Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Magnetic OU principle, You should really take a look at this !

Started by Butch, July 02, 2008, 01:01:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Butch LaFonte

Brian,
Our group animator Roger did it, I don't know what program he used, I will ask.
Butch

Butch LaFonte

Please see new thread under magnet motors on this list titled, Balanced Rings Rotary Magnet Motor
Thanks,
Butch LaFonte

Charlie_V

Hello, I realize this thread has been abandoned.  However I have some questions dealing with the original setup.

Does the original setup have the same reluctance with the washers closed verses when they are open?  This answer would save me a lot of time if anyone can answer that.  This was claimed to be the case in the beginning of the thread but I couldn't find where anyone verified this "fact". 

If you close the washers, does it take the same force to remove the magnet as when the washers are open - assuming you do not let the magnet touch the washers (in which case it should be harder to remove since the fanning washers will distribute the force over a larger area). 

Plain and simple question, does the first drawing in the beginning of this thread work the way it says it works?  If it does not, then why.  If it does then please someone must have verified this.  It will save me alot of time having to go back and retrace people's steps.

Thanks,
Charlie

Butch LaFonte

Quote from: Charlie_V on May 30, 2009, 12:13:12 AM
Hello, I realize this thread has been abandoned.  However I have some questions dealing with the original setup.

Does the original setup have the same reluctance with the washers closed verses when they are open?  This answer would save me a lot of time if anyone can answer that.  This was claimed to be the case in the beginning of the thread but I couldn't find where anyone verified this "fact". 

If you close the washers, does it take the same force to remove the magnet as when the washers are open - assuming you do not let the magnet touch the washers (in which case it should be harder to remove since the fanning washers will distribute the force over a larger area). 

Plain and simple question, does the first drawing in the beginning of this thread work the way it says it works?  If it does not, then why.  If it does then please someone must have verified this.  It will save me alot of time having to go back and retrace people's steps.

Thanks,
Charlie

See this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAxbOQ3nM8w&feature=channel_page
Hope this helps,
Butch

Charlie_V

So from the video, there is a great difference in reluctance from when the washers are closed verses when they are open.  The claim at the beginning of this thread is wrong and that moving the washers into the field when they are closed is much weaker from when they are allowed to open.