Magnetic OU principle, You should really take a look at this !

[broli]

Koen1 if you have time to post such big post, that only people like you read anyway, which are filled with your godly knowledge you should better actually conduct some experiments. Your posts contain 0% food for the mind or something constructive unlike the people you're arguing with. I'm surprised wizkycho is even responding. You can think of me as you like after this post, but most people are here for one thing and that is free energy. And not the same old ego stroking from people like you that get a boner from "telling off" those dumb free energy believers. You are in the wrong community my friend.

[Koen1]

No, it seems you are in the wrong community.
Although your need for food for the mind does explain why you don't seem to use it much.
In this post of yours you do exactly what you want me not to do: you tell me off, you do not
add anything constructive, and you do not add any "food for thought" either.

Pot calling kettle black kinda thing again eh?

But besides that, you are not getting the point. I am not trying to put anyone off,
I am trying to get someone to explain clearly and in detail how they envision
a setup where the simple "fanning out" of washers can produce 50 times more energy
than the energy used to make the washers "fan out".

If you are so brilliant, my friend, then why don't you explain it to me?
Where is the energy gain, how do you get the magnets to seperate without them
needing energy input to counter their magnetic attraction, and if you do so by
moving a second set closer so that the flux remains at the same level, then how
do you get the washers to experience a flux decrease at the same time?

It is a remarkable feat to accuse someone who has been expressing his desire
to have this explained in detail which is definately a constructive intent,
of being inconstructive and argumentative, while doing exactly the same yourself.
Bravo.

If you prefer fellow forum visitors that collectively shout agreement and fanaticism,
perhaps you should go to your local church or mosk, instead of a dicussion forum
about energy physics?

[wizkycho]

Hi Koen1 !

If You just embrase the term Magnetic Transistor - Your post would be only two words and every one would know what are you talking about.

Term Magnetic Transistor - aside from very close principle of work (not medium) simmilarity to current transistor (small current at input controling large currents at output) - weak mag flux strenght controling much stronger magnetic flux, SEE the simmilarity...

Term Magnetic Transistor is good for our research and for free energy and OU developmnet in a way that many people knows how revolutionary discovery of transistor was indeed. Exact or even more attention deserves this well prooven method of controling strong mag flux with weaker magnetic flux at input - Magnetic Transistor is revolutionary in a way that is capable of using Infinite source of medium (for the first time in known history) and that source is within perm.magnet. Magnetic Transistor is revolutionary allso that If properly used
can lead to development of Energy Transistor --> make world peace very realistic possiblity --> deep space exploration --> colonization of planets with none life support atmosfere and soil --> etc. (all of it for the first time possible in known  human history)...

So carry with me Transistor Flag. Nobody heard of an electret (only few)

everything else you speak of is linguistic debate.

Wiz

[wizkycho]

And Koen1

You are Rude (COP 500) beyond comprehension - new term Overrudity and measuring unit is 1 Koen = 500 times of just beeing pissed.
agree ?

Anybody from goverments staff pays you to be so agitated - have any interest at all for beeing so agitated ?

Please show me the link of one of Your constructive posts.

If You can't --> don't quote me anymore.

And Koen Don't get Nude And Rude at a same time. You are not Iggy Pop

This is provoked mail cause You are beeeing so so Rude...

Wiz

[BEP]

@Gentlemen?
@Ladies?

Ideas are always of some value. Not always useable but there is value there.

For the magnetic transistor cult may I suggest reading up on mag-amps or magnetic amplifiers. Sorry, that idea is already taken and you probably have one in your home.

Electrets uncommon? Again, look around. I know I have two and maybe a third. They are in the form of a microphone from radioshack. An electret is the charge equivalent of a permanent magnet.

Flux capacitor? Boy that is a tough one! You can drain a capacitor to do work. Same for a magnet (as it looses magnetism) but it isn't doing the work it will only be part of the process.

I hope this thread leads to proving the last statement wrong.

I must think about the other concepts but my soup and crackers are currently in the way.


BTW: Mag-Amps were replaced by transistors. Mag-Amps(magnetic transistors) are still used today.

As far as magnetic diodes... @EMDevices found and posted detailed information on a bridge rectifier that was of the mag-amp variety. Yes magnetic diodes did and may still exist. I have no idea how good they were