How to make bedini motor overunity ???

[DMMPOWER]

Hi here is a super electromagnet pulse coil design . 

[otto]

Hello all,

@capacitor 70

In the first moment I saw the picture of your Bedini motor replication I thought Im looking at a TV deflection coil!! - the inner coil.

The outer coil is wound over 2 cores.....

Sorry for jumping into here.

Otto

[gyulasun]

Hi here is a super electromagnet pulse coil design . 

@DMMPOWER

Could you share some more practical pieces of advice on the core type, core shape and how the permanent magnet is embedded into the core?  (is the magnet shorter than the core like you showed, how airgap is involved between core and magnet, etc.) 
Perhaps a picture upload?  Here in the thread you can upload smaller than 50kB files but at this link you can upload up to 5MB:  http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=upload  with files type like: zip, rar, doc, jpg, gif, png, avi, mov, mpg, mpeg, qt, swf, pdf, odt, rm, ra

Thanks,

Gyula

[capacitor70]

Hello all,

@capacitor 70

In the first moment I saw the picture of your Bedini motor replication I thought Im looking at a TV deflection coil!! - the inner coil.

The outer coil is wound over 2 cores.....

Sorry for jumping into here.

Otto

I have seen TV yoke coils, I thing these coils are useful for making "cole window motor".

The rotor is taken from VCR motor it is already having three windings on it, These windings are not used at all.
Two relay coils are used in this. one coil acts as pulse pick up coil and another as drive.
See video on youtube search for "Capacitor70"
I tried using 5 coils as drive and one coil as pulse pick up, it doesent make any change in input or output.

Another coil I made it gives me very high rpm vibrating my work bench at 200mAmps and it is giving 50% energy as back emf.

With the same coil but rotor is changed to little more weight its back emf is reduced to 5% also speed.

My observation
1. Use less weight for rotor.
2. Use stronger magnets.
3. More number of magnets.
4. Proper coil design also important.
5. Multiple coils doesnt make big differance.
6. If you put magnet in revese direction on coils so that it repail the rotor. When you start it, It makes vibrating motor.
7. Alternating N - S - N - S - N magnet placement does not make any big differance only speed reduction is observed.

[Ren]

My observation
1. Use less weight for rotor.
2. Use stronger magnets.
3. More number of magnets.
4. Proper coil design also important.
5. Multiple coils doesnt make big differance.
6. If you put magnet in revese direction on coils so that it repail the rotor. When you start it, It makes vibrating motor.
7. Alternating N - S - N - S - N magnet placement does not make any big differance only speed reduction is observed.

Thats funny Capacitor70, I found the following results when building Bedinis devices:

1. More weight on the rotor the better, (within reason) as long as it is well balanced.
2. Use weaker magnets for faster switching, stronger magnets such as neos can only work in certain configurations
3. More magnets, but keep the correct spacing
4. Proper coil design IS important, Your right about that.
5. Multiple coils makes a BIG difference as does multiple windings when wired correctly, both to speed and charging of the back end.
6.?
7. In one of my configurations a nsnsnsns rotor gave an increase in speed over the nnnn rotor. This was with neos and air cores.