Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

Started by gotoluc, June 26, 2008, 06:01:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kevin Mc Carthy

I have built a medium voltage to high voltage circuit and would like some advise as to what direction to go. I use a fluorescent ballast 660 V output through a variable HV inductor to charge a cap 20 MF 660V through a SPDT switch (NC). Upon a low voltage pulse the SPDT switch discharges the CAP 660 V 20 MF to a step up automotive coil ( designed for 12v to 20,000V upon field collapse). The discharge of the TX goes through 2 spark plugs ( Bosh 4 prong ) opposed with a varing distance placed on a ceramic glazed plate. Next I used a 20,000 .0026 pF cap in series with 400ohm 40 watt resisters.

I get two different sparks when water has been sprayed, one type when the plugs are close together ( 1/2) inch apart which is a bright yellow red, pop and healthy plasma. The second is when the plugs are say 5 inches apart which is blue white, no burst hydroloysis, no loud pop. The latter plasma goes along the ceramic over the water molicules.

The former plasma is thick and a high density, yellow red and has a pop, lower voltage and higher amperage. The latter plasma has a much higher voltage ( funny but painful story), blue white, no noise, lower density filiment, thinner filiment.

Each discharge either type one or type two are 3.5 watts each. I believe voltage and amperage are very important to achieve burst hydroloysis. So there must be a maximum per wattage and an optimum per wattage.

What direction to go? Do I continue to find the optimum and maximum or do I do experiments to use the burst hydrolysis in another way?. I am going a different path then as a car sourch of energy and I would like any insight or suggestion, thank you.

djzissis

Quote from: gmeast on February 26, 2009, 06:52:02 PM
Hi Zis,

The transformer I'm using is rated for 24 VA, but that is for its normal use as a step down transformer but I use that anyway even for it turned around in our use here. 

Greg it's OK.!! a transformer can be used in both ways. Step up, or step down.... it's the same.!!


QuoteAs long as I can cool the 3055 transistors and the transformer I can draw continuous 36 Watts.  It is running at around 90 Hz. I am going to play around with different caps soon to see If I can optimize and find the best frequency for this transformer and load.

On the test bench I am consuming 60 Watts for 48 Watts output.  Not bad for such a simple circuit.  At rest the circuit draws 12 Watts

Although I don't have an oscilloscope or a frequency meter, to gauge output frequency, I metered the idle current.
With no load, not even the transformer on, I am having 160mA @ 11,5 V at input.
that means 1,84 watts on idle, without any transformer.

Very nice Greg..!! Excellent circuit.!! I thing the 3055 can handle more (115W)

QuoteOn your proto-board ... the double rows upper and lower are just isolated groups of 5 contacts, or are they 8 separate right-left busses, 2 lower right & left and 2 upper right & left?

On the board, it's the second you said.: The two raws are from right to left, isolated where the black line is.
This way we have, 8 raws from right to left. 2 upper left. 2 upper right. 2 lower left, and 2 lower right.

Thanks you very very much Greg.!! Very nice results.!!

Regards,
Zissis  ;D

demios

I was thinking something....is it possible to somehow use a simple circuit to increase the 12V going into the primary of the ignition coil to 16V? That way we'll achieve +33% power input to the primary of the (stock) ignition coil and +33% to the spark itself. This would be especially nice with one of those 60.000V racing coils. What do you guys think of this approach?

alpeko

Zdravo demios,

Nije problem pomocu bilo kog dc/dc convertera napraviti koliki hoces napon.Ali sta ce ti to.Za plazmu je dovoljan visoki napon samo da jonizuje gap i stvori provodni kanal.Sve ostalo radi niski napon a velike struje.Ako hocemo da napravimo kola na vodu,razmisljaj u tom smeru.


In english:

Not problem obtain higher dc voltage.With simple dc/dc converter this job is easy.For plasma efect on spark plug HV about 15 - 30 KV is enough for build ionised channel.Rest of job working LV but higher amperage.You must thinking in that way?

Best reg.to all.

Alpeko.

demios

Hvala Alpeko, sada mi je jasnije. Usput, da li cu brze napuniti kondenzator sa niskom voltazom i visokom amperazom ili obrnuto? Tj. kako cu brze da ga napunim?

Hvala na odgovoru!

Thank you for explanation Alpeko! It makes much more sense now. By the way, do I need higher current in order to fill-up the capacitor or higher voltage? Which way do I fill the cap faster?

Thank you for the answer!