Magnetic OU principle, You should really take a look at this !

[Butch LaFonte]

I have verified the second principle of operation for the Perpendicular Magnetics Motor.
When the moving square elements are in contact or near contact (.003") with the upper bars, the repulsion between the moving elements is reduced to near zero and actually becomes an attraction force between the elements when the elements are in side to side contact. When the upper and lower bars are moved apart, the elements go into repulsion. Also, the upper and lower bars move apart with less work when the moving elements are together as compared to when they are repelled and separated as illustrated in our past video. This opens up the basic system for overunity design only limited by ones imagination. I will make a video later tonight when I have someone to help as it takes two to make the video.
See attached pictures. I can not express the importance of this technology.
Butch LaFonte
See video at > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAxbOQ3nM8w&feature=channel_page
.

[broli]

Butch I was already convinced a page ago but where does this put us now. The same problem always arises. There's always a lack of physically, verbal or financially help. I've seen and experienced this myself. It made me question the whole free energy community. Why are people trying to dig so far in history when overunity/free energy designs are right under their noses, all they have to do is contribute their share and it'll get done.

I will try to come up with a self sustaining design. BUT It should be made clear that there are two separate overunity cases you have shown so far. The free energy you get from individual washer repulsion. And the free energy you get from leaving the field when the washers are stuck together. I thought the latter was the stronger one and that's why the previous design I posted was based on that phenomenon. But I will try to come up with a simpler,better and maybe cheap to build solution.

[Butch LaFonte]

Butch I have a rotor design in mind that uses the balance experiment you did on youtube. Although it does not use the fanner repulsion but can be incorporated. But I just wanted to keep it as simple and effective as possible. Sure you can convince a lot of people that step by step there's a net energy gain, but everyone wants to see a self resetting runner in the end  .

The design I have is 3d in nature so I'm going to give sketchup a go and try to make a rendition of it.

Edit: Design is attached below. I have to admit that it has many unfinished parts as I got too lazy  . Even the spacing of the guiding hoops is not correct. But this is the main idea. First of all from that view it's supposed to rotate CW. Now as the spaced out washers come from below the magnet they get attracted by a big force as proven on your balance experiment. The distance between the hoops should remain constant until the moment the washers arrive at the middle of the magnet. At this point the distance between the hoops will start to shrink very rapidly thus bringing the washers together. But the magnet will still want to keep them in the field. But as you've experimentally proven the force is weaker than they were spaced out and thus the washers manage to escape. While coming back the hoop distance expands again and pulls them apart and the process restarts.

Broli,
The washers in this layout need to be recompressed against a repulsion force and the net energy gain will be zero or a negative.
The repulsion force between the washers needs to be eliminated during the recompression of the washers, but present during the expansion for the system to be overunity.
See my post dated today, 3-6-09
Regards,
Butch

[Butch LaFonte]

Butch I was already convinced a page ago but where does this put us now. The same problem always arises. There's always a lack of physically, verbal or financially help. I've seen and experienced this myself. It made me question the whole free energy community. Why are people trying to dig so far in history when overunity/free energy designs are right under their noses, all they have to do is contribute their share and it'll get done.

I will try to come up with a self sustaining design. BUT It should be made clear that there are two separate overunity cases you have shown so far. The free energy you get from individual washer repulsion. And the free energy you get from leaving the field when the washers are stuck together. I thought the latter was the stronger one and that's why the previous design I posted was based on that phenomenon. But I will try to come up with a simpler,better and maybe cheap to build solution.

Broli,
I don't know why more people don't build replications. I wonder if it has something to do with it not being their idea? Thank god for the people that do build though.
Also I believe many people are building in secret hoping to get a jump on the technology. Is this a great country or what?
Butch

[AhuraMazda]

Butch, Broli
I just uploaded a file that you may bothe find interesting.
In it I discovered you could use "closed coil of bare or insulated (copper) wire" instead of steel washers.
This gives you other possibilities to think about!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item249