Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


New Newman Motor Replication

Started by Careica, July 22, 2008, 02:38:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

onlov

Maybe better way to get additional (back_emf) energy from coil and put it back to battery:

http://www.munkuvat.org/kuvat/108328.jpeg
http://www.aijaa.com/img/b/00380/2285504.gif

khabe

Wonder that Newman motors uses only half of possibilities - why half-bridge drive? Why only Push or Pull -  Why not Push and Pull ??? This is mystery for me - why geniuses do not use all what God is sotto voce telling. Of course, when read about he (JN) does not know much about back-iron - how he can know about using back and forth effect for rotary drive - because he uses only one-way ticket  ;) When full-bridge (H-bridge) drive then instead Push or Pull will come Push and Pull  forces -  twice more torque. And why these commutators ... why reed-switches? Why not hall sensors or opto-relays? Next step is to use Back EMF for timing - get sensorless drive ...
When outer side of (motor)windings coated with laminated back iron - then we?ll go more close to common motors. Huge number of different brands!
Instead of laminated back iron could be used rotating back iron - more less iron losses ...
like ThinCap motors, like Maxon coreless BLDC ... like Kontronik Tango (RC motor ;-)
When to use 3 similar motor windings - we?ll get common 3 phase slotless motor.
Look at Takao Shimitsu - normal guy from Japan - what he is doing -  http://www.cityfujisawa.ne.jp/~iijima-p/BRA2.htm
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=594518#post594518
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=53833
Regards,
khabe

onlov

khabe:
QuoteWhen full-bridge (H-bridge) drive then instead Push or Pull will come Push and Pull  forces -  twice more torque. And why these commutators ... why reed-switches? Why not hall sensors or opto-relays? Next step is to use Back EMF for timing - get sensorless drive ...

These schematics are maked for beginners (for Careica) who understand nothing about H-bridge and electronics! Of course, H-bridge, hall or opto sensors are much better and modern solution...

QuoteWhen outer side of (motor)windings coated with laminated back iron - then we?ll go more close to common motors. Huge number of different brands!
Instead of laminated back iron could be used rotating back iron - more less iron losses ...

Newman motor is really old and ineffective solution. With iron as you tell it will become much more better...


hartiberlin

Quote from: onlov on July 30, 2008, 01:43:52 AM
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2341.msg31244.html#msg31244
Back_emf pulse have wrong polarity to charge the battery. Plasma spark only spend electricity (voltage loss) and makes only heat. And burning the graphite (=carbon) makes only heat, not electricity. And "plasma battery cell" can have wrong polarity with battery (and with voltage loss of plasma spark) and decrease voltage...

Man who are studied at the technical university of Berlin, speak lot of nonsenses about the Newman machine and OU...   




Onlov,
the difference between me and you is, that you only rely on the theory you have learned,
but I did indeed test it with hardware.

Normally I would say you are right,
but the test with the hardware says the other way around.
The sparking gets additional energy into the circuit and recharges your batteries,
if you setup the sparking commutator right.

Have a look at these scope shots I got from my setup,
where you can see the huge negative current spikes, that recharge the batteries:
















All these negative spikes are real back current spikes
charging up the battery.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

onlov

Stefan, I have seen these pictures before that thread. But I will see your metering circuit.
You are telling, back current spikes disappears if your scope is grounded. It's very strange effect.