Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

Started by sterlinga, April 30, 2008, 10:56:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MileHigh on June 15, 2016, 02:13:47 AM
Brad:

These are your initial comments about the current waveform:

You also said this about the waveform:

  and "high amount of inductive spikes."  Assuming that's true, you can see how you made a huge mistake.  You led yourself down a garden path, and took your followers on this thread along with you down that path, with the result being that you and your followers were all lost with respect to how the input side of the inverter draws power from the battery. 

  I was hoping that you would take a second look at the way the inverter was drawing power from the battery and document it properly so that you and your peers and would all be properly informed about how the input side of the inverter actually worked.

"Dribble" and "idiotic comments" my ass.  You are bluffing.  Just the fact that you refuse to address anything technical in my posting says it all.  For the benefit of yourself and your peers on this thread you need to understand how the input side of the inverter draws current from the battery because that directly affects how the third battery in the charging position gets charged.  If you had listened to me and shown initiative and redid your current sensing resistor measurements and posted what looked like good credible data for yourself and your peers I would not even be here.

MileHigh

QuoteBelow is a scope shot across a CVR,showing the input current wave form to the inverter.
As you can see,it is the same as a pure sine wave inverters input wave form.
These are the spikes those on the other forum are speaking of on the input,that is one of the reasons that this setup works as claimed-!i believe!?.
As the batteries will only see the input side of the inverter,and not the output side of the inverter,i am at a loss as to why it has to be a pure sine wave inverter?,as battery regulation has nothing to do with the output of the inverter.

And what is wrong with what i stated above?

QuoteIt looks to me like you are confusing standard back-EMF spikes from a coil, with the current spikes that represent the way the inverter is drawing current from the battery feed.

looks to me that you have put your foot in your mouth again,and made some more incorrect assumptions ;).

QuoteThat's why you are saying "quite reactive"

Reactive-->showing a response to a stimulus.
-->acting in response to a situation rather than creating or controlling it.

QuoteThe only reason that I came here is because you refused to respond to the initial comment I made on the other thread so as to not disturb this thread.

Then you obviously did not get the message ::)
I did not wish to respond to your comment--i told you i was done with you and your stupidity.
But now--now you come here to start your shit all over again-->please go away-you have no reason at all to be on this thread.


Brad

hoptoad

Quote from: tinman on June 15, 2016, 06:49:18 AM
snip...
Then you obviously did not get the message ::)
snip...
LOL. Reminds me of a friend who often resorts to the expression, "There's no need to repeat yourself. I'm not deaf, I'm ignoring you".  :)

MileHigh

Brad:

You are an amateur comic with the trotting out of the dictionary definition for "reactive."  You didn't have to respond to me at all.  All that you had to do was redo that ridiculous farce of a current measurement and get it right and present good data to your peers.

MileHigh

hoptoad

Quote from: MileHigh on June 15, 2016, 12:13:53 AM
snip...
Like I told you before, I haven't been on a bench in 25 years, I have never used a DSO, but I could still spin circles around you on a bench with my eyes closed.  snip..

MileHigh
A bold claim that will never be proven by you without visible evidence of bench activity to back it up.

MileHigh

Quote from: hoptoad on June 15, 2016, 07:57:42 AM
A bold claim that will never be proven by you without visible evidence of bench activity to back it up.

Sure, that's the ticket.  I have done tons of analysis over the years and anybody that knows their stuff could easily qualify me.  In fact, my skills are already known and you are just bluffing.  Your real issue is Brad's failed attempt to measure the current input of the inverter.  Forget about some meaningless deflection by challenging me.  If you want to do something sensible, encourage Brad to redo his measurement and get it right because right now nobody knows how the input of the inverter works.