Selfrunning Waterpump-generator device runs 60 Watts lamp...

[JDHardy54]

Spinner and Omega_O,

I probably should have never brought up things I have done in the past.  It is true that I made a magnet wheel ten or twelve years ago.  Sorry you don't believe in me but I did it.  I have no reason to make up stories on this website.  Making the new video, I have truly been having problems and it takes time to solve problems when changes are made.  It seems like so many people doubt my credibility because things I do are hard to believe and are against convention beliefs.  But everything I say is the truth and I'm getting tired of having to give explanations to people on this website.  As I explained in earlier comments, there are a lot more people working on this than me.  I was warned not to go on this type of website because of skeptics and nonbelievers.  Most of the people pick on anything they can find.  I still would like to thank people for all the good comments but I'm really thinking of cancelling my membership on this website.  The machine will be getting documented as soon as possible.  Likewise, the new video will be out as soon as possible.  But I'm finished for now on this website.  I will not be back to reply on any comments until the documentation is complete and the video is finished.  Good luck all.

James

[Omega_0]

I probably should have never brought up things I have done in the past.  It is true that I made a magnet wheel ten or twelve years ago.  Sorry you don't believe in me but I did it. 

Ya, you should have kept quiet. Too late.
The obvious question to ask is, if you had an OU machine decades ago, what caused you to withhold it from everyone and build this water pump thing instead ?

A working magnet wheel is far superior than this water wheel. You could have changed the world and we would have worshiped you as GOD .... is that not enough for motivation ? LOL

Well like others you are running away with tail between your legs, when confronted with questions. This is enough to show what you are.
Ya, never ever come to this site, you should join a cult site, not a site where people can think and demand evidence.

Well, guys, the bottom line is, he will never deliver and he will keep it delaying until he has sufficient $$$ in his pocket, after that we will never see him.

[weri812]

OK GUYS

leave the man alone.  Give him time to get the work done.  When you work all week and the only time to work on the project is weekends  it takes time. So far James has done nothing wrong  just because he did not answer your questions  like you want  does not make him a fake.   BACK OFF  give the man some time.

GOD BLESS to all

wer

[fritz]

@spinner

Had some deep meditation about pelton turbines ;-))))

The ones I know are of the extreme heavy style with
huge mass huge inertia _AND_ they are almost directly
coupled to _heavy_ generators.
This is the reason why any oscillation of torque is
absolutely wasted energy. It sucks the power back
from the inertia of the system _wasted_.

What we have here is a super-lightweigth (compared to
the other elements, involved kinetic energy) wheel with
almost no inertia tribute to the system.
Because it is coupled with a belt to the generator - which
is capable of storing lots of inertia(the gen) - if I see the pretty long
acceleration phase - and the long rundown time.
The relatively elastic belt can store / release the input
energy in a way that the resulting efficiency is still high.

JD meant that the pulley drive is some feature which
had a high tribute to the performance of the system.
This is the reason why I still claim - that under this
circumstances - even such "infficient" "looking" stuff
can gain high efficiency. (as long as the involved components
match)

If you look at the internas of the pump  and notice the
almost _ instantly on_ behaviour (on the testrun) - as well
as the same on unplugging the pump (at the end of the video)
there is pretty no inertia with the pump.
The powerconsumption/efficiency of the pump depends on
the rpm/vs flow. This relation is negative as you see in the datasheet.
rpm constant, high flow, high load, rpm constant, low flow (height to lift),
low power consumption.

If the voltage of the generator would drop slightly, the rpms of the pump
would go down immediatly (no inertia) - the rpm/vs flow would change
in the direction of more efficiency, higher load (from pump view) and would
finally give more ouput. In this case the pump has some effect we would
call negative resistance in EE. BTW, more energy is sucked from the
generator witch is immediatly feed by the belt and the pulley with
some energy back.
In the video the speed locks quite stable for some time - but if the efficiency
is higher than you expect - this system can have a very long rundown
time.

rgds.

[weri812]

Hello Ffritz 

Your seeing in the right direction. The jerking of the  spoons add to the rotation with stored energy in the mowing water.
The sam applies to a steady pull on a  chain  runs for ever( till it breaks)    But if you  jerk the chain as it pulls  then it will  pull harder  but the energy that is  thansferd to the chain will cause the chain to break prematurly.
The Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator also used jerking  belts on his flywheels to help deliver the extria energy  needed for his system to work.

Ok group  open mind  think out side the box.