Edward Leedskalnin

[th3jester]

I think I'll just let amigo relay my thoughts.

I do appreciate GK telling me those names, I have no problem with reading about what other people have done or accomplished and I know I will learn a few things from those people.

What I'm shooting for is a new idea, something that hasn't been beaten to the ground. I will do it and whatever I come up with I will post it and I will not fill it with half baked ideas or partial information.

@amigo

Tesla is the one person I have spent most of my research on. Anything and everything I can found about him I read over and over. I have several books concerning Tesla works.

[pauldude000]

@th3jester

Tesla patent #'s

381,970 -> Method of electrical distribution (look at a rotating sytem tpu... tesla style)

685,012 ->Means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations. (self amplifier for the effects of individual coils)

Get these and others at: http://www.keelynet.com/tesla/index.html

Personally, after what I have found, it is a direct modification of Tesla's work. (IE a ripoff of Tesla)

Paul Andrulis

[giantkiller]

I do not stand alone but on the shoulders of great men. I was taught and I listened. All else if folly.

Do not attempt any builds until you follow what those other men said and did. There is a bountiful mystery in there.

I did post 3,6,9 and what that means done by these other men. You're lucky in that these last posts are the most conciseful in one place. It would do you well to see the first 2 posts on 'Lords of the ring'. Notice the plural. It is a stun gun type transformer with out the spark gap. Do you want to spend time or gain time? I am not saying that is the final answer. But at least it gives ideas.

We have too many over educated people based upon changed content. Over and over again. Pitiful.
If any body cares or dares to dispute what they said then do it publically and you will meet a whole nother set of pitbulls just waiting to chew you up.

--giantkiller. He who runs blindly into a minefield will surely not exit the other side. I hate to see anybody burnout or burn up.

[baroutologos]

Due to my inability to spot any other relevant thread on Leedskalnin Perpetual Magnet Holder, i will post my thoughts here.

I have been experimenting with pulsed setups (toroids) and I-laminated cores, and despite my efforts, by pulsing and collecting the BEMF, my toroids can work efficiently at very low power levels being saturated easily in moderate power (despite some permeatability 1000 i think) and large size (80mm OD).

...

Recently my monitor's PSU went out and naturally i laid my hands on it. I had the curiosity how a light module can supply some 50w power, whereas a 50w transformer is quite bulky and heavy.

As you may know, PSU work by rectifying the 220VAC to dc, and pulsing an inductor up to 100 Khz and collecting the flyback in a second winding. of course a complex electronic circuit is required but thats the concept.

My question was, how the small inductor does not get saturated, even at high frequency. The tricks are 2. It is pulsed alternatively (middle tapped winding ala inverter mode) and the little inductor is GAPPED.
Why gaped?

i experiment with other matterials and cores quite larger and heavier that the small inductor. what i found out is that, when applying a pulse to a cored inductor, if the magnetic flux path is closed, it quickly falls in a "positive" feedback loop that leads to core saturate and inductance decline.

e.g. having a core with closed magnetic flux path, and having two similar windings of say 1 mH, to the one is applied a current (regulated) whereas the other is used for measurements. I have found that beyond a current o 50mA the seconds windings inductance declines fast.
If i reassemble the particular two-E core inductor with a gap and by having two 1mH windings again (some 5 times more wire though) i can go up to amps before i notice the serious inductance decline.
In other words as it is commonly known the gap prevents the cores from saturation, or to falling to this positive feedback saturation cycle to my view.

Regarding Perpetual magnet holder
...

As you know, very low magnetic remnascent materials as lamination cores does not show the effect of PMH Leedskalnin suggested.
On the contrary raw iron manifest that property.

My totally and instinctive view gained from some experimenting so far is that, raw iron has a low magnetic remnance. When coils energized in closed loop mode, it falls to the "positive magnetic feedback cycle" and upon coil pulsing cease, the remnant flux is enough to maintain this feedback which its up-to-speed. Upon introducing a gap or breaking the closed loop, this feedback ceases to exist and the remnant magnetism is very low to initiate on its own a new feedback circle again when the loop is re-closed.

Bottom line, my unscientific approach and understanding is that magnetic materials self-saturate (i got inspired also by the self saturated magnetic amplifier experiments - see my youtube vids) under proper conditions rather than to accept the explanations given by Leedskalnin. (e.g orbit of positive and negative magnetic charges etc)

[david lambright]

....i was using a small piece of calcite and what i feel now is similar to 2 opposing magnets...holding the calcite about 1/4" above the HDPE center...when i feel the push, i keep it in the same spot and the effect starts to grow, it pushes back harder....i cannot tell if it is being pushed or like Ed said about it being magnets that control muscle contraction...in any case it is a very strange sensation....the calcite splits light into 2 streams..Ed did say the streams had to be divided...and then run them against each other...that makes sense with what i have felt...with a convex mirror at the plane, i feel a pushing .but it is so small... just a part of this energy can be reflected...just as X and other waves penetrate materials, i believe this energy will do also..if the streams can be separated using calcite that would be interesting... to separate the N and S into streams, the PMH is used....gravity and levity are like a vortex to a point to vortex...temperature is the zero point ..the PMH is also at that point. ..lets say N = levity, S = gravity...L and G can only go one way so reversal of the polarity at the point and changing the dominant stream of magnetic current, with the PMH...is the how....when a PMH is energized ,an orbit starts...ring the bell a second time and dominance is reversed....if the dominant stream has been reversed properly, the PMH acts as the zero point ...now if the PMH is spun, the gravity does what it knows and goes to the plane but now its carrying the N ...and, levity at the pole and S...any pull of G + N results in a S + L push...these streams would prefer to travel in the metal....so put a S magnet at the plane, just like in the photo of Ed, and spin the device so gravity and the N at the plane...levity and S at the pole that can now be collected at the wire above the device, flowing upward [like heat convection] into the mass above...as the magnet and the rotor pull N and gravity, S and levity flow up the wire , from above the generator, to be used at the quarry..the S being attracted to the north, flows into the stone bringing L with it...i believe that weight, as we experience here on earth, is due to the gravity to levity ratio...this can be changed .every thing has a zero point...at the quarry, the wire that comes from the mass above the pole is copper...steel, i believe was used to cut the stone, but i think the wire was connected to the flat bar he used at the quarry...i also think that because the S attracts N. the flow of L+ S from the tool softened the stone making it easier to work?.......i am pretty sure that this is how it was done..... i have found that the PMH is multi functional and ...i want to prove that this, how Ed .built his castle....david