Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Noob experiment

Started by xddorox, June 18, 2008, 05:55:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sprocket

Quote from: xddorox on June 18, 2008, 08:09:27 PM
I plug it on the 12V system of the scooter. I haven't measured production, but the jar contains 300ml of distilled water with about a teaspoon of baking soda. Like I said, the results are very early ones.

So you're powering it from the moped's own battery, and it's ordinary electrolysis (no pulsing circuitry) - correct?

Just trying to get an idea as to what amount of gas it takes to get a 50% improvement with an 50cc engine.

EDIT: - just saw your last post - so not a huge improvement afterall...

xddorox

That's right, no pulsing circuit. 104 is better than the original 83mpg(100mpg is what the manufacturer advertises, but after some math, they are way off as well.) and the unit was off a few times during that tank of gas. I have made some improvements and we'll see how good itis. However, engine smoothest and response improvements were well worth the trouble of making this.

Sprocket

Seeing as you're running things from a relatively small battery, pulsed electrolysis should produce better results.  I am going to build Lawton's circuit when I get the chance, even though I will be only driving a couple of SS spoons to begin with!  When I can source some SS tubing, I will build a proper unit.  Here is the Kelly pdf in case you have't got it:

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter10.pdf

Jokker

Buy the ticket !
Take the ride !

mscoffman

Quite frankly I'm not sure why all vehicles do not generally have this water-for-fuel type thing.
Except for having to add some additional water. Hydrogen apparently complements fuel combustion
very well. What you are doing is loading down the engine a little bit, for a great deal of improvement
in overall engine efficiency. You will not be able to run the engine entirely on self-generated HHO
(that I know of) but the kinds of efficiency increases you are seeing do not violate any scientific
laws either. Especially operating with vacuum above the liquid, that helps. When you put on a
bubbler you might want to consider a way to have the vacuum bypass the bubbler with a fiberglass
filter or something. Water vapor alone probably provides some benefit in the exhaust cycle as well.
Good work.

S:MarkSCoffman