David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

[markdansie]

@David
the other devices i also reviewed, tested or other wise also got up to 5 x the run time or power output over the battery ratings, so I do understand what you are seeing.This is for a lot of reasons both I and others have listed, but you only see what you want to see,
That is fine, I am sure in another 5 years we will have the same conversation
I am not sure you  understand or why you ignor others who have a gone before you (and in some cases after)
Mark

[mscoffman]

DBowling,

You tend to talk too much. :-) You should be showing computer generated graphs.

My tendancy is to roughly monitor the voltage on each battery using the CV control
voltage inputs on multiple CMOS NE555's one for each battery. Feed the digital AC into
a capacitively coupled multiplexor to a computer controller like an Audino so that it
can keep track of the voltage on each battery.

Then use the computer controller to reconfigure the circuit using latching relays
(which draw power only when being reconfiured) to discharge the excess energy
into a headlamp load with high and low voltage setpoints. As the system
recharges itself the charge/discharge frequency will increase as the system
reaches maximum charge at which time the the load can be run for a very long
time to discharge the batteries to a nice low level. Then start the recycling
recharge again. Where is the excess energy to recharge the system coming
from?

Whether it works with capacitors or not, is dependent on whether LENR in
the Acid/Lead battery is where the extra energy is coming from, or is being
static-electricity voltage downconverted from. So that is worth a try, but
show it with the graphics, that is.

Don't tell critics about it...show them about it.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Dbowling]

Marl,
I appreciate that. It will take me some time and some money to put that all together, but that sounds like a worthwhile setup to use for testing. I will see what I can do. And you are right. I get excited and talk WAY too much. ;-)


Dave

[Dbowling]

I have been thinking about this. Since I have a two channel scope, why don't I simply connect one channel to each of the primary batteries. It will show the voltage on the battery at the bottom of the screen. The dead batteries remain dead, and the buffer battery remains flat at whatever voltage it was when you started the system. So if the motor is running for many hours or days, where does the power come from if those primaries do not change in voltage, or go up? I can scope the voltage in the dead batteries and the buffer battery with my OTHER scope, and though I don't have enough scopes to have one on every battery, I can scope beginning and ending voltages in a run cycle. Would this be sufficient? It would seem to me that a scope would be far more accurate than a cheap battery tester would be.


Dave

[profitis]

idono man idono.maybe that 3rd bat isnt needed at all.maybe because of backspiking any bat would register a longer amphour on any motor straight.a semi-recycling of energy going on.much like any inductor circuit on this website.