Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rotary Pulse Transformer Question

Started by hunter, July 18, 2008, 04:05:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

hunter

July 18, 2008, 04:05:43 PM
Hello guys I have a question. I purchased a Pulse generator from Aquapulser.com (looks well build unit). So before I go farther what do you guys think, should I get a Rotary pulse Transformer like Meyer used and do pulse it with the PWM ( As I know the Lawton style PWM's are made to pulse the rotor.) or I just use it without the transformer.? I saw on youtube if I?m not mistaken some guys just use the PWM?s with no transformer involved. How much different it would it make if I use a rotary pulse transformer?  Also please correct me if I'm wrong in something.
Thanks

innovation_station

#1
July 18, 2008, 07:31:00 PM
i guess theres only 1 way to find out....

be carful!!!!

i recomend low amparage.....   :)  but agin it is how it is wired that matters....  to your results

ist
To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

HeairBear

#2
July 20, 2008, 08:42:19 PM
The alternator is the PWM and step-up transformer in one the way Stan did it. Dave Lawton's version is a bit of both the rotary pulse generator and the variable gap polarizer mixed together. Dave removed the alternator and found he got the same results without it. That to me says he's doing something wrong in the first place. His electric motor and alternator was only geared for a 1 to 1 ratio and Stan's is a 3 to 1 which is another clue to why he didn't see any change without it.
When I hear of Shoedinger's Cat, I reach for my gun. - Stephen Hawking
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions