Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

[sparks]

     
       I think that beyond the realitivistic forms of emwave resonant reflections there have to be larger ones.  Like the earth.   It demonstrates 1/2 spin in the plasmosphere.  It has dipole moments.  Satellites that can only stay in specific orbitals depending on their kinetic energy to gravity ratio.  So that makes us Earth particles.  So if we go out in a spaceship and listen to the Earth what song does it sing?  This should give us the frequency of the wave expansion and contraction of the standing wavefield called Earth.  Then we stretch out a guitar string and let her resonate.

[bolt]

Notice how when you go to 3 phase just how effective it becomes.

Alternator circulation (internal in ABC phases): W = (I1+I2+13)/3 x (V1+V2+V3)/3 x 1.732  * Q

so take just this part on its own in 3 dimensions  3 x 1.732  * Q compared to a single dimension of 1 x 1.618*Q as in Bedini or Newman. 

Single stage COP gains between 0.3 and 3 so its enough to charge a battery if its VERY well made but cant cover mechanical loses to loop the damn thing.  Most of the losses go on homemade crappy build quality poor coils and bearings.

BUT buy a factory ready motor off the shelf made properly.

An RV setup is 3 phase so for 100 watts input they can realize (I1+I2+13)/3 x (V1+V2+V3)/3 x 1.732  * Q = often 1000 VAR and most of this is extractable and loopable.  REAL measured COP is often +5


TPU could well be 3 x 1.732  * Q where Q has been quenched effective 100,000+.   VAR on large TPU 2KW+  oscillator input 10 milliwatts COP > +1000   There is no need to loop the TPU the gains are already massive and runs with gain.

[innovation_station]

here is the modded ver of this pattend

http://0049606.netsolhost.com/projects/U.S.%20Patent%20No.%200462418.pdf

here is an original un modded copy...

http://www.rastko.org.yu/cms/files/books/46c5badf76cd6.pdf

look at "C"  hummm study it ....  this is a seperation point where the device splits in 2....




this then becomes G LOL     PLUG N PLAY     with many many ......

enjoy

ist

yes i will still do the pic...  so you can see ....   simply blow both up to 400 % and have a look at C  i figured this out over 1 year ago.....

[wattsup]

@bolt

About the utilities not wanting free energy, that is in my view the farthest from the truth. The oil guys maybe but we still need their plastic and polymers and other derivatives, but the grid guys, they will welcome this with open arms since you have to realize that not everyone will have such a device in their dwelling. I am saying dwelling because you have homes, but you also have all the cities, apartments and the like that will likely never have an OU need, simply because being on the grid makes so much more sense. So the home owner, farmers and others use these new OU devices and leave alot more grid electricity available for the cities. The utilities save this energy and also do nto need to expand their productions. Here in Quebec, I hope it will be the first nation to accept OU since our electric grid is owned by the people. (I always refer to Quebec as my nation.)

Let me tell you that we have to work smart towards OU and not be so afraid and paranoid. Open source is the way to not be afraid. 

Regarding the laws of conversion, how can you make such a law if you don't really know what the main ingredient is - electricity and you have neglected to take the ether into account?

@otto

I still want to believe that every coil has its way. Maybe with your air core, it should not be driven the same way as with your solid core.

What if (geez always that infernal "what if") the FTPU is simply a transmitter/receiver.

Then there is two possibilities.

1) Center toroid transmits, outer ring receives, or,
2) Outer ring transmits, center toroid receives.

If both are driven by the same frequency, don't they have to latch as feedback being so close. Would the toroid bucking coil ohms have to be the same as the outer ring coil ohms.

So you start with a 6v battery, transmit, whatever you catch with the receiver, you add it to the 6 volts to increase the transmission power, that the receiver then receives more to add to the 6 volts and increase again the transmission, and so on, running with gain. Does that make any sense. But that's a side issue.

Back to the two possibilities above.

One may work better with an iron core and the other with an air core.
I would guess that #1 is best with air core (using a resonance LC circuit) and #2 is best with iron core (but not totally sure of #2).
I really don't know enough about transmitters/receivers and antenna action so I leave it there.

But here is another TPU driving method or angle........

As you know, @armagdn01 has shown that you can light a bulb that is in series to an LC circuit and then when in resonance, the bulb turns off. So if you had a pulsing that is always in resonance to the LC, and if you could cut the pulsing, let's say in a 1 second frame, resonance 1/4 sec., then off 1/4 second so you get 2 resonances per second (this should evidently be faster), then you are actually getting two pulses per second on the bulb, or, two pulses on a coil instead of the bulb. The good thing about this is there is no switching directly on the coil but it is done via the switching capability of the LC when it goes in and out of resonance. This means the pulsing medium will last longer. I have noticed that with DC pulsing, you will hit the resonance point in many many points on the frequency scale and this must be due to the additive effects of the harmonics, whereas with AC sine waving, there is one specific point of resonance. If the TPU is at 6khz, this has to be DC pulsing since I have never seen any resonance of sinewave below the 100khz. We are all thinking about an LC in resonance cannot do work, but the LC going in and out of resonance is work is used as a switching medium. Hmmmm.

[ramset]

ist your one cool guy
@Watssup you are a definately an inspiration
   Chet