Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


The Key To Perpetual Mechanical Motion

Started by 0ne, May 29, 2008, 07:48:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

SINEWAVE

utilitarian, from reading your post i can deduce that you are incorrect...and have only experimented with '1' gate and used the wrong material.

1.properly utilized a downard introduction of gravity does not have to be implemented, for linear horizontal movement that is.
2.the moving object will exceed the tip of the v...it will not simpy stop at the tip.
3.it is not necessary to use a v shape topology.
4.the more narrow the corridor the faster the acceleration...but also the stronger the sticky point is.

almost all your statements contradict my actual findings.

broli, im not into giving my ideas up to people who dont take the initiative to discover on their own....but i would gladly share information once i see evidence that they have taken the initiative to actually try.

anyone who has the materials in hand can accomplish this.
--------------------------------------------------

one,:

1.mass can be variable

2.angles do not have to be pinpoint accurate

3.length of magnetic gap does not have to be perfect, it only assist in force...there are 2 magnetic gaps BTW (4 if you take into consideration each polarity)

4.creation of electricity may develop eddy currents, upon attempts of storage...i havent tried to store anything yet..but i visualize using inductance to overcome resistance...and not collecting the energy from the field generating the eddy currents...collect it at a different point...

Sudonym

The V in general is not necessarily the correct shape in and of itself, figure out how the fibanocci sequence and Phi are used to create the V shape you see in a tornado, or water going down the drain, and then recreate this movement.

utilitarian

Quote from: SINEWAVE on May 29, 2008, 10:50:17 PM
1.properly utilized a downard introduction of gravity does not have to be implemented, for linear horizontal movement that is.
2.the moving object will exceed the tip of the v...it will not simpy stop at the tip.
3.it is not necessary to use a v shape topology.
4.the more narrow the corridor the faster the acceleration...but also the stronger the sticky point is.


broli, im not into giving my ideas up to people who dont take the initiative to discover on their own....but i would gladly share information once i see evidence that they have taken the initiative to actually try.

Save us the smugness, ok?  We do not need your charity.  You can keep your wealth of experimental knowledge to yourself.

The only thing you said that I find true is that yes, the moving object can exceed the tip of the V, but it gets pulled back immediately.  It is not possible to propel the object to the next V gate.

The more narrow the corridor the faster the accelration?  Not what I have noticed, and how does that even make sense logically?  If the legs of the V are long and almost parallel, that means that the next point up the line is only a little bit stronger, magnetically, than where the object already is, so acceleration is slower.

resonanceman

Quote from: utilitarian on June 01, 2008, 11:39:42 AM
Save us the smugness, ok?  We do not need your charity.  You can keep your wealth of experimental knowledge to yourself.

The only thing you said that I find true is that yes, the moving object can exceed the tip of the V, but it gets pulled back immediately.  It is not possible to propel the object to the next V gate.


Utilitarian

Save us the smugness?       Who  do you think you are speaking for ?

As far  as   it not being able to   propel  the object to the next gate   look at the   V circle in  reply 6    I count  3 gates.

Or this  one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41_fkVfFNI&feature=related

It   travels  smoothly through 3 gates then stops  because there are no magnets installed  in the holes of the  4th gate





Do you have any other  disinformation or bad attitudes to share with us ?


gary






utilitarian

Quote from: resonanceman on June 01, 2008, 02:10:52 PM
Utilitarian

Save us the smugness?       Who  do you think you are speaking for ?

As far  as   it not being able to   propel  the object to the next gate   look at the   V circle in  reply 6    I count  3 gates.

Or this  one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41_fkVfFNI&feature=related

It   travels  smoothly through 3 gates then stops  because there are no magnets installed  in the holes of the  4th gate


Not sure what is going on there, but like I said before, if the Vs are arranged in order of increasing strength, then yes, you can escape a weaker V in favor of a stronger one.  The fact that the author of the video did not show a circle of Vs speaks volumes.  This concept cannot work.