Linnard?s hydrogen on demand system without electricity !

[leeroyjenkinsii]

Wow.  Dude.  Calm down.  I'm not HOUNDING you.  Jesus.  I believe you may be a little paranoid.  I have not personally insulted you or you work.  Quite the opposite.  I am just a fan of free/cheap energy but I think there needs to be a litmus test for ALL of these claims.  Most systems, even a couple of freakin' lemons in water can produce enough current to power a low amp motor or led.  There has to be reproducible tests or it's just pseudo-science.  These tests need to be something worthwhile and measurable not just low scale/difficult to measure models.  For instance, how can you really tell if your experiment is running colder.  Is it a 10 degree difference or is it a fraction of a degree?  A nearby lamp can cause that.

I am all for research and development but I really don't appreciate the personal attacks on my intelligence or the immediate attempt to influence the admin of this site.  Is this open development as everyone claims or is this just a club for people who only want to read their own thoughts.

One thing I did notice in Linnard's high producing system was a lot of condensation at the top.  Is this steam?

Can anyone tell me what experiment # in Linnard Griffin's patent is close to the high producing system on YouTube?  I'll try to duplicate it myself.

[Dingus Mungus]

Leeroy jenkins... How un-original for a WOW kid... So when do you plan on building a replication then? If you read from page one you'll know what tests we have done thus far, and how we did them. Feel free to either confirm or debunk our results, but I assure you I've personally seen this cell run for weeks WHILE SHORTED! Batteries don't usually last that long when shorted... I confirmed a minor temp difference on a test cell weeks ago. The thermometers were identical before the reaction, one placed in the solution and the other left in its vessel. I would recomend you try experiment #13 for yourself. Only then will you be able to fully believe what Resin has told you. I can understand being a skeptic, but you must do more than type to know for sure...

~Dingus Mungus

[ResinRat2]

Hi Chris,

Don't waste your time with this guy, all he has to do is read this thread from page one to here and he will see what we've done. I could tell him whats been done, but he won't believe me anyway.

OK Leeroy, quit wasting my time. YOU read from page one of this thread to here. AFTER you've done this reading THEN pick one of the experiments in the patent (which you've said you looked at but weren't convinced works) and perform the experiment for yourself. THEN let it run for a few weeks for yourself. Measure the temperature FOR YOURSELF. YOU! YOU DO IT! Do some work on your own and convince yourself! Then you'll know EXACTLY what the temperature differential is.

Read the patent from page one to the end also. LOOK at the equations and understand the chemistry. Maybe then you will understand what is going on and stop making foolish statements.

That is the only way someone like you is going to be convinced.

You wrote:
One thing I did notice in Linnard's high producing system was a lot of condensation at the top.  Is this steam?

Can anyone tell me what experiment # in Linnard Griffin's patent is close to the high producing system on YouTube?  I'll try to duplicate it myself.

My answer is: the condensation on the top is from the droplets accumulating on the reactor lid from the bubbling of the gas upward. IT IS NOT FROM STEAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (understand?) The reactor runs cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(understand?) I don't want to have to repeat this again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK??? GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Experiment? Try #22 of the patent. See if that one works for you. I believe it has the best output of all those listed.

Why am I upset? It's because you don't listen. So quit wasting my time. Do your own experiments. Read the patent and this thread. Then come back after all that and I will answer your questions. At least then I will be talking to someone who knows what he is talking about on this subject.

No one else has irritated me like you. Why is that?

I will repeat this for the last time. DO IT YOURSELF!!!!

[leeroyjenkinsii]

Thank you for responding Dingus.  I know you want to defend your friend and I in no way want to discourage his work.  I got interested in this experiment because of the results and the YouTube posts.  I am just your average guy...no experience in this field whatsoever...that thinks its cool. 

If you guys will look at a lot of the other overunity posts on YouTube, you'll realize that I've made lots of other positive comments.  If resinrat had left the comments open then I would have assuredly defended him against some of the complete a@#holes that post that would have called Linnard a complete scam artist right off the bat.  I am not doing that.  You have to realize YouTube is like the Wild West.  Don't take it so personally.  If you don't like any comments just ignore them.  If you think I am an idiot....fine....so be it.   Just ignore me.  Often when you argue with a fool, people can't tell the difference between the two.

In short, I'd like to apologize to ResinRat for any offense.  It would be nice if he'd reenable the comments on his videos and just let nature take it's course.  Don't even respond to anyone you think is just attempting to make you look bad.  If you think that's all I'm doing don't respond.  At least keep it in the open though.  Definitely don't waste valuable time feeling bad about it or trying to respond to silly challenges....there will be a ton of them if it gets popular.

However, in my case personally.  I am a Monday morning quarterback and you guys are the real deal.  But, being Mr. Joe Average that is excited over this can you please tell me what experiment is closest to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e85aPS6P72A

If you think there is one in Linnard's pdf then let me know which one could possibly, in capable hands (probably not mine), lead to similar results.  I wouldn't mind giving it a try.

[leeroyjenkinsii]

Resinrat....thanks for the info.  I'd appreciate you stop the personal attacks though.  I will try the experiment you suggested.

I'd like you to keep something in mind though.  You are not GOD.  Noone has to believe you when YOU say it runs cool.  I will try it for myself then I will know.  I just wanted to try one that would produce more current...that's all.

For a little perspective, do you know how many people claim overunity and are just scammers.  I personally have wasted at least 200 bucks from people on this very board claiming this.  I got interested in the TPU experiments and there were some adds for a guy on youtube ncbookz I believe it was and I wasted 50 bucks on that pdf he sold on ebay.

That is where I am coming from.  I'm certain there are 100s if not 1000s of other Monday morning quarterbacks here that may have done the same thing. 

Right now, I certainly do not feel even remotely welcome on this board.  I'm sure there are many others that won't join or ask questions now.  Do we have to be sycophants for you to treat us with even an ounce of dignity?  Will everyone that has reasonable doubt be treated so harshly?  I think you should examine your comments here and quit taking everything so personally.

Thanks at least for the experiment number.