Just for Greg

[PaulLowrance]

Here you go Greg.  I said that I don't like posting off topic in a thread.  I asked you to create another thread if you want to ask me questions.  Yet you reply once again in that thread that I am afraid to answer you, LOL.  Here you go pal.  I took the liberty of creating this thread for you.

You big error was to think you could insult me privately and then show another face on a public forum. I don't think you will try that again.

Are you serious Greg?  I had posted similar things on public forums prior to that!  I won't do that again, LOL?  I do it publicly all the time, which is speaking my mind about you.  The fact that you post peoples private messages adds to your lack of credibility.  The worst thing I said in that private message was that I think you have evil intentions.

The only error in the Excel spreadsheet is your too quick analysis. I note you have finally stopped talking about the ball having significant KE on exit. Just maybe you should have listened to those who have built and adjusted SMOT ramps before suggesting "off the planet theories" to try to explain away the losses.

Just more lies and warp reality by you.  I have not stopped talking about the KE.  Are you blind?  I have been posting at your forum everyday about KE.  This is just another one of your sick attempts to fool people.  You want people to think I stopped posting about you and the KE simple because I am not posting here.  What these people don't know is that I have been posting at your yahoo groups forum on your machine and KE several times every day.  They can go there and see for themselves.  Unless it is a news item or alert I don't like copying & pasting the same post at numerous places.

Anyway, when will you stop ducking and answer the simple input & output power question I put to you?

I clearly posted that if you want to ask me that question then do so in an appropriate thread.  Duck answers?  Who are you kidding?  I have asked you so many question that you have not answered.  In fact, I am in the process of asking you a question for the third time at your forum.  Still waiting for the answer.


To your questions ->

> Does your theory / simulations indicate a actual machine,
> based on your theory, will put out more real work / power
> than that which must be inputted into the coil to produce the output?

Yes.  I have told you countless times that I have used two examples.  First, the two long rod example, and then the latest example at my wiki project.  Have I designed the circuits to generate the input signals?  Have I built it?  I have stated many times, NO.  Again, the research is still in a simulation phase.  Again, I am in the process of writing the grand final software simulation version.  Again, it will probably take until next year to complete if I continue to spend 12 overs per day, 6 days per week on it.  I will probably take a break from it.  I have a lot of projects that I completely dropped for this free energy stuff.  They are not related to free energy.  I am flat broke and in debt yet I will NOT accept a dime because I will not give anyone false hopes.  If I am forced to take a break from FE and go back to making money to survive then I will, but I will be back.


> Or to look at it another way say we:
>
> 1) Put your machine in a box.
>
> 2) Feed power in & put a known load on the output.
>
> 3) Measure power in and power out.
>
> Can you please post a table of what those measurement will show?

Sure, when I build it Greg.  If you want simulation numbers then fine.  You will have to wait on that as I am in the process of making a major change to the software.

Since you want to open this topic up, then why don't you catch these people up to speed?  Tell them about your first attempt to find error in my research.  Tell them how your assumption was incorrect.  You tried to disprove my research by stating it requires the same amount of energy to magnetize a core to the same magnetic field strength if the effective permeability is higher.  You were admittedly wrong about that.

Listen, it is called research.  I am not claiming with any certainty that the theory is correct.  Time will tell.  I am not encouraging anyone to get involved in my research.  Sterling and others encouraged me to create a wiki project.  After enough requests I did so.  Later on someone asked me how they could get into such research.  So I added a web page on the wiki project that is filled with URL links to various science data where people can learn about detailed magnetic theory and experiments.  Sterling created a yahoo groups forum for me.  I never asked anyone to do that.  Still I have never once advertised that yahoo forum and I am curious how you found it.  Lastly, you will note from almost day one I have a statement at the top of every one of my wiki pages ->

+++++++
This project and research requires no funding or payments of any kind. No payment is requested nor has any ever been accepted for this project and research. This researcher has the necessary equipment and money to continue this project and research.
+++++++

Lets talk about Greg now.  It is well know and even admitted by you that you took money in advanced from numerous people for a SMOT.  Additionally people are quoting you saying that you had a machine / smot that looped.  So after 8 years Greg, you are still pushing this.  Look at your forum.  You are making a big deal out of this and still no proof after 8 years.  I would NEVER do that to people.

Paul

[DADINK]

speculation is not impressisive

[sypherios]

4realio!!