URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[gotoluc]

Hi my friends,

I have already tested  something else.
Perhaps many of you, already know that (I don't know), but in any case, i will tell it to you.

I use the always same type of spark (it is NGK 7811 BP6ES) and i will tell you this as an information.
So , Instead of (to make the experiment) the 100W /220V bulb (resistor) , i used a ballast (which we use for neon lamps, type TRL for L65/58 230V , 50Hz, and  22  Ohm resistance) and it worked with C1=1uF just good (I was not to much satisfied)

Then I tried to connect the 100W /220V bulb with the ballast (as a queue, the one after the other) and it did not work (absolutely nothing).
After this i put again the bulb and i made the test again by using now a C1 = 8uF capacitor and it work very good.
I tried it also with a C1=16uF capacitor and it worked much better. (but when i spraied water on it, water made a small explosion and then stopped, i don't know why , perhaps the amount of the water was to much , i really  don't know).

(I have to say, that unfortunatelly I have not a capacity meter, to measure the "real", exact capacity of the capacitors. So, when I tell you a capacity, I mean only the number of the capacity it is written on the capacitor, just thinking that it is true).

Finally I changed the 100W/220V bulb with a 150W/220V bulb (with 33  Ohm resistance) and i used a C1= 1uF, and It worked.
I made the same with C1=9uF and it worked better.
I also made the same with C1=17uF and It worked  very very good.

So I made a small video with this last job.

On this small video you see the 150W/220V bulb (with 33  Ohm resistance) working with a C1=17uF.
So please , allow me show you the following...

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPxSYJyS3DU

Thank you very, very much again,
your friend
Damianos

I don't know... I like to learn...

Hi Damianos,

most excellent ... welcome to the plasma club

Great work

Luc

[gotoluc]

video corroborating pressure = intensified plasma

Hi all,

I have just posted a new little video corroborating what others have claimed. Mike posted a great video showing that increased pressure enhances the plasma spark.

I built the small fixture pictured below and ran the spark from the on board system running the plasma circuit on the Bug.

The Digital video doesn't do it justice but the contrast can easily be seen. Enjoy the video and I hope it answers some questions and erases doubts and conflicting opinions re: pressure and plasma ignition sparks.

The video is at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MP9CiEOEFY

Peace,

Greg

Excellent setup, test and video presentation Greg ... If you could get a hold of a vacuum pump it would be interesting to see what happens under vacuum

Just be careful, as I don't think it has been tested yet.

Thanks for sharing.

Luc

[gotoluc]

@everyone,

for those who are not following the topic at the Energetic Forum I am posting this information here for your information.

I was asking if a user knew about when we lean out fuel if the exhaust temperature increases.

Reply by User: Jetijs
That is how it is supposed to be and this is because if you have a rich mixture, there is more moisture (gasoline) in the mix thus it cools the cylinder. When you run leaner, there is more air and less moisture that could cool the engine. I can see this if I run my genset and monitor the temperatures. If I close the air intake of the carburetor a bit, more vacuum is created to suck more gasoline in the engine making the mixture richer. And the temperature goes down a bit. But on the other hand, every time I turn the vexus booster side ON, the engine exhaust temperature drops by about 10-15 degree Celsius.
Thanks,
Jetijs

Reply from me: gotoluc
Thanks Jetijs for your input to this question. I ask this because some months back at the Overunity water power topic there was an exchange about this. The posters were saying that rich gasoline mixture are used just to keep engine cylinders cool... this was the first time I heard about this. I know there are CRAZY things in this World but using gasoline to cool the cylinder ... so, use twice the fuel and create more than twice the pollution.

Please someone, tell me this is not true, we cannot be that stupid... and for close to 100 years we have let this happen and basically trashed our Environment

I would want my engine cylinder walls to heat to the highest temperature possible since immediately after the plasma spark event I would want an injector to mist water on the hot surfaces to get a flash steam explosion to kick that piston to free energy Kingdom... say, wouldn't that take care of the cooling needed also

Luc

Reply by Greg User: gmeast
Hi Luc,

Sad to say it's true. The perfect fuel-air mixture (stoichiometric ratio) is too hot for valves and valve seats, also it produces high concentrations of Oxides of Nitrogen so the mixture is rich to compensate. But now there are too many Hydrocarbons so you need a catalytic converter. It's a stupid, stupid circle. A 30 MPG car could actually be getting 45 - 50 MPG!

Yes! ... leanest mixture, plasma ignition, water injection, problems solved.

Peace,

Greg


Reply by User: Allcanadian

It is true, extra fuel was added to cool the cylinders then when emmission standards came along they invented the catalytic converter, but the converter would not run hot enough so they added even MORE extra fuel to cool the cylinders AND keep the catalytic converter hot. Our automotive engineers are a disgrace to the very profession they include themselves in and I have little use for their nonsense. On a brighter side we can undo their stupidity, twenty years ago I started experimenting with perfect combustion and detonation combustion. I developed a very simple circuit in which a thermocouple monitored the EGT(exhaust gas temperature) and this thermocouple signal was sent to the circuit to control a transistor which then controlled a small (variable speed) water injection pump---windshield washer pump. As the EGT rises more water mist is injected at the carb inlet this keeps the EGT at a constant temperature. Your engine is now a "Constant Temperature Engine" you can run the EGT at any temperature you want. In this case when your Air/Fuel ratio is leaned out the circuit automatically compensates to hold the EGT constant. If you run the EGT below 200 Deg it should be obvious that the glycol/water cooling system is no longer required.
Next, to set the air/fuel ratio I added another butterfly valve downstream of the carburator to admit fresh air into the intake manifold. This Extra air was mixed proportionally with fuel/air from the carburator to set the actual air/fuel ratio into the motor. The extra air butterfly valve was controlled through a non-linear linkage which connected to the carburator linkage, both intakes were connected to a common aircleaner filter. The non-linear linkage keeps the air/fuel ratio slightly lean at idle and progressively gets leaner as the throttle is opened, if you get way too lean the worst that can happen is you start losing power or the engine will misfire. I installed these systems on a VW and a 1974 Chev 1/2 ton with 350 engine,two barrel carb,turbo 350 transmission, I will not even mention the maximum miles per gallon I achieved because quite frankly you would not believe me.
This system works fine on older vehicles or small motors but as you can imagine it is very hard to install on newer vehicles because of the electronics.
One engine I found interesting in recent years was the "six stroke engine" which uses the same principals I have outlined but is much more complicated.
Regards
AC

[Damianos]

Hi Damianos,

most excellent ... welcome to the plasma club

Great work

Luc

Hi my friend gotoluc,

i feel you like a family.
Thank you again for your good words. I am always trying to do my best.
I am very happy and i am here with you.
Thank you again.

Your friend
Damianos


I don't know...  I like to learn...

[dreamyear]

Rare video of Daniel dingel year 1999

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=msFphgFzCyE&fmt=18