Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

Started by gotoluc, June 26, 2008, 06:01:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

happyvalley808

Greg,

Nice work !!.....How much of the mpg increase would you attribute to the water ?
Do you plan to do a test run with just plasma ignition to see how much mpg 's increase ?

Greg you are the man, ......ALL HAIL GREG !!!!!!.......

Thank you for sharing...

Regards ,

Jared

gotoluc

@Greg,

I was looking at your plug wear picture you just posted and noticed the J electrode looks like it is fatter then the new one ??? ... is this something that the camera shot is doing or is this real and the metal is transferring location?

Thanks

Luc

gmeast

Quote from: gotoluc on November 29, 2008, 05:11:31 PM
@Greg,

I was looking at your plug wear picture you just posted and noticed the J electrode looks like it is fatter then the new one ??? ... is this something that the camera shot is doing or is this real and the metal is transferring location?

Thanks

Luc

Hi Luc,

I see what you're talking about.  I'll yank that plug and look.  I wasn't using flash so it's not an artifact.  They are the same make. 

While I was writing this I picked up two that were on the desk ... one from the photo and a second one.  One has more of a yellow zinc finish than the other, the printing is different, there's a tiny, teenie, itsy bitsy stamping on one of the flats (differeing from the other).  These are definitely from different production runs, maybe even different manufacturers / vendors.  The 'j' hook is fatter than the one I used in the picture.

Well, there ya' go ... manufacturing tolerances.

Peace,

Greg

gmeast

Quote from: happyvalley808 on November 29, 2008, 05:10:23 PM
Greg,

Nice work !!.....How much of the mpg increase would you attribute to the water ?
Do you plan to do a test run with just plasma ignition to see how much mpg 's increase ?

Greg you are the man, ......ALL HAIL GREG !!!!!!.......

Thank you for sharing...

Regards ,

Jared

Hi Jared,

It would only be prudent to explore this from all angles.  I needed first to determine if further exploration was worth further time and expense.  Well I got my answer. 

When I worked in industry (gas turbine research, manufacturing technologies, etc.) there was a quote painted on the wall in the research lab.  It read:

"One test is worth a thousand expert opinions."

Well I got my test results and I think it's worth pursuing.

Answering a more specific question of yours about the the importance of the water: 

I think the steam  played a very important roll in increasing the thermal efficiency by lowering the overall combustion temperature, absorbing combustion energy and exchanging temperature for pressure with the steam.  But it does this without the regular 'stream penalty' because we are recouping waste heat to first change the water to steam thereby bypassing the heat of fusion penalty (a phase change penalty).  The steam now freely absorbs energy in the chamber, lowering the gas temperatures.  The expansion ratio has not changed because the compression ratio hasn't changed.  So we still expand the gas the same but instead of defining the thermal efficiency as temperature (t1 - t2) / t1, it is also correctly defined as  pressure (p1 - p2) / p1.  The engine is doing its thing at a lower temperature, thus rejecting LESS HEAT to cooling and related thermal losses.

This is what I think accounts for the increased fuel mileage ... increased thermal efficiency.

Thanks for asking.  Peace,

Greg

Damianos

Hi my friend Greg,

Thank you again for sharing your results of your tests with us.

Friend
Damianos