Infinity Coil

[AbbaRue]

To others building one of these for the core material take a magnet with you. 
The core material shouldn't stay magnetized after stroking it with the magnet in one direction.
Also was told on an electronics forum that when using multiple strands for the core,
each strand should be insulated to prevent excess eddy currents.
A thin layer of Lacquer should do the trick.
One can buy a roll of soft steel wire and cut stands from it to fill the core.

Of coarse the best core would be made from ferrite powder.
But that can get costly.

[z.monkey]

Howdy Y'all,

In my last post I said the device created a magnetic loop and not an electrical loop, this is incorrect the device is a magnetic loop and an electrical loop.  It was late after a long day of winding coils.

Drannom, yes the charge of energy is passed from coil to coil in one direction ad infinitum.  I'll look into the Central Sun information.

Abbarue, Yes the rods should be laminated for optimum magnetization.  Same holds true for modern AC transformers which have laminated sheets of iron.  The reason I chose the materials that I did was availability.  I wanted to build this core with the cheapest most commonly available materials to bring the cost down.  Making a custom core out of exotic materials would be very costly.  This coil weighs 17 pounds and has about $100 of low grade steel in it.  Instead of ferrite power build a slug with iron filing scraps from a machine shop.  This is a good way to turn those nasty engine blocks into free energy generators.

Loner, Thanks for the praise.  I too have tried winding heavy wire on soft cores, it doesn't work very well.  I call this a durable core, steel tubes.  Look at the history in the Hubbard Coil thread.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,5052.80/topicseen.html

On page three you will find that I was planning on building a EMD version and a Ring Oscillator version of the Hubbard Coil.  The EMD version is for EMDevices winding method which is like what you are talking about.  The secondary coil of each primary core drives the primary coil of the next primary core down the line, around the loop ad infinitum.  The Ring Oscillator version of the Hubbard Coil is what I have built first, the Infinity Coil.  Were going to test these side by side to see which one works better.  Theoretically, both coils support an inductive loop, one is directly coupled, the other transformer coupled.  My theory is the the device needs to be direct coupled because it is a current generator and needs a low impedance to achive high current flow.

I had an idea about the iron rods.  At tractor supply you can buy rolls of bailing wire, which is soft iron.  When it rusts it turns red, true iron.  Of course its in a roll, so you would have to cut it to pieces, and straighten each piece before using them in a solenoid.

Here it the latest picture.  I have the coil wired.  Now I need to provide some deck space to add the output terminal block and the control switches.  The battery is going to ride on the back tab of the mounting bracket for now.  I am going to connect the battery to the device using alligator clips so it can be easily disconnected during testing.

Blessed Be Brothers...

[wattsup]

@Z

Nice build indeed. Reminds me of the Cook Coil days. lol

So, how are your hands feeling after so many winds.

One thing though. Those washers under the bolt heads and nuts should be removed so there is  no chance for the magnetism to jump or spread from one of the eight coils to another of the eight coils. Seems like they are pretty close to each other, almost touching.

Questions:

1) What gives you the idea that the center coil is wound in the manner you have made it with two half primaries. Are you thinking that the outer coils will produce two half fields per 45 degree or is it just to have a center tap?

2) When you made the first outer coil, did you try energizing it to see the magnetic field effect with and without the center rod and measure anything on the secondary?

Good work.

[z.monkey]

Howdy Wattsup,

My hands are cool.  Back in the refrigerated air.  I am still working on the magnetodynamics.  I was hoping to avoid custom fabricated materials.

The center tap is potentially going to earth ground so we can have +/- voltages on the output coil.  This provides, well, uh, a ground, the general reference point for a connected equipment.  I think the device will operate OK when floating also.  This is in flux right now.  Still in design...

No didn't magnetize these cores, but there are plenty of others that I have.  I was going to post the specs for all the coils in DC resistance, inductance, gauge, and number of turns.  Also working on mechanical drawings...

Blessed Be Brothers...

[z.monkey]

Howdy Y'all,

After thinking about this for a couple of days I decided to change the schematic once again.  The idea is to get all the current and flux flowing in the same direction.  I was having some problems trying to initiate the primary coils so that all the coils were charged in the same polarity.  I looked at it by applying the charge at 90, 180, and 360 degrees, but in all of these cases there was current in the opposite direction in some of the coils.  This would tend to cancel out the current in some or all of the coils.  I looked at adding some steering diodes to force the current to go in the direction I wanted, but that is adding unnecessary components and overcomplicating things.  Then I came up with this...

Were going to apply the DC charge with a DPDT switch between two of the primary coils.  This way the charge is going into the coils in only one direction.  Then as we switch out the battery the two wires from the coils are shorted together completing the infinity circuit.  The kill switch is also in series with the charge switch so it also simplifies the wiring.

Blessed Be Brothers...