, 2008, 07:52:31 AM
Hi,

I’m new to the group. The reason that I joined is because someone told me that this is the best alternative and free-energy group on the net. My partner and I are always on the lookout for the elusive Free-Energy Device that really works. I was really surprised to see Dr. Schwartz’s ERR Technology being discussed in the group. My company is very familiar with his research.     
I first met Dr. Schwartz back in Jan. of 1998 when my wife and I went to the Philippines to visit her parents. While we were there her father asked if I would like to go with him to a lecture at the University of the Philippines. The lecture was about alternative energy given by Dr. J. B. Schwartz from the Noah’s Ark Research Foundation. The lecture started at 8 am and ended at 12 noon. During the whole four hour lecture Dr. Schwartz powered his public address system, an old 17 in. black and white television and two 100-watt light bulbs. He spoke about many different kinds of alternative energy but the one that I was most impressed with was has Electromagnetic Radiation Receiver that he was powering all his equipment with. At first I was skeptical about his ERR as he called it because it looked too small and light to be used to run all his equipment.

His ERR device consisted of two rods which I believed to be nano-tubes, two copper coils on two very strong magnets about an inch or more apart, a complicated looking circuit board, a small DC volt meter and some three prong electrical outlets all mounted on a thin piece of plywood. At the beginning of his lecture I noticed that the reading on the voltmeter was reading 15.4 to 16.6 DC volts and after four hours later it was still reading the same.

I asked him if the ERR could be moved from the table to another part of the room and still produce power. He agreed and unplugged his pa system and allowed three people from the audience to carry the ERR, the television and the inverter to different parts of the room and it didn’t seem to affect its power output at all. We were also allowed to examine the table and it proved to be a light-folding table. I found no source of power other than the ERR itself. The only thing that I found to be strange was when I used his metal ruler to test the magnets; I accidentally put the ruler across both magnets and the power shut down. Dr. Schwartz seemed to be a little upset because of the difficulty pulling the metal ruler off the magnets. After the ruler was removed the power came back on. When I asked him why the power went off he said that I shouldn’t short the magnets because it could damage the unit. He seemed irritated with me so I didn’t persist any farther. 
         
After his lecture I asked him if he could meet with my company to talk about possible investment in his ERR technology but he didn’t seem too interested in taking to investors.

Soon after returning to the US I was able to convince my partner that it would be worth it if we donated $100,000 to the Noah’s Ark Research Foundation. About a month later the money was returned to our bank. After many emails Dr. Schwartz replied, â€Ã...“I don’t except money from investors.â€Ã,
I figured that he was pissed at me because I shorted his unit. I later found out from a source in Arizona that he’s financially well off plus he’s a save the world freak and a very difficult person to work with.

My partner thinks that he must have been transmitting the power from outside the room and picking it up with his ERR but I don’t think so. He also thought that he made bank interest on our money before he sent it back so I checked with Dr. Schwartz’s bank and they said that no interest was made on our money. They said that they had instructions from Dr. Schwartz to return the money to the sender and that he didn’t give any reason.

For several years I hadn’t heard much about Dr. Schwartz’s ERR until 2003 when I went to Japan to see a device at the University of Tokushima. After seeing both Dr. Schwartz’s ERR back in 1998 and the one at the University of Tokushima in 2003 I’m now convinced that both are using the same basic technology.

The professor was not much help as far as answering my questions. It seems that the university is keeping most of their research a secret. When I asked him about Dr. Schwartz’s ERR he acknowledged knowing about it from a demonstration given by Dr. Schwartz to a group of Japanese scientist in Tokyo. After he learned that I had met with Dr. Schwartz and seen the ERR he quickly cut off our meeting. I could tell by his voice that he don’t like Dr. Schwartz, in fact he spoke for at least a minute or more but all my translator said was â€Ã...“I no think he like Dr. Schwartzâ€Ã,.

One of the students that I met there told me that professor Akamatsu had tried to get Dr. Schwartz to join their research project but he turned him down.

Everyone that I talked to said that Dr. Schwartz is a real strange person and he doesn’t trust anyone; it’s not easy to gain his trust.

While I was in Japan I also checked on a group of Japanese that had setup a research facility in the mountains because I found out that Dr. Schwartz worked there back in 2005. When I tried to find out more about the facility it seems that Dr. Schwartz had quit because the Japanese investors wanted to sell has ERR technology to the government and not for public use.

After a little more investigation I was able to find out more about his ERR Company that was closed down apparently by the Japanese Government. It seems that the government pad locked his factory and warehouse because they claimed the 300 and 900 watt ERR units were not safety tested by any agency such as UL and they considered them dangerous. Over sixty thousand of the ERR units were destroyed and the case against Dr. Schwartz’s Company was dismissed. I think I understand why he doesn’t trust anyone.
     
I had the Japanese newspaper article about the University of Tokushima’s research translated into English so that I could include it in this post.

Japan Economic Newspaper June 3, 2002
Carbon nano meter tube utilization
Solar cell generator developed by the university of Tokushima

Professor Akamatsu of the University of Tokushima and JGS Co. a venture enterprise (Tokyo, Bungkyou and President is Mr. Jin Kitamura) have jointly developed a new type of the Solar Cell generator using carbon nano tube. They confirmed basic capacity with 8 percent conversion efficient to electricity as early stage.

They say there are rooms to improve the efficient to overcome that of the existing solar battery.
Carbon nano tube has a capability to emit electrons out of its tip when energy is given from outside. They made a system consist of two rods faced on each other a nano tube array on the carbon wafer and a stainless receiver rod.

They tested 3cm by 3cm tow rods placed in the 5cm diameter, 10cm height glass bottle Distance between two rods is 0.5mm. They succeeded to extract 7.5percent of solar energy as electric energy.
The conversion efficient can improve to make a uniform of nano tube array in a direction and distance between two rods short. The existing solar battery using silicon semiconductor is mainly used blue part of the light spectrum to convert to electricity. But this one can use the broad band of the spectrum from UV to far infrared. JGS Co. estimated they could get 4-5 times more efficient than that silicon type solar battery.

Tim