Linnard?s hydrogen on demand system without electricity !

[loosecannon]

good luck RR!

too bad about the glass, but i would never consider that a failure.

you learned exactly what you needed to learn to build one that wont have the same faults.

cant wait to see what you come up with next.
please post your ideas here so we can all feel helpful.LOL

again, good luck,
LC

[NssB]

Hi RR,

I've been following your experiments since day 1 and just wanted to let you know that, although your attempt may have failed this time, I have the ultimate confidence that you have what it takes to see this through. If I had half an ounce of your optimism, strength of character and downright persistence, I'd consider myself fortunate.

Q. Is it possible that you could have crafted, a molded 1 piece vessel? I imagine this would require some sort of flex property to allow for thermal contraction/expansion.....like Pyrex?

Just thoughts


NssB

[linnard]

Hi ResinRat,

There is no such thing as failure, everything is a learning experience. When you post these setbacks, you prevent someone else from making the same mistake.

Regeneration of the zinc as you are producing hydrogen, the switching needs to be every 3 min., that way you are always reacting the regenerated material. There is a solubility issue with the TC because of the cobalt. OK for the electrodes for producing hydrogen but no as good for the regeneration.

I have been working on my low voltage electrolysis system. It runs at less than one volt and 50 ma. I have filed three patents in the last 5 months. None of my patents have been issued .

I have been trying to get capital to bring this technology to the world but no luck as of yet.

I try not to give you any direction in your experiments, I want you to stay as you are, creative and a free thinker. Stay outside of the box as things are always as we were taught in collage.

God Bless

Linnard

[ResinRat2]

Linnard wrote:

There is no such thing as failure, everything is a learning experience. When you post these setbacks, you prevent someone else from making the same mistake.
Very true, and after a couple of decades of research experience I should always keep this in mind.  It was my feelings that were catching up with me. I felt a bit guilty hyping up the larger reactor because I was sure it would work out. I just had the impression that I unintentionally let everybody down. It would have been better if I had not played it up so much. I am trying to learn from MY mistakes too.

Regeneration of the zinc as you are producing hydrogen, the switching needs to be every 3 min., that way you are always reacting the regenerated material. OK, the timing was something I was going to be working out, and the short time interval makes sense. By switching so often only the topmost layer of the zinc is probably eaten away in the reaction, then regenerating quickly will help keep the zinc electrodes the same size. This sounds good and something I will use.

There is a solubility issue with the TC because of the cobalt. OK for the electrodes for producing hydrogen but no as good for the regeneration.
The electrodes I am using for regeneration are thoriated tungsten electrodes only 1/16" in diameter. Very small and there is no cobalt involved here. The ones I used in the small reactor showed no pitting and held up well over the 475 hours the reactor ran. I don't think I will have to worry about this then, but I will keep it in mind.


I have been working on my low voltage electrolysis system. It runs at less than one volt and 50 ma. I have filed three patents in the last 5 months. None of my patents have been issued .
I have been trying to get capital to bring this technology to the world but no luck as of yet.
I try not to give you any direction in your experiments, I want you to stay as you are, creative and a free thinker. Stay outside of the box as things are always as we were taught in collage.
The new system sounds great, it might help a good number of projects that are going on in this forum. Any information you are willing to share is greatly appreciated.

God Bless
Linnard

I pray God blesses your work and that it can help us all out soon. We need it badly now. Thanks again for your post, it's good to hear from you again.

[ResinRat2]

NssB wrote:

Hi RR,

I've been following your experiments since day 1 and just wanted to let you know that, although your attempt may have failed this time, I have the ultimate confidence that you have what it takes to see this through. If I had half an ounce of your optimism, strength of character and downright persistence, I'd consider myself fortunate.
Wow, please, I appreciate the encouragement NssB but I don't really deserve it. I just wish this thing would stop fighting me and give in already. LOL! My motivation is simply proving the true worth of this technology. If what I suspect about it is right then this is the answer to overunity. I am just trying to find the truth.

Q. Is it possible that you could have crafted, a molded 1 piece vessel? I imagine this would require some sort of flex property to allow for thermal contraction/expansion.....like Pyrex?
This is a great guess, and yes you are very close to correct. In fact, you will all probably laugh when you finally do see it. (if it works the way I think it will, that is).