Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

Started by RobotHead, May 19, 2008, 11:55:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Moab

Hi, IST & Gk, its been a while.

your right Gk. nothing wrong with trying..

sparks

     @Moab

         People start talking about magnetic vortexes and I go nuts.  What do people think a magnetic vortex looks like.  We  got two of them going at the north and south pole already feeding a plasma ring current in the middle of the rock already.
We don't need anymore cause SM couldn't keep track of a couple of video tapes.
     IMAGINE A BIG MAGNETIC SNOWBALL ROLLING AROUND THE EARTH GETTING BIGGER AND BIGGER
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

bolt

nothing wrong with trying it but the idea of sine is to use rotoverter setup to generate 3 phase automatically from 1 phase in perfect resonance.  Square waves waste power the leading edge forces against the caps charging requiring excess current and generates infinite harmonics.  You can turn square to sine but then requires perfect matching RC which requires adjusting every time you change the frequncy. Also squares increase the bandwidth by spluttering over the bands. Imagine making a MW AM transmitter of square waves it could have sidebands out of 500khz +/-.

So it can be done with pulses but only if you know the very final frequncy of operation then you can filter it all back to sine waves after otherwise makes tuning impossible as you never know if you are hitting a fundy or a harmonic. This is why SM said "pure frequency".  Remember the ultimate solution is extreme low power precursor oscillators which if locked steady will produce a narrow band high Q circuit with no wasted power into sidebands. When you have this you have a clean magnetic ball. Actually in reality its Dipole LOBES not a ball. If you aim to make a clean RF amp then i dont think you will be far wrong. Try to observe any sweet spots and relationship between coil size, collector coil C values and control gate frequency because whatever you do has to be replicated for the other side of the dipole.

For a quick fix you can bias your fets to class B with split R's or even drive it direct of a signal generator. If you tune it dead right it should run very very low power. So start with low frequncy first like 10 Hz need to see the compass is rotating smoothly

OOHHHH A final thought a STRF (straight tuned radio frequency) receiver is a low power transmitter:)  AND visa versa this means by transmitting a signal we are actually magnetically locked to the remote transmitter source at low frequencies therefore you can stick a crystal diode in a run through your scope and speakers- you maybe able to actually HEAR the earths magnetic waves. LOL Hey that would be cool you can listen to the earths power source.

Grumpy

still got that video of fireballs on the bench?

--------------------------------------------------------------

I have two brothers and I asked one why he would not divulge his work and he replied:

"They can either figure it out or stay behind."

Maybe he is right.  Maybe not.  So, I asked the other one and he replied:

"Screw them.  I don't have time help those that won't help themselves."

I think they are much wiser than I am.  Maybe this is why they have success with advanced technology.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Bolt:

SM stated that he did not know how it worked.  SM stated that he was not positive that the devices tapped the Earth's magnetic field.

Whoever took possession of the technology after SM would probably developed it further.  This being said, I am sure that there are perhaps half a dozen people that know how the device really works and can apply engineering principles to it's design.  I would also venture a guess that more than one of these persons has heard of our efforts to build an energy conversion device.  Perhaps one or more of these individuals is in our presence now.

Then there is the claim that the US Navy has had a similar device since the 1950's - this from a very good source.  I do not doubt this at all.

All this is fine and dandy but the real question is are you getting anywhere with your approach?  If not, I suggest you switch to impulses since there are individuals with success with this approach, even if they will not come forward.   Both of my brothers use impulses, but what do they know?


It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

BEP

@bolt,

Since SM didn't mention what field (as I recall) what makes you think he was talking about a magnetic field?

I dropped attempts at rotating a mag field a long time ago because there is no way to do it (around the N/S axis).

Constant references to rotating a mag field .... well.... I just blow them off anymore. Switching poles in a rotary fashion IS banging the coils.

Now build three electric fields that combine three vectors 90 out from each other and you have something, interesting at least and almost no power required.
Not that I'm pro or con on the wave shape but a good way to create a clean sine is to combine the correct frequencies of short pulses.

BEP