Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

[buzz-ard]

The answer is easy: when I connect a bulb and have a good frequency mix, I SEE that the current from my power supply is CONSTANT!!! In some cases - very good frequency mixes - I saw, when a bulb is connected, the current DROPPS!!!!

This means that my coils are really not good because all the current from my power supply is needed to run the coils and NOT the load.

@otto - Great advice! When my coils are good, I see exactly the same thing. Bad coil designs require more amperage for the same work.

[altium]

Little corrected schem:

[innovation_station]

yep what i have been working on is compleatly diffrent 

sorry guys

i can not offer any help .....

when i apply 5 amps to my lil setup  woooooh  DONT TOUCH THE WIRES......

hell when i use 1 amp i would not want to touch the wires  plused dc need i say more  oh hand plused dc 

ist

[wattsup]

Hot is not the word. Burning hot is more like it. When I first did some tests on my yoke, the device was on my office table that has the regular hard enamelled melamine finish. Well I now have a nice round sun ray shaped burn mark on it. A permanent reminder of OU heat. Next time I take a photo of something on my table you will see it.

@otto

I am very glad that you are the one saying this in your last post and not me. If it was me, someone would say I don't know what I am doing. lol (Geez, they may be right also.)

I have noticed this from the beginning even with only one frequency. Just looking at the wiring diagrams spells power supply directly on low turns coils and on load. This spells close to short circuit and coil heat.

The coils would have to have more turns in order to produce a separation from the short circuit potential to become more of an inductive component.

With all the greatest respect for you and your endeavors,  what I feel is missing on the outset is a comprehensive theory (or intent) for the basic operation that can be the ultimate goal and from there, work the various effects involved. I know, I know what you will say. "But this is pure pioneering in new directions", which is very true but I am sure you have some idea of what you want to achieve or what you think is actually happenning in the device.

The more I play with this and the more I re-think what you have said about your own device especially when it has produced the bright light, the more I realize that the patent I had presented for seismic measurements, where they are using two frequencies on coils to neutralize the field like a degausing action, the more I am convinced this is what is happening with your device.

Remember when I had always stated this is brute force voltage applied to some scranny coils and there is no wonder it is producing both heat and lighting a light. Except that the high frequency pulsations could never be responsible for such an action since high frequency pulsing reduces the power and current applied to the coils. The faster you go, the less power is supplied because the 50% duty is less and less when you consider that each pulse will have its gradual up and down slope. You would have to increase the applied power as the frequency increases in order to compensate and maintain the same level of stress on the coils.

But what if the right frequency mix is causing a pulsed degausing of the coils. Then it is the degausing that is in control of the greatest pulsing action and not the frequencies themselves. If the degausing is causing the field to drop to zero in a much more forceful way then if you simply cut off the power. Said another way, instead of the traditional method of pusling applying voltage, from zero to 24 volts, on and off, on and off, imagine leaving the voltage at 24 volts all the time and simply degausing the field, on and off, on and off. The field would retract on degausing but the momentum is still active in the coil. When the degausing stops, the field JUMPS BACK without requiring the voltage rise. The PUNCH would be much greater then any other form of pulsing possible. The question is what frequency mix would cause a coil to degause.

Maybe said another way, what would produce more effect. If you had a 100 foot water hose and turned the valve at the beginning open and closed, open and closed, how would the water flow from the end, compared to if you put the valve at the end with pressure in the hose at all times and then opened and closed the end valve. The later would provide much more PUNCH because there is no pressure build up time required in the hose, the pressure is already there. The water would react instantly to the valve position. Pulsed degausing would be like the valve placed at the end of the pressurized hose.

Sorry for the long post and/or rambling.

[otto]

Hello all,

@wattsup

my theory is to build first and then, when I SEE, I can have a theory!!!

If I would jump out with my newest theory the people wouldnt understand it, there would be a lot of bla, bla as always and I dont need it! A theory is OK but FACTS are much better.


@All

just an idea:

how about winding the controls in CW and CCW, maybe with different coil LENGHTS??

As said, just an idea


Lets dicuss if this is and good or bad idea.

Otto